The U.S. Electoral College: How It Works and Why It Falls Short
This paper examines the United States Electoral College system, tracing its constitutional origins and explaining its mechanics — including the 538-elector framework and the 270-vote threshold required to win the presidency. It compares the Electoral College to proportional representation and mixed proportional representation systems used in many Western democracies, highlighting key structural differences. The paper then contrasts these systems, noting that the winner-take-all nature of the Electoral College can produce a president who lost the popular vote. The paper concludes with an argument that the Electoral College is fundamentally undemocratic because it renders millions of votes effectively meaningless, and calls for its replacement with a system that more accurately reflects the will of all American voters.
- Introduction: Overview of the paper's four objectives
- How the Electoral College Works: Constitutional origins and mechanics of the Electoral College
- Comparing Voting Systems Around the World: Proportional and mixed proportional systems as alternatives
- Contrasting the Electoral College with Alternative Systems: Winner-take-all versus proportional vote allocation
- Is the Electoral College Democratic?: Normative argument that the system suppresses voter voice
- Conclusion: Summary and call for electoral reform
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper maintains a clear four-part structure — description, comparison, contrast, and opinion — that gives readers a logical progression from factual background to evaluative argument.
- It grounds claims in authoritative sources, including the U.S. National Archives, Black's Law Dictionary, and peer-reviewed research, lending credibility to both the descriptive and argumentative sections.
- The opinion section is explicitly framed as such, distinguishing analysis from argument and demonstrating intellectual honesty about the paper's normative stance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of definition-based argumentation: by anchoring the concept of "democracy" in a formal legal definition, the author constructs a measurable standard against which the Electoral College can be evaluated. This moves the argument beyond opinion into a logically testable claim — that the Electoral College fails to meet democracy's own definitional criteria.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief introduction that maps its four objectives. Each subsequent section addresses one objective in turn: explaining the Electoral College, comparing it to global alternatives, contrasting structural differences, and rendering a normative judgment. The conclusion synthesizes these threads and ends with a policy recommendation, giving the paper a satisfying argumentative arc from description to prescription.
Introduction
This paper has four objectives: (1) to describe the voting system in the United States and explain how it works; (2) to compare the American electoral system with other types of voting systems; (3) to contrast the American electoral system with those other systems; and (4) to offer an opinion as to which type of electoral system is the most democratic. The paper concludes with a summary of significant findings concerning the voting system in the United States.
References
Black's Law Dictionary. (1999). St. Paul, MN: West Publishing Company.
Electoral College. (2023). U.S. National Archives. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college
Electoral College History. (2023). U.S. National Archives. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/history#whyec
George, J. (2019, May). Mixed member proportional system: An alternative electoral system to Indian democracy. Online International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, 9(2), 126–131.
Proportional representation voting systems. (2023). Fair Vote. Retrieved from https://fairvote.org/archives/proportional-representation-voting-systems/
Revesz, R. (2016, November 16). Five presidential nominees who won popular vote but lost the election. The Independent. Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/popular-vote-electoral-college-five-presidential-nominees-hillary-clinton-al-gore-a7420971.html
What is the Electoral College? (2023). U.S. National Archives. Retrieved from https://www.archives.gov/electoral-college/about
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.