West Coast Transit Team Dynamics and Group Formation
This paper analyzes the West Coast Transit case study, in which a dysfunctional marketing team struggles to move beyond the first stage of Tuckman's Five Stages of Group Formation. Using frameworks from organizational behavior, the paper evaluates the team's effectiveness against criteria of productivity, personal satisfaction, and mutual commitment. It examines the behavioral roles each member occupies, explores substantive and emotional conflict, and recommends both direct and indirect conflict management approaches. The paper also applies Maslow's hierarchy of needs, Vroom's expectancy theory, and Skinner's reinforcement theory to diagnose the team's motivational failures and proposes concrete steps for the team leader to restore cohesion and progress.
- Introduction and Team Overview: Introduces dysfunctional West Coast Transit marketing team
- Effective Team and Group Work Criteria: Three criteria for evaluating effective teams
- Five Stages of Group Formation: Tuckman's stages and the team's stalled progress
- Behavioral Roles and Communication: Schein's roles and emotional intelligence gaps
- Conflict Types and Management Approaches: Substantive vs. emotional conflict and recommendations
- Motivation Theories Applied to the West Coast Transit Team: Maslow, Vroom, and Skinner applied to team motivation
- Conclusion: Steps to advance the team past the forming stage
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Consistently grounds observations in named theoretical frameworks — Tuckman's stages, Schein's behavioral roles, Maslow, Vroom, and Skinner — giving analytical depth to a case-based discussion.
- Moves systematically from diagnosis (what the team is doing wrong) to prescription (what each member should do differently), maintaining a clear problem–solution structure throughout.
- Applies multiple lenses — motivational, communicative, and relational — to the same case, demonstrating interdisciplinary organizational behavior analysis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies applied case analysis: theoretical concepts are introduced in general terms and then immediately mapped onto specific characters (Pete, Jing, Tanney, Mahonney), so abstract frameworks remain grounded in concrete evidence. This technique prevents theory sections from floating free of the case material.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief case overview, then evaluates team effectiveness, walks through Tuckman's five stages, identifies each member's behavioral role, discusses communication and emotional intelligence, distinguishes conflict types and recommends approaches, applies three motivation theories, and closes with a synthesis. Each section functions as a self-contained analytical unit while contributing to a cumulative argument about why the team is stalled and how it can advance.
Introduction and Team Overview
The West Coast Transit case study presents an example of a team at odds with itself. There is a lack of respect, appreciation, and shared purpose overall. The marketing team has been tasked with rescuing the company before its competition gains the upper hand in the marketplace. However, the team is simply not where it needs to be: Jing is leaving soon, Tanney has personal issues that are distracting her from work, Mahonney maintains composure but offers little in the way of genuine positivity, and Denson loses his temper entirely in his attempt to orient the team toward its goal.
This paper shows how the West Coast Transit team could get back on track by moving past the first stage of Tuckman's Five Stages of Group Development — the forming stage. The following sections analyze effective management at West Coast Transit with focus given to the stages of group formation, behavioral roles, communication, conflict and conflict management, and how motivational theories apply.
Effective Team and Group Work Criteria
The three criteria for evaluating an effective team are (a) productivity, (b) personal satisfaction, and (c) commitment to the members of the team (Schermerhorn & Uhl-Bien, 2014). Productive teams are those that achieve the goals assigned to them on time and within the limitations of their budget. Personal satisfaction refers to the joy that each team member derives from working within the team, and commitment refers to the extent to which team members support one another in achieving both the goals of the team and the goals of individual members. In order for a team to be effective and engage in group work successfully, it must demonstrate the ability to be productive, achieve a degree of personal satisfaction, and show that its members are supportive and committed to one another.
The West Coast Transit team fails to meet these criteria and is therefore ineffective. As Schermerhorn and Uhl-Bien (2014) point out, effective teams are motivated, share common values, support one another socially and emotionally, and are committed to meeting performance goals. The West Coast Transit team members all have too much going on individually to be truly productive as a unit. They are not personally invested in the project placed before them and are therefore unlikely to derive personal satisfaction from it; nor do they demonstrate support for or commitment to one another. Jing, for example, is taking a new job and will therefore be largely unaffected by the project's outcome. Tanney has personal problems requiring her attention. Pete shows no support or commitment toward Tanney. Mahonney's platitudes are insufficient to genuinely motivate the team. There is no sense of respect or appreciation among the team members.
Five Stages of Group Formation
The five stages of group formation are: (1) forming, (2) storming, (3) norming, (4) performing, and (5) adjourning. The first stage occurs when the members of the group initially meet — this is the forming stage. Members express their fears, concerns, worries, and issues to one another. This stage is necessary because it brings everything out into the open and provides members with the opportunity to demonstrate support for one another so that they can come together as one, as Schermerhorn and Uhl-Bien (2014) state is vital for teams. The West Coast Transit team is stuck at the forming stage: members are airing their anxieties, but no one is listening or providing support. There is no cohesion. Unless the team can achieve the goal of the forming stage — for members to respond positively to one another — it will not advance to the second stage. Pete has to be more sensitive and supportive toward Tanney; Jing has to demonstrate that she is still committed to the team even though her time is limited; and Mahonney has to step forward and volunteer to help rather than deflect responsibility back onto others.
Should the West Coast Transit team manage to accomplish this, it could move on to the storming stage — the stage where leaders emerge to guide the team in overcoming the challenges identified during forming. Following the emergence of leaders comes the third stage: the norming stage, in which team members assume their roles and responsibilities. Then comes the performing stage, in which the team works effectively to reach its goal. Finally, the adjourning stage follows, at which point the team has reached its goal and members express appreciation toward one another for their hard work and support.
Behavioral Roles and Communication
The three behavioral roles that can be identified on any team, according to Schein, are (a) the tough battler, (b) the friendly helper, and (c) the objective thinker (Schermerhorn, 2014). On the West Coast Transit team, Pete fills the role of the tough battler: his confrontational methods unintentionally upset Tanney. He intends only to get her focused, but he is jumping ahead — the team has not yet reached the storming stage. The friendly helper role belongs to Mahonney, though he fails to be truly helpful and instead comes across as superficial in his friendliness because he is unprepared and does not offer unconditional professional support. Jing is objective, but her objectivity is not tempered by warmth. At the forming stage, team members are most in need of emotional support.
Without effective communication, teamwork cannot be fostered and performance goals cannot be reached. One of the most important ways to facilitate effective communication is through emotional intelligence (Sanchez-Nunez, Patti, & Holzer, 2015). Emotional intelligence allows people — and leaders in particular — to understand the emotions of others and to identify the best way to communicate by demonstrating awareness and appreciation, thereby developing or strengthening relationships. Pete's problem is that he clearly lacks emotional intelligence: he should have recognized that a confrontational approach would only exacerbate the situation with Tanney. She was seeking understanding, and he lacked the emotional intelligence to respond effectively.
Conclusion
Every team goes through stages: the West Coast Transit team is stuck at the first stage, the forming stage. In order to move past it, the team needs to hold a basic listening session and then demonstrate genuine support for one another. The members must be led by Pete's example: he has to set the tone by asking his team what he can do to help them and what they would like in return for their commitment. This approach will help the team move past the initial hurdle and progress through the remaining four stages, ultimately reaching the accomplishment of their shared goal.
References
Maslow, A. H. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370.
Sanchez-Nunez, M., Patti, J., & Holzer, A. (2015). Effectiveness of a leadership development program that incorporates social and emotional intelligence for aspiring school leaders. Journal of Educational Issues, 1(1), 5–9.
Schermerhorn, J. (2014). Exploring management (4th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Schermerhorn, J., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2014). Organizational behavior (13th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.
Vroom, V. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.