U.S. Import Demand for Tea: Price, GDP, and Dollar Strength
This paper analyzes the demand for imported tea in the United States over the period 1961 to 2000, using a linear regression model with import volume as a function of real price, real GDP, and population. The study finds that contrary to standard economic expectations, neither rising GDP per capita nor price changes alone adequately explain fluctuations in tea import expenditures. Instead, the strength of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies emerges as a key driver of import patterns. The paper also reviews federal quality regulations governing tea imports, global production forecasts, and the potential role of health-benefit marketing campaigns in boosting future consumption.
- Introduction and Theoretical Framework: Economic determinants of U.S. tea import demand
- Federal Regulations and Global Production Trends: Tea quality laws and FAO global production forecasts
- Data and Methodology: Regression model variables and data sources
- Results and Observations: Dollar strength, price spikes, and import patterns
- Conclusions: Currency value as the primary import demand driver
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly states its theoretical framework upfront, identifying the key determinants of import demand before building its empirical model, which gives the analysis a logical foundation.
- It moves beyond expected results — when GDP and price fail to explain the data, the author investigates currency valuation as an alternative driver, demonstrating intellectual flexibility.
- The inclusion of regulatory context (Tea Importation Act, FDA standards) situates the economic analysis within a real policy environment, adding practical depth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of multiple regression combined with time-series observation to test economic hypotheses. Rather than simply reporting regression outputs, the author interprets unexpected findings — such as the non-proportional relationship between GDP growth and import expenditures — by turning to external variables like currency strength, showing how to reason beyond a model's initial results.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction laying out the economic theory of import demand and its application to tea. A second section covers regulatory and global production context. A methodology section defines the regression model and variables. The results section provides detailed observation of trends across several decades. The paper closes with a conclusions section connecting findings to policy implications and future demand projections.
Introduction and Theoretical Framework
According to basic economic theory, the level of demand for the import of any good for consumption is determined by the following factors, though their relative importance may vary from country to country: the real prices of the good; the real prices of its substitute or complementary good; real income; the size, composition, and growth rate of the population; price elasticity of demand; income elasticity of demand; cross elasticity of demand; shifts in consumer preferences or habits; the availability of foreign exchange; and changes in the trade policies of exporting and importing countries, along with other non-price factors. The complementary product for tea is coffee.
As far as tea is concerned, prices are largely determined by market forces, while the prices of its close substitute — coffee — along with real income, population, price elasticity, income elasticity, cross elasticity, and changes in consumer preferences all play a role in determining the level of import demand in any given country. Based on this proposition, the study builds appropriate import demand models for analyzing the pattern of tea imports for consumption in the United States. Because tea imports constitute an insignificant share of total U.S. imports, the variable "availability of foreign exchange" has been deliberately excluded from the model. The working hypothesis is that import expenditures would rise as GDP rose and prices fell.
An important reason for fluctuations in exports is reflected by changes in the value of the dollar relative to foreign currencies. The dollar lost value against foreign currencies during the 1970s, making U.S. agricultural products less expensive in importing countries and, predictably, sales increased. In the early 1980s the dollar gained strength, making U.S. exports more expensive to foreign buyers, and exports declined. The dollar then weakened again and exports recovered somewhat. These trends had the inverse effect on imports (U.S. Census Bureau, 2002).
Federal Regulations and Global Production Trends
There are federal laws that attempt to control the quality of imported tea. The U.S. Department of Agriculture is responsible for accepting or rejecting tea at customs. The Tea Importation Act contains provisions to destroy inferior products that arrive in the United States. Tea (Thea sinensis) is subject to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and the Tea Importation Act. Under the latter law, tea offered for entry must meet the standards of purity, quality, and fitness for consumption prescribed under 21 CFR 1220. Beverages brewed from the leaves of other plants may be labeled as "___ tea" as long as the blank is filled in with the name of a specific plant material. The name must clearly differentiate the product from traditional "tea" or "flavored tea" (e.g., "lemon tea" or "raspberry tea"), both of which contain Thea sinensis (FDA Blue Book). This research is limited to only those products containing 100% Thea sinensis. Because Thea sinensis (Camellia) cannot be grown in most areas of the United States, the U.S. imports 100% of its tea consumption (FATUS, 1996).
The UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) has stated that there is an increasing weight of scientific evidence that both black and green tea can be an important contributor to a healthy lifestyle. The FAO Tea Mark was designed for use in marketing and communication programs to promote the potential benefits of black tea. It was developed with financial assistance from the Common Fund for Commodities and the tea trade in major producing and consuming countries. FAO documents prepared for the Intergovernmental Group (IGG) on Tea reported that the agency "seeks to encourage the tea industry to adopt this new campaign because it has the potential to increase overall tea consumption for the benefit of both producer and consuming nations" (FAO, 1996).
FAO documents indicate that world tea production was projected to increase from the 1993–95 average of 1.97 million tonnes to 2.7 million tonnes in 2005, representing an average annual growth rate of 2.8%. Production in India was estimated at 1.02 million tonnes in 2005, also reflecting an average annual growth rate of 2.8% from the 1993–95 base.
Economic reforms and national plans to expand tea production in Sri Lanka were expected to boost output in that country to 285,000 tonnes, compared to 240,000 tonnes during 1993–95, an annual growth rate of 1.6%. Other major tea-producing countries, including China and Indonesia, were also expected to see significant production growth, while Bangladesh was forecast to grow more slowly. Increases in both yields and planted area were anticipated to support strong growth in African tea-producing countries, with Kenyan output projected to increase at an average annual rate of 2.8%. These expansions in global supply were expected to support increased tea consumption overall.
Data and Methodology
The present study is limited to the period 1961 to 2000 and is based on secondary data. The following functional relationship was identified for analyzing the pattern of tea consumption in the United States:
It = f (P, Y, PO)
Where: It = import volume of tea; P = real price of tea in U.S. dollars; Y = real Gross Domestic Product in U.S. dollars; PO = population.
Linear regression was used in combination with time-series analysis to track changes over time. Multiple R, R-Square, Adjusted R-Square, Standard Error, and qualitative observations were used to validate the sample data.
Works Cited
Firstgov. 2002. http://www.firstgov.gov. Accessed April 2002.
Food and Agricultural Organization. 13th Session of the Intergovernmental Group on Tea. 1999. Accessed April 2002.
Food and Drug Administration. Blue Book. Accessed April 2002.
Foreign Agricultural Trade of the United States (FATUS). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service, Apr/May/Jun 1996 issue.
U.S. Census Bureau. Statistical Abstract of the United States 2002. Accessed April 2002.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2002. http://www.usda.gov. Accessed April 2002.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.