Untact Customer Service in the Digital Age: A Review
This paper examines Lee and Lee's (2020) peer-reviewed study on "untact" customer service — a model of no-contact, digitally mediated service interactions increasingly replacing face-to-face exchanges in retail and hospitality settings. The paper summarizes the study's key findings, including the condition that untact service is acceptable to customers only when the technology is sufficiently easy to use. It also evaluates the study's methodological limitations, including sample size, selection bias, and recall bias, and assesses how the authors addressed these concerns. The paper concludes with a brief personal reflection on the trade-offs between automated and human customer service.
- Introduction to Untact Customer Service: Defines untact and its digital-age origins
- Key Findings of Lee and Lee (2020): Technology ease determines customer acceptance of untact
- Evaluating Study Limitations and Bias: Assesses sample size, selection, and recall bias
- Pros and Cons of No-Contact Customer Service: Weighs efficiency gains against personal service preferences
- Conclusion: Customer needs determine untact service suitability
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly summarizes a peer-reviewed source and engages critically with its findings rather than simply restating them.
- The writer demonstrates methodological awareness by identifying and explaining specific types of research bias — sample size, selection bias, and recall bias — as evaluative tools.
- The personal reflection at the end is integrated naturally and supports rather than replaces the academic analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates source evaluation as a critical skill. Rather than treating the cited study as an unquestioned authority, the writer assesses its credibility by examining how openly the authors acknowledge limitations. This moves the writing beyond summary into genuine academic engagement with the source material.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the concept of "untact" service drawn from Lee and Lee (2020), then presents the study's core findings. The third section shifts to methodological critique, listing and defining key bias types before evaluating whether the source study avoids them. The final section balances the practical trade-offs of no-contact service and closes with a brief first-person reflection anchored to the reviewed study's conclusions.
Introduction to Untact Customer Service
In their peer-reviewed study, Lee and Lee (2020) show that "untact" — that is, online exchanges — as opposed to "contact" — face-to-face exchanges in a brick-and-mortar store — are increasingly part of the new normal of shopping and customer service. The authors show that even restaurants are resorting to untact customer service, providing customers with kiosks for ordering food instead of relying on waitstaff. The idea of "untact" comes from the concept of "no contact" described in a prior study by Kim et al. (2018). No-contact customer service is presented by Lee and Lee (2020) as the new mode of customer service for the foreseeable future, now that the digital age is firmly established.
Key Findings of Lee and Lee (2020)
The authors conclude, based on their assessment of the data obtained in their study, that so long as the technology is not too complicated to use, customers may go along with untact service. However, if the technology is too complicated to use, customers would prefer a more traditional face-to-face interaction for customer service (Lee & Lee, 2020). The authors also point out the limitations of their study, citing the lack of available literature on the subject and the absence of a developed theoretical framework for understanding this new type of customer service.
Evaluating Study Limitations and Bias
Because the authors identify and discuss the limitations of their own study, they appear well-positioned to address potential bias issues. Understanding limitations is a good way to determine whether errors in reasoning or issues with insufficient evidence have played a part in the authors' conclusions. When discussing research, it is important to consider limitations in order to establish credibility and reduce bias.
One common limitation is sample size, which can affect the validity of results. A small sample size may not be representative of the population as a whole, and results may not be generalizable. Another potential limitation is selection bias, which can occur when participants are not randomly selected from the population, leading to results that are inaccurate or unrepresentative. Finally, recall bias is a limitation that can occur when participants remember events differently than they actually happened, skewing results and leading to inaccurate conclusions. By considering these potential limitations, researchers can establish credibility and reduce bias in their work.
Conclusion
Ultimately, the pros and cons of no-contact customer service will vary depending on the needs of the individual customer. As digital transformation continues to reshape service industries, businesses will need to balance technological efficiency with the human connection that many customers still value.
References
Kim, R., Jeon, M., Lee, H., … & Kwon, J. (2018). Trend Korea 2018. Miraebook Publishing Co., Seoul.
Lee, S. M., & Lee, D. (2020). "Untact": A new customer service strategy in the digital age. Service Business, 14(1), 1–22.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.