Volkswagen Emissions Scandal: Diesel Market Economics
This paper examines the economic consequences of the Volkswagen emissions scandal, in which the company was found to have falsified diesel emissions tests. Using microeconomic concepts, the paper explores how fraudulent test results skewed EU tax policy in favor of diesel, artificially boosting demand for diesel vehicles. It then analyzes how a reversal of that tax policy would shift aggregate demand and aggregate supply in the diesel vehicle market, affect Volkswagen's comparative advantage, and force the company to adopt new competitive strategies—including price reductions and non-price incentives—to maintain market share in a declining segment.
- The Volkswagen Emissions Scandal and Its Context: Scandal overview and its regulatory implications
- Tax Policy, Market Equilibrium, and Diesel Demand: How tax policy distorted the diesel fuel market
- Short-Run and Long-Run Demand Effects: Demand shifts following a diesel tax policy reversal
- Supply Constraints and Production Challenges: Why vehicle supply cannot adjust as fast as demand
- Volkswagen's Competitive Strategy Going Forward: Volkswagen's options for regaining competitive advantage
- Utility, Non-Price Incentives, and Industry Competition: Non-price strategies and industry-wide competition
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It connects a real-world corporate scandal directly to core microeconomic concepts—aggregate demand, aggregate supply, equilibrium, comparative advantage, and utility—without losing sight of the underlying event.
- The argument builds logically: scandal → policy reversal → demand shift → supply lag → strategic response, giving the paper a clear cause-and-effect structure.
- It balances short-run and long-run analysis, acknowledging that consumers can respond faster than producers, which reflects genuine economic reasoning.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper applies standard microeconomic frameworks (supply and demand, equilibrium, comparative advantage) to a current business event rather than treating them abstractly. This applied analysis technique—grounding theory in a specific, named case—is a hallmark of undergraduate business economics writing and allows the author to draw concrete, testable conclusions rather than generic observations.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing the scandal and its regulatory context, then moves through four analytical layers: (1) how tax policy distorted the diesel market, (2) how a policy reversal affects demand in the short and long run, (3) why supply cannot adjust as quickly as demand, and (4) what strategic options remain for Volkswagen. The conclusion integrates utility theory and industry-level competition as alternative levers Volkswagen might pull.
The Volkswagen Emissions Scandal and Its Context
Volkswagen was found to have cheated on emissions tests for its vehicles—a deception the company ultimately admitted to. The falsified tests had shown that diesel fuel was cleaner than unleaded gasoline, which in turn resulted in favorable tax treatment for diesel across European markets. This tax advantage increased consumer demand for diesel vehicles, since they were more cost-competitive than gasoline-powered cars. With the admission that Volkswagen falsified these tests—and the resulting conclusion that unleaded gasoline is in fact the cleaner fuel—significant policy implications emerged, including the possible reversal of EU tax policy away from favoring diesel as an automotive fuel source.
Tax Policy, Market Equilibrium, and Diesel Demand
The market for fuels is typically subject to a range of regulations, and emissions standards are among the most consequential. In Europe in particular, tax policy on automotive fuels has been closely tied to environmental goals and emissions control. When tax policy is adjusted, it moves the fuel market away from its natural equilibrium. In this case, policy was shifted to favor diesel, which lowered the effective operating cost of diesel vehicles for consumers. As a result, diesel vehicles offered better value to European buyers and ultimately captured a very high share of the automobile market.
Short-Run and Long-Run Demand Effects
Should tax policy favoring diesel be reversed, this will have significant effects on both short-run and long-run demand for diesel vehicles. While the overall market for diesel fuel itself may not change dramatically in the short run, the market for diesel-powered vehicles is likely to respond more quickly. As consumers come to understand that gasoline vehicles are cheaper to operate over the long run under a revised tax regime, they will increasingly prefer those vehicles, thereby decreasing aggregate demand for diesel automobiles.
References
Kool, T. (2015). The Volkswagen scandal is bad news for diesel. Time Magazine. Retrieved September 29, 2015, from http://time.com/4048247/volkswagen-scandal-bad-diesel/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.