This paper examines the Washington D.C. Metropolitan Police Department (MPDC), one of the ten largest police organizations in the United States. It reviews the department's organizational structure, tracing authority from the Chief of Police through seven distinct bureaus: Patrol Services and School Security, Homeland Security, Professional Development, Administrative Services, Strategic Services, Investigative Services, and Internal Affairs. The paper also addresses challenges in officer recruitment and retention, efforts to serve Washington D.C.'s diverse multicultural communities, and the department's implementation of Customized Community Policing as a strategy for building sustainable public safety partnerships between law enforcement and residents.
The paper demonstrates effective use of institutional source documentation: it draws on official department publications, an academic textbook, and a RAND policy research interview to corroborate organizational claims. This multi-source approach strengthens descriptive accuracy while allowing the author to move from description toward critical assessment of gaps (e.g., the Ethiopian community language barrier).
The paper opens with historical context and significance before walking through each of the seven MPDC bureaus in sequence. It then pivots to thematic analysis of recruitment pressures, multicultural community relations, and the Customized Community Policing program. This structure — organizational survey followed by thematic evaluation — is a common and effective approach for law enforcement case studies at the undergraduate level.
Washington D.C. is the nation's capital and thus holds a special responsibility in terms of projecting an image of safety and upholding American ideals. The Metropolitan Police Department of Washington D.C. is charged with keeping that esteemed community safe. Today, the department ranks among the ten largest police organizations in the country (Metropolitan Police Department, 2012). Founded in 1861, the MPDC is on the forefront of technological crime-fighting advances, from highly developed breakthroughs in evidence analysis to state-of-the-art information technology (Metropolitan Police Department, 2012). Its organization is typical of local police agencies, with various bureaus operating under the control of the Chief of Police; yet the Metropolitan Police Department also faces its own unique set of challenges and rewards based on the distinct communities within its jurisdiction.
The organizational structure of the department is typical of other local police agencies in large urban areas. The Metropolitan Police Department includes more than 4,400 members — approximately 3,800 sworn police officers and more than 600 civilian employees (Metropolitan Police Department, 2012). The department is divided into seven bureaus (Metropolitan Police Department, 2011). The Chief of Police heads all of these bureaus, with Assistant Chiefs serving as the leaders of each one. The Chief of Police serves as the top commander within the department (Peak, 2012) and is supported by the Executive Office of the Chief of Police. Currently, the serving Chief of Police is Cathy Lanier.
The Chief of Police must focus on acting as the liaison to the public and to other government agencies, essentially serving as the primary spokesperson for the department as an organization. The Chief oversees department policies and practices and is also responsible for promoting ranking officers. That individual is supported by assistants, including the Agency Chief Fiscal Officer and the Assistant Chief Executive Officer, both of whom report directly to the Chief of Police.
One of the most crucial of the seven bureaus is the Patrol Services and School Security Bureau. Officers working in Washington D.C. face an uncertain environment. The city is a large urban area confronting gang violence, corporate crime, and numerous other major issues common to any large city. Yet the Metropolitan Police Department also faces the additional responsibility of protecting important members of the federal government. Patrol officers and detectives alike must factor in this extra consideration as they plan and implement policies and procedures in the face of the many dangers they encounter.
There are offices for the seven districts that comprise the Washington D.C. area, each including an administrative office, a vice unit, and various substations. Each of the seven districts has an Administrative Office, a Vice Unit, a Substation, and seven Police Service Area (PSA) groups. The Community Services/Special Projects Division includes the Special Projects Branch, the School Safety Branch with the Youth Advisory Council, and the Boys & Girls Club. Finally, there is the Special Liaison Division, comprised of the Language Access Programs Branch, the Asian Liaison Unit, the Deaf and Hard of Hearing Liaison Unit, the Gay and Lesbian Unit, and the Latino Liaison Unit.
The Homeland Security Bureau is made up of three main divisions. The Special Operations Division governs the Tactical Patrol Branch, Special Events Branch, Traffic Safety & Specialized Enforcement Branch, and Domestic Security Operations Branch. The Tactical Information Division is comprised of the Synchronized Operations Command Center Branch. Finally, the Intelligence Fusion Division consists of a series of task force teams focused on intelligence gathering.
The Professional Development Bureau is essentially the backbone of the department. It is divided into two primary groups: the Metropolitan Police Academy Division, which handles police training, and the Human Resource Management Division, which handles police recruitment and hiring. The Human Resource Management Division also oversees medical services and claims, as well as the Disciplinary Review Branch, which assesses disciplinary needs and processes within the organization.
Recently, a number of issues have confronted police recruitment and training. There is a heightened importance placed on effective recruitment and training measures (Peak, 2012). The Washington D.C. department is working to supply the appropriate number of police officers needed within the larger community. Yet, as research notes, "there was — and still is — a need, both operational and political, to hire more police officers" (RAND, 2009). This has placed the department under heavy pressure to hire officers quickly to fill existing gaps. The department has had difficulty attracting enough competent candidates to meet its needs. However, the recession has offered some positive elements in terms of recruitment, as one department captain noted: "It's a good government job; aside from the mission and the goals, it's one of the few jobs left that has a guaranteed retirement and healthcare" (RAND, 2009).
The department is primarily targeting younger demographics who are more technologically savvy and better acquainted with the innovative technologies the department is implementing. As the same captain observed, "We've gone after the technologically astute demographic, which happens to be a lot of younger people" (RAND, 2009). These individuals are typically between 20 and 25 years of age. Yet the department also stresses that this demographic is just one of its targets, and it remains open to candidates outside that age range who wish to enter the police force.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 4 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.