This paper examines the United Nations' role—and ultimate failure—during the 1994 Rwandan genocide, in which an estimated 800,000 people, mostly Tutsi, were killed by Hutu forces. Beginning with the establishment of UNAMIR in 1993, the paper traces the sequence of decisions that undermined the UN mission: the withdrawal of troops following the deaths of Belgian soldiers, the delayed formation of UNAMIR II, and France's controversial humanitarian intervention. The paper also explores why the international community failed to act decisively, citing lack of political will, strategic indifference, and bureaucratic delay. It concludes by reflecting on the UN's own admission of failure and whether the lessons of Rwanda have truly been absorbed.
The Rwandan genocide took place during a civil war that nearly destroyed the poor African nation. The civil conflict was waged between two ethnic groups known as the Tutsi and the Hutu. An estimated 800,000 people were killed—mostly Tutsi—at the hands of ethnic Hutu forces (UN admits Rwanda genocide failure, 2000, BBC). The Rwandan genocide stands as one of the most devastating humanitarian catastrophes of the twentieth century, and it unfolded in a context where the international community had both the knowledge and, arguably, the means to intervene.
Initially, the UN assumed some responsibility for attempting to keep the peace during what was supposed to be a transition to a power-sharing government between the rival factions. The UN mission known as UNAMIR, "created in October 1993 to keep the peace and assist the governmental transition in Rwanda, sought to intervene between the killers and civilians. It also tried to mediate between the [pro-Tutsi] RPF [Rwandan Patriotic Front] and the [pro-Hutu] Rwandan army after the RPF struck from Rwanda to protect Tutsi and rescue their battalion encamped in Kigali as part of the Accord" (Ferroggiaro, 2001). However, after ten Belgian soldiers were killed, the United Nations Security Council voted to withdraw its 2,500 troops from UNAMIR (UN admits Rwanda genocide failure, 2000, BBC). "The Security Council took this vote and others concerning Rwanda even as the representative of the genocidal regime sat amongst them as a non-permanent member" (Ferroggiaro, 2001).
"UNAMIR II delays and France's controversial intervention"
"Security Council acknowledges lack of political will"
It is true that individual nations cannot intervene in every dispute or civil conflict around the world. However, through unity and consensus, the UN is supposed to provide some sense of moral compass to the world. In the case of Rwanda, despite the international vow of "never again" made after the Holocaust, genocide sadly happened again. Other than carefully worded, outraged press releases, nothing substantive was done by the UN or any of the major powers on the Security Council. The shameful moral failure of the UN has since been publicly acknowledged, but the question remains whether the UN will look away yet again when a similar civil conflict begins to brew in a remote region of the world.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.