This paper analyzes a range of U.S. macroeconomic indicators from June through November 2011, including unemployment, weekly jobless claims, GDP, consumer confidence, the Consumer Price Index (CPI), real earnings, durable goods orders, the Philadelphia Fed Outlook, and the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) interest rate stance. The paper evaluates what the data collectively signals about the direction of the U.S. economy, distinguishing between headline indicators that suggest gradual improvement and secondary indicators that present a more mixed picture. It also reflects on the relative importance and reliability of different data types when assessing overall economic conditions.
The following table presents a range of U.S. economic indicators from June through November 2011, including unemployment, weekly jobless claims, personal income, consumer confidence, GDP, durable goods orders, the Philadelphia Fed Outlook, the FOMC interest rate target, CPI, and real earnings.
What this data shows is that the economy was generally improving. The unemployment indicator shows a clear downward trend, with the unemployment rate falling steadily from 9.2% in June to 8.6% in November. While there is some fluctuation in most other indicators, this one has a solid trend line. Another indicator that shows a consistent pattern is the FOMC statement: the Federal Open Market Committee kept interest rates steady and low — at 0–0.25% — throughout the entire six-month period.
Consumer confidence is an interesting indicator, mainly because of the outlier recorded in October. While the level of confidence had generally not changed much across the period, something happened in October to drive confidence down dramatically — from 57.8 in September to just 40.9. It subsequently returned to its normal level of 56.0 in November. GDP was also growing, albeit slowly, rising from 15,012.8 in June to 15,180.9 in September.
The other indicators present a more mixed picture of the economy. Real earnings both increased and decreased over the period. The Consumer Price Index (CPI), a measure of inflation, wavered considerably over the six months. Inflation was relatively strong through the summer but fell back to deflationary levels by October. It should be noted that the CPI figure used here is the headline number, which includes food and gas prices. Gas prices rose during the summer and subsequently declined — this likely explains much of the observed change in CPI. Core CPI, which excludes food and energy, would probably be a more stable and informative measure.
Durable goods orders also varied considerably over the six-month period, alternating between gains and losses with very little discernible trend. This sends mixed signals about the state of manufacturing in the country.
"Philadelphia Outlook volatility and debt ceiling impact"
"Headline indicators improve despite secondary mixed signals"
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.