History and Structure of the Turkish Legal System
This paper traces the development of the Turkish legal system from its origins in semi-autonomous tribal councils in the early 14th century through the dominance of Islamic sharia law in the 19th century, and into the sweeping secularizing reforms carried out by Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in the 1920s. It examines how Turkey adopted a modified version of the Swiss Civil Code and Code of Obligations in 1926, effectively stripping the legal system of religious references and aligning it with secular Western European models. The paper also outlines the current structure of Turkey's courts, including the Constitutional Court and Supreme Court of Appeals, and situates Turkey's legal modernization within its broader ambitions for full European Union membership.
- Introduction: Turkey's strategic position and legal history overview
- Tribal Councils and Early Legal Organization: 14th-century tribal justice and representative councils
- Islamic Sharia Law and the Kemalist Reforms: Sharia abolished; Swiss Civil Code adopted in 1926
- Political Upheaval and the Path to Modern Civil Law: Military coups, martial law, and democratic emergence
- Current Structure of the Turkish Legal System: Constitutional Court, Supreme Court, and lower courts
- Conclusion: Secularization, EU ambitions, and legal harmonization
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear chronological structure, guiding the reader logically from tribal councils through Islamic law and Kemalist reform to the modern court system.
- Direct quotations from scholarly sources (Fischer, Hanioglu, Basedow) are well integrated and used to support specific claims rather than substitute for analysis.
- The comparative legal point — that Turkey's adoption of a foreign civil code is not unique, with Japan, Russia, and China similarly borrowing from European models — adds analytical depth without overcomplicating the argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively uses source synthesis across legal history, political biography, and comparative law scholarship. Rather than treating each source in isolation, the writer connects them to build a cumulative argument about legal modernization as a deliberate political project, culminating in Turkey's alignment with European Union legal norms.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a geopolitical framing of Turkey's significance, then moves through four chronological phases: tribal law, Ottoman sharia, Atatürk's secular reforms, and the modern civil law framework. A brief "Review and Discussion" section handles all historical and analytical content before a focused conclusion that connects legal history to Turkey's current EU candidacy aspirations.
Introduction
Standing at the crossroads between Asia and Europe, Turkey is a strategically important member of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization as well as an associate member and candidate country for full European Union membership (Turkey government, 2016). With a history that dates to antiquity, Turkey has experienced numerous foreign invasions over the centuries, and these influences have had a measurable effect on the country's legal system. To determine this effect with some precision, this paper reviews the relevant literature to describe the history of the Turkish legal system and its current state. A summary of the research and important findings are provided in the conclusion.
Tribal Councils and Early Legal Organization
At the turn of the 14th century, Turkey was comprised of semi-autonomous hereditary patriarchal tribes, and legal decisions were the responsibility of tribal councils (Fischer, 1999). Although headed by titular tribal chiefs, these early Turks enjoyed a rough form of representative democracy. Fischer reports that "Supreme power rested with the assembly of the whole tribe but day-to-day justice was dispensed by a council of elders" (1999, p. 281). This system existed because the nascent national Turkish legal framework was inadequate for adjudicating matters in the far-flung regions of the country. As Fischer adds, "Since the inefficient Turkish legal system provided no protection of any sort, and since tribes had common land, pastures, forest, and water rights, these councils were responsible for administrating civil, criminal and family law and were required to impose both legal and moral sanctions" (1999, p. 281).
Islamic Sharia Law and the Kemalist Reforms
By the mid-19th century, the Turkish legal system was largely modeled on Islamic sharia law (Hanioglu, 2011). By the early 1920s, however, the country was consolidated under the leadership of Mustafa Kemal — who later took the name "Atatürk," meaning "Father of the Turks" — and he implemented sweeping reforms to modernize and secularize the country's legal, political, economic, and social systems (Turkey, 2016). Hanioglu (2011) reports that "In 1924, the Sharia Courts were abolished, and the legal [system] that had prevailed especially since 1864 came to an end" (p. 157).
In addition, Turkey adopted a modified version of the 1912 Swiss Civil Code and the 1881 Swiss Code of Obligations in 1926, which completed the secularization of the Turkish legal system (Hanioglu, 2011). As Hanioglu notes, "By 1930, the entire legal system had been stripped of any religious references and resembled that of secular Western European countries" (2011, p. 157).
Conclusion
With a history that dates to antiquity and a track record of foreign invasions and occupations, Turkey has always occupied a strategic geopolitical position that makes its legal system of special interest to modern observers. The research showed that over the past century, Turkey eliminated Islamic sharia law and implemented a civil law code modeled on the 1912 Swiss Civil Code and the 1881 Swiss Code of Obligations, adopted in 1926 under the progressive leadership of Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. The research also showed that the Turkish legal system borrowed what it deemed best from other European countries' legal systems to create a modern framework that provides its citizens and commercial enterprises with protections comparable to those enjoyed by European Union counterparts. This harmonization of legal systems is clearly in Turkey's best interests as it seeks to become a full-fledged member of the European Union and to reap the economic and political benefits that accrue to full membership in that organization.
References
Basedow, J. (2011, January 1). The Europeanisation of contract law and its significance for Asia. Asia Pacific Law Review, 19(1), 53–59.
Fischer, B. J. (1999, Fall). Albanian highland tribal society and family structure in the process of twentieth century transformation. East European Quarterly, 33(3), 281.
Hanioglu, M. S. (2011). Ataturk: An intellectual biography. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Turkey. (2016). CIA world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html
Turkey government. (2016). CIA world factbook. Retrieved from https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/tu.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.