This paper offers a critical assessment of Spencer Johnson's Who Moved My Cheese?, examining how the book's four characters — mice Sniff and Scurry, and people Hem and Haw — illustrate contrasting responses to change. The analysis explores the book's central metaphor of "cheese" as a stand-in for personal motivators such as career success, wealth, and security. Key lessons discussed include the dangers of complacency, the role of fear in resisting change, the value of teamwork in adapting quickly, and the importance of envisioning positive outcomes. The paper concludes that the book's core message — that change must be embraced from within — carries significant relevance for both personal development and organizational behavior.
The paper demonstrates analytical allegory interpretation — unpacking a fictional narrative to extract transferable principles. Rather than retelling the story, the writer maps each character to a type of change response and evaluates the author's success in delivering each lesson. This technique is especially useful in book assessments for business and management courses.
The paper opens with a narrative introduction that summarizes the book's premise and frames its analytical focus. A titled section then examines the book's purpose and central metaphor, followed by discussion of the two key questions the author uses to drive character behavior. Subsequent paragraphs analyze complacency, fear, teamwork, and visualization as change-management lessons. A brief conclusion synthesizes the major takeaways and ties them to contemporary relevance. The structure moves logically from context to analysis to synthesis.
While change is inevitable in everyone's life, the reaction we choose to change is entirely our own decision. Who Moved My Cheese? by Spencer Johnson begins with a class reunion where friends discuss how much their lives have changed since high school. The friends reflect on how their lives turned out completely different from what they had planned, each recalling how their decisions — some good, some bad — had defined where they were at that moment. Michael offers to tell the story of "Who Moved My Cheese," and the remainder of the book focuses on the narrative he provides.
Focusing on four characters — two mice, Sniff and Scurry, and two people, Hem and Haw — the story unfolds to show how people either anticipate and react positively to change or attempt to ignore it and resist change as inherently bad. From this foundational element, the author successfully demonstrates how personal change is critical for growth (Eriksen, 2008).
The cheese in the story serves as the catalyst for motivation in people's lives, whether it is money, an impressive professional position, free time, or possessions such as a large house, cars, or boats. When the "cheese" is disrupted, the story shows how individuals manage their reaction to change. The mice, Sniff and Scurry, anticipate change and quickly modify their behavior to find new cheese, while Hem is the epitome of what resistance to change looks like in a person. Haw, on the other hand, strikes out on his own to find cheese and writes the lessons he learns on the walls of the maze. In this way, the author creates an allegory of paying attention to the "handwriting on the wall" when it comes to managing change. This paper analyzes the major differences in how people manage change at a personal level.
The inevitability of change is illustrated throughout the book, with a strong focus on how a person's reaction is more important than the magnitude of the change itself. In essence, the author shows through examples that one's reaction to change matters more than the severity of the change. It is in interpreting change and choosing to internalize the necessary responses to it that the most adaptable and successful mindset is achieved (Eriksen, 2008). By choosing "cheese" as the metaphor for what drives and motivates people to achieve, the author successfully shows how internal conflicts can paralyze people who are resistant to change (Elias, 2009).
While it might have been more effective to first discuss what the "cheese" or motivators are that galvanize people before addressing resistance to change, the author instead assumes that these motivators are strong enough to make many people resist any change to their status quo — even in the face of obvious evidence. The author handles this well through the written lessons on the wall provided by Haw. He documents, in essence, the urgency for change through the lessons he learns as he travels through the maze. The "maze" represents the many strategies people use to gain their "cheese" — whatever reward they are pursuing. The relevance of the motivator, or cheese, is critical to the two basic premises of the book.
The attention to "cheese," or motivators, is also crucial to the two foundational questions at the heart of the book: "Why are you pursuing the goals you are pursuing?" and "What would you do if you were not influenced by fear?" Through the use of these two questions as the catalyst for the behaviors of the forward-thinking, change-accepting mice — Sniff and Scurry — versus the resistant character Hem, the author shows why the intrepid nature of Haw is critical for anyone looking to bring positive change into their lives. When all four characters are faced with responding to these questions, their reactions illustrate the range of responses people have to unwanted and often unforeseen change.
From these foundational elements of the story, the key lessons emerge. The author's handling of organizational and personal change management reflects well-established principles in the field, particularly the idea that proactive awareness of one's environment reduces the shock of disruption.
For the two characters for whom cheese is literal sustenance, change is a matter of survival. For the two people in the story, change is just as critical yet even more urgent given the complexity of their needs. The complacency and fear displayed by the character Hem is symptomatic of many people today, at a time when economic change is reordering entire industries within months rather than years. Ultimately, the book's message is that change must be embraced as an opportunity to learn more about one's inherent strengths and to find the path of greatest potential growth and achievement.
Elias, S. M. (2009). Employee commitment in times of change: Assessing the importance of attitudes toward organizational change. Journal of Management, 35(1), 37. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global database.
Eriksen, M. (2008). Leading adaptive organizational change: Self-reflexivity and self-transformation. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(5), 622–640. Retrieved from ABI/INFORM Global database.
You’re 52% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.