University Graduation Project: NPV and IRR Feasibility Analysis
This paper presents a project management plan for a university's "Graduation Project," which aims to admit 800 new students and provide luncheon facilities. With an initial cash outlay of £58,000 and projected cash inflows over eight years, the paper applies Net Present Value (NPV) and Internal Rate of Return (IRR) analyses to assess project feasibility. The NPV yields a positive result of £24,250, and the IRR of 17% exceeds the assumed Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of 15%, both indicating the project is financially viable. The paper also addresses project planning, risk management, critical success factors, and communication and performance reporting strategies.
- Project Title, Description, and Scope: Introduces graduation project goals and university scope
- Project Objectives and Planning: Objectives, budget specs, and planning phases
- NPV Analysis and Milestone: Discounted cash flow table and positive NPV result
- IRR Analysis: IRR calculated at 17%, exceeding WACC of 15%
- Operating Strategy and Risk Management: Risk identification, diversification, and operational controls
- Critical Success Factors, Communication, and Performance Reporting: Success strategies, communication plan, and performance monitoring
- Conclusion: Summary of project evaluation and recommendations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Applies two complementary quantitative tools — NPV and IRR — to evaluate project feasibility, grounding the recommendation in financial evidence rather than assertion alone.
- Presents financial data clearly in tabular form, making the calculations easy to follow and verify.
- Connects financial findings to practical management decisions, including risk diversification, insurance, and capital raising through share issuance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates capital budgeting analysis by computing discounted cash flows over an eight-year horizon, deriving a positive NPV and comparing the IRR against the WACC decision rule. This shows the student understands not just the mechanics of each method but also how they function as complementary decision criteria — NPV measuring absolute value created, IRR providing a rate-based benchmark.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a logical project management sequence: it opens with scope and objectives, moves through planning phases (planning, organizing, controlling), presents the quantitative feasibility analysis (NPV then IRR), and closes with qualitative considerations — risk management, critical success factors, communication, and performance reporting. This structure mirrors a professional project proposal, progressing from problem definition to financial evaluation to operational strategy.
Project Title, Description, and Scope
When an organization is established, a number of associated elements ultimately become a regular part of its operations. Things are changing very rapidly in the current corporate world, which not only alters the entire environment of the organization but also shifts its customer base. Inevitably, organizations use different strategies to grow their bottom line and expand their customer base. Sometimes organizations face significant problems over the long run, but there are strategies that entities can adopt to address such challenges comprehensively.
To adapt to change, organizations must undertake projects that have a direct bearing on the company's overall financial position. The main focus of this paper is a graduation plan for a university accommodating 800 students, including a luncheon facility. Different project management tools — specifically NPV and IRR — have been used to assess the feasibility of the project. The project title is Graduation Project, and a planned approach has been adopted to present the work in a clear and understandable manner.
Broadly speaking, a project is an assignment or consignment upon which an organization's activities are based (Bossaerts & Degaard, 2006). Organizations analyze and undertake projects at regular intervals because doing so has a positive relationship with the company's bottom line (Bossaerts & Degaard, 2006). The scope of this project is quite broad from the university's standpoint, as it aims to admit 800 students and offer luncheon facilities — an added advantage over competitors.
Project Objectives and Planning
The project objectives are as follows:
• To gain 800 new graduation admissions.
• To achieve a competitive advantage through effective strategies.
Specifications: The budget for the project has been fixed at £58,000. Ninety-three staff members (administrative, accounts, and production) will be affected by this update.
Project planning is a broad term that encompasses planning, organizing, and controlling.
Planning: In order to attract a high number of admissions, the university must equip its computer lab and library professionally. The project manager must first calculate the approximate salvage value of existing assets — that is, how much the institution would recover if those assets were sold on the open market. In addition, the hiring of staff and managers requires significant upfront expenditure.
Organizing: Organizing is the most important element of project management. The project manager has decided to assign all departmental work — including hiring relevant staff and embedding upgraded software — to a designated assistant.
Controlling: Beyond increasing surplus, the organization also emphasizes cost control as a key operational priority.
NPV Analysis and Milestone
Net Present Value (NPV) analysis is widely regarded as one of the most sophisticated approaches to evaluating an investment (Erich & Helfert, 2001). Its main advantage is its use of the concept of the Time Value of Money (TVM) (Denzil & Anthony, 2009). TVM is a foundational principle in finance — the idea that money available today is worth more than the same amount in the future (Erich & Helfert, 2001). The computed NPV table for the project is presented below.
The project manager has allocated an initial cash outlay of £58,000. The projected cash inflows and their discounted values at a 10% discount rate are as follows:
Year 1: Undiscounted £2,000 → Discounted £1,818
Year 2: Undiscounted £5,000 → Discounted £4,132
Year 3: Undiscounted £8,000 → Discounted £6,011
Year 4: Undiscounted £16,000 → Discounted £10,928
Year 5: Undiscounted £25,000 → Discounted £15,523
Year 6: Undiscounted £27,000 → Discounted £15,241
Year 7: Undiscounted £28,000 → Discounted £14,368
Year 8: Undiscounted £30,500 → Discounted £14,228
Sum of Discounted Cash Flows: £82,250
Less: Initial Outlay: £58,000
Net Present Value: £24,250
From the table above, it is clear that undertaking the Graduation Project will generate economic benefits for the organization over the long run. The break-even point will be reached at approximately 6.44 years. Because the NPV is positive, the project manager is justified in recommending that this project be funded. The revenue figures increase strongly over the first five years but taper off slightly in Years 6, 7, and 8. A positive NPV is a clear indicator of the project's viability, and the institution should pursue it for long-term productivity. Management should also strive to accelerate earnings growth in the later years and aim to reduce the break-even period to approximately four years.
IRR Analysis
The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) is the discount rate at which the NPV of a project equals zero — in other words, the point at which total initial expenditure and cumulative revenue net out to zero (Erich & Helfert, 2001). The IRR computation for this project is as follows:
Year 0: –£60,000
Year 1: £2,000
Year 2: £5,000
Year 3: £8,000
Year 4: £16,000
Year 5: £25,000
Year 6: £27,000
Year 7: £28,000
Year 8: £30,500
IRR: 17%
The Weighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) of the university is 15%. Since the IRR of 17% exceeds the WACC, the decision rule indicates that the project should be accepted. On the basis of this analysis, the project manager is advised to proceed with financing the Graduation Project, as it will deliver beneficial results for the organization's long-term growth and efficiency.
Conclusion
Forming an organization is not a difficult task, but maintaining its position is genuinely challenging, and many fail to do so effectively. An organization is essentially a place where people of different mindsets and backgrounds work together to accomplish a specific goal.
Every employee and department strives to contribute positively to the long-term growth of the organization. Each year, organizations develop strategies and plans for their annual activities. This paper has presented a project plan for a new university initiative in which the institution seeks to invest earnings in a Graduation Project designed to attract 800 new students. Project evaluation tools — specifically NPV and IRR — have been applied to assess the feasibility of the project, and both analyses confirm that the project is financially viable and worth pursuing.
References
Bossaerts, P., & Degaard, B. A. (2006). Project Management and Decision Making (2nd ed.). World Scientific Publishing Company.
Dann, L. Y., & DeAngelo, H. (1988). Corporate financial policy and corporate control: A study of defensive adjustments in asset and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 87–128.
Denzil, W., & Anthony, H. (2009). Corporate Finance: Principles and Practice (5th ed.). Pearson Education Group.
Dennis, L. (2007). Project Management. Scientific Publishing Company.
Erich, A., & Helfert, E. A. (2001). Financial Analysis: Tools and Techniques — A Guide for Managers. McGraw-Hill Professional Publishers.
Jeurissen, R. (2007). Ethics and Business. Prentice Hall Publications.
Moody, M. (2008). Business Ethics: Case Studies and Selected Readings. McGraw-Hill Publications.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.