Telemedicine Strategy for Hospital Growth Post-COVID-19
This paper examines the growing role of telemedicine within the U.S. healthcare system, using AZ General Hospital as a focal case. It begins by situating telemedicine within the context of rising healthcare expenditures — which currently represent approximately 18% of U.S. GDP — and the disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The paper reviews demographic trends driving sustained demand for healthcare services, evaluates telemedicine's cost and service-quality advantages, and analyzes the competitive landscape including pure-play online providers. It concludes that a hybrid in-person and telemedicine model offers AZ General Hospital a distinct competitive advantage over digital-only competitors.
- The U.S. Healthcare Cost Crisis: Rising U.S. healthcare costs threaten economic sustainability
- Demographic Trends Driving Healthcare Demand: Aging baby boomers fuel long-term healthcare demand
- Telemedicine as a Cost-Effective Solution: Telemedicine lowers costs and improves access
- Impact of COVID-19 on Telemedicine Adoption: Pandemic accelerated telemedicine industry growth dramatically
- Telemedicine Implementation at AZ General Hospital: Hospital investment, margins, and rollout considerations
- Competitive Landscape and Strategic Advantage: Hybrid model beats pure-play digital competitors
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It grounds the argument in concrete economic data — GDP share, per capita costs, and projected 2028 figures — giving the strategic recommendation a quantitative foundation.
- It balances macro-level industry analysis with firm-level strategic planning, moving logically from national healthcare trends down to a specific hospital's competitive positioning.
- The competitive analysis identifies real-world rivals (Doctor on Demand, American Well) and articulates a clear differentiator: the hybrid in-person/online model that pure-play digital providers cannot replicate.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied strategic analysis by linking environmental forces (pandemic disruption, demographic shifts, cost inflation) to internal organizational decisions (infrastructure investment, service diversification, margin management). This mirrors a basic PESTLE-to-strategy logic and shows how external trends should inform specific operational and financial choices at the firm level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a macro framing of the U.S. healthcare cost problem, then narrows through demographic trends, telemedicine's general benefits, and COVID-19's catalytic effect on adoption. It pivots to firm-level analysis — costs and benefits of implementation at AZ General Hospital — before concluding with a competitive landscape review. This funnel structure (industry → market → firm) is a common and effective format for applied business papers.
The U.S. Healthcare Cost Crisis
COVID-19 has illustrated the critical infrastructure needs within the overall U.S. healthcare system. The ability to provide relevant healthcare services in an affordable and convenient manner is not only critical to individuals but also to the national security interests of the nation. Pandemics, although rare, can have a debilitating impact on society. As history has shown, pandemics can cripple operations, result in high levels of death, and shutter businesses. All of these consequences occurred during the COVID-19 pandemic, during which nearly 540,000 people died. In addition, millions of individuals lost their jobs, livelihoods, and income due to inadequate healthcare infrastructure.
Healthcare expenditure trends that were occurring prior to the pandemic show no signs of abating. Currently, healthcare expenditures account for roughly 18% of U.S. GDP, or approximately $3.6 trillion. On a per capita basis, these expenditures are the highest in the world at roughly $11,000 per person. By 2028, healthcare costs are expected to account for one out of every five dollars of GDP, or roughly $18,000 per person. The median household income is currently approximately $68,000, according to the Census Bureau. As such, healthcare costs account for roughly 16% of household income. This trajectory is simply unsustainable, particularly as overall healthcare trends show no sign of slowing.
Demographic Trends Driving Healthcare Demand
These healthcare trends do not appear to be abating, due primarily to the demographics prevailing in the market today. The overall population is becoming much older and living longer, and will therefore demand additional healthcare services over a longer duration. Baby boomers have been a critical element driving the profitability of the overall healthcare industry. They have large amounts of discretionary income, are living longer, and will therefore demand healthcare services well into the future. As they have fewer years ahead of them, they tend to be less price-sensitive and are willing to pay premium prices for healthcare services. These trends create significant tailwinds for the industry, which enjoys a large, wealthy, and captive audience.
Telemedicine as a Cost-Effective Solution
Telemedicine offers a solution to many of the trends described above. It helps provide a lower-cost alternative that can ultimately reduce the overall cost of healthcare treatment. Telemedicine can also be delivered during a pandemic, making it particularly useful during periods of massive social and economic disruption. Service quality is similar — if not better — for many routine checkups or procedures, thus saving time for all stakeholders involved. Finally, telemedicine helps reduce absenteeism due to cancellations, as individuals can access services from the comfort of their own homes (Alleman, 2002).
References
Abbass, A., Arthey, S., Elliott, J., Fedak, T., Nowoweiski, D., Markovski, J., & Nowoweiski, S. (2011). Web-conference supervision for advanced psychotherapy training: A practical guide. Psychotherapy, 48(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022427
Abney, P. C., & Maddux, C. D. (2004). Counseling and technology: Some thoughts about the controversy. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 22(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1300/J017v22n03_01
Alleman, J. R. (2002). Online counseling: The Internet and mental health treatment. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 39(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-3204.39.2.199
Aoki, N., Dunn, K., Johnson-Throop, K. A., & Turley, J. P. (2003). Outcomes and methods in telemedicine evaluation. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health, 9(4), 393–401. https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/abs/10.1089/153056203772744734
Atack, L., & Rankin, J. (2002). Nurses' experiences with web-based learning: Nurses face many challenges to maintain competency in a climate of constant change and dwindling resources. Online courses may be part of the solution. The Canadian Nurse, 98(7), 18–22.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.