Literature Review Undergraduate 680 words

Predicting Violence: Risk Factors and Individual Characteristics

~4 min read

Abstract

This paper reviews peer-reviewed literature on the characteristics and risk factors associated with violent behavior. The analysis identifies key predisposing factors including gender, personality traits, impulsivity, marital status, and environmental stressors. The paper distinguishes between reactive violence—emotion-based responses to direct threats that are typically isolated incidents—and instrumental violence, which is planned, manipulative, and associated with psychopathic traits. The review emphasizes that while men show higher rates of violent behavior than women, virtually anyone can become violent under certain circumstances. Additionally, personality disorders and aggression levels correlate with violent tendencies, and individuals predisposed to instrumental violence often show limited responsiveness to antipsychotic medications.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

▼

What makes this paper effective

Clear distinction between two types of violence (reactive and instrumental), providing a conceptual framework that organizes the discussion meaningfully
Grounding in peer-reviewed literature with appropriate citations, establishing credibility for claims about predisposing factors
Acknowledgment of the complexity of violence prediction—rejecting oversimplification while identifying legitimate risk correlates
Practical legal grounding through reference to Black's Law Dictionary, connecting theoretical discussion to real-world implications

Key academic technique demonstrated

This paper employs literature review synthesis to organize disparate research findings into a coherent framework. Rather than simply listing risk factors, the author uses the reactive/instrumental distinction as an organizing principle that allows comparison of different violent pathways and their prognoses. This demonstrates how strategic categorization can elevate a straightforward review into analytical work.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with a hook addressing public confusion about violence prediction, then narrows to its central question. The body is organized around two major sections: a general review of predisposing factors, then a deeper exploration of violence typology. This movement from broad to specific allows readers to understand the landscape before encountering the more nuanced distinction between violence types. The conclusion returns to the opening tension, demonstrating how the typology resolves it.

Introduction

The headlines today are filled with anecdotal accounts of people described as "the quiet type" who then commit seemingly inexplicable violent acts. Conversely, violent acts are sometimes committed by people presciently described as "a bomb waiting to explode." Furthermore, it is reasonable to suggest that virtually anyone can become violent under certain circumstances. To determine the facts, this paper reviews relevant peer-reviewed literature concerning the characteristics of individuals who may become violent and discusses how these characteristics contribute to increased violence in those who are mentally ill. A summary of the research and important findings concerning predispositions to violence are provided in the conclusion.

Risk Factors and Predispositions to Violence

A number of factors can contribute to a predisposition to violence, including gender, personality traits such as impulsive-aggressive behaviors, marital status, and various environmental stressors (Kumar & Rajmohan, 2013). Studies have shown that men are more likely to become violent than women, and anger and resentment are both positively correlated with violent tendencies (Kumar & Rajmohan, 2013). Additionally, mental illness has been repeatedly documented as a contributing factor to violent episodes (Kumar & Rajmohan, 2013). Likewise, general anger levels and personality disorders have been repeatedly shown to be prevalent among violent men (Holzworth & Saunders, 2009).

Reactive vs. Instrumental Violence

It is important to note that there are two fundamentally different types of violence: reactive violence and instrumental violence (Antonius & Sinclair, 2013). As the term implies, reactive violence is emotion-based and is usually a response to direct threats or provocations. This type of violent response may be justifiable and can even be legally protected. For instance, according to Black's Law Dictionary (1990), provocations such as "fighting words" can be legal cause for a violent response. Black's defines "fighting words" as "The First Amendment doctrine that certain utterances are not constitutionally protected as free speech if they are inherently likely to provoke a violent response" (1990, p. 627). Reactive violence is most likely an isolated incident that will not repeat unless comparable circumstances present themselves again in the future (Antonius & Sinclair, 2013).

By sharp contrast, instrumental violence is aggressive behavior that is "manipulative, callous, planned, and often motivated by goals" (Antonius & Sinclair, 2013, p. 588). This type of violence is characterized by core psychopathic characteristics, and these personality types are more likely to commit multiple acts of violence during their lifetimes (Antonius & Sinclair, 2013). More troubling still, personality types predisposed to violence are not typically responsive to antipsychotic medication regimens (Antonius & Sinclair, 2013).

1 Locked Section · 98 words remaining

Implications for Mental Illness and Treatment · 98 words

"Psychopathic traits and medication resistance in violent offenders"

Conclusion

Men were shown to be more likely to become violent than women, but the research showed that it is possible for anyone to respond in a violent fashion when sufficiently provoked. This type of reactive violence, though, is usually isolated and limited to a single episode. By contrast, instrumental violence is associated with core psychopathic characteristics and is not usually readily amenable to pharmacological interventions. In the final analysis, it is reasonable to conclude that humankind will always experience violence, but some people are more predisposed to engage in violent behaviors than others due in part to their personality traits.

You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.

130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime

Key Concepts in This Paper

Violence Predisposition Reactive Violence Instrumental Violence Psychopathy Personality Traits Aggression Risk Factors Mental Illness Gender Differences Pharmacological Intervention