Wollstonecraft and Barbauld: Sensibility and Feminism Compared
This essay compares and contrasts the treatment of sensibility and feminism in Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Men and Anne Letitia Barbauld's "The Rights of Woman." It examines how Wollstonecraft challenges Edmund Burke's gendered rhetoric by redefining the "sublime" and "beautiful" and advocating for rational, republican feminism, while Barbauld responds to Wollstonecraft's feminist agenda through an ambiguous poem that simultaneously endorses and questions women's rights. The essay considers each writer's approach to sensibility, moral worth, and gender equality, situating both texts within the broader Revolutionary-era pamphlet debates and exploring why Barbauld is often misread as anti-feminist despite her nuanced, progressive stance.
- Introduction: Introduces Wollstonecraft, Barbauld, and their texts
- Wollstonecraft's Sensibility and Challenge to Burke: Wollstonecraft redefines sublime and beautiful against Burke
- Barbauld's Feminism and Political Thought: Barbauld's progressive politics and non-conformist tradition
- Barbauld's Response to Wollstonecraft: Barbauld's poem as satirical reply to Wollstonecraft
- Ambiguity and Contradiction in Barbauld's Poem: Barbauld's contradictory stance on feminism and rights
- Conclusion: Similarities and differences in both authors' sensibility
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay grounds its comparative analysis in close reading, citing extended quotations from primary texts to substantiate claims about sensibility and rhetoric rather than relying on paraphrase alone.
- It draws on established scholarly voices — particularly Claudia Johnson and Harriet Guest — to frame the interpretive debate, lending credibility to its reading of both Wollstonecraft and Barbauld.
- The paper honestly acknowledges interpretive difficulty, noting that Barbauld's poem resists definitive answers and that its ambiguity is itself a significant feature, which gives the argument intellectual honesty.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The essay models the compare-and-contrast method effectively at the thematic level: rather than treating each author in isolation, it shows how Barbauld's poem is in direct dialogue with Wollstonecraft's texts, and how both authors deploy sensibility as a contested political and rhetorical category. This dialogic framing — tracing a chain of textual responses from Burke to Wollstonecraft to Barbauld — demonstrates how to embed individual works within a broader literary controversy.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an introduction identifying both authors and their texts, then devotes a substantial body section to Wollstonecraft's critique of Burke, including analysis of her redefinition of the "sublime" and "beautiful." A second body section introduces Barbauld's political and literary context, followed by analysis of her poem as a response to Wollstonecraft. The essay then addresses Barbauld's ambiguity and the anti-feminist charge before a brief conclusion summarizing convergences and divergences.
Introduction
Mary Wollstonecraft, a British liberal feminist of the 18th century, authored A Vindication of the Rights of Men. She wrote it as a letter to the Right Honourable Edmund Burke in response to his Reflections on the Revolution in France (1790), published just a few weeks after Burke's text appeared. The letter attacks advocates of aristocracy and hereditary privilege. It constitutes the pamphlet war's (the Revolution Controversy, 1789–1795) first major response to Burke's publication, which had defended aristocracy, constitutional monarchy, and the Church of England. Unlike Burke's other detractors, Wollstonecraft deplored his gendered language in a distinctive way, appropriating the terms "beautiful" and "sublime" from his earlier work, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and Beautiful (1756). Her first feminist critique indicts Burke's justification of social equality as resting on female passivity — a critique that Wollstonecraft scholar Claudia Johnson describes as unmatched in its argumentative force.
Anne Letitia Barbauld, on the other hand, published her first poetic collection in 1773. She wrote "The Rights of Woman" as a response to Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792). Her poem is not straightforward, however: it seems simultaneously to question and to celebrate Wollstonecraft's views on liberating women from societal restrictions and injustice. Barbauld is regarded as an early Romantic and an important poet of her era. Wollstonecraft's work is explicitly feminist, while Barbauld's is not, though her poem does incorporate feminist characteristics. The aim of this essay is to compare and contrast the views of sensibility expressed in Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Men and Barbauld's "The Rights of Woman."
Bibliography
Barbauld, Mrs. The Poems of Anna Letitia Barbauld. University of Georgia Press, 1994.
Berges, Sandrine. The Routledge Guidebook to Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman. Routledge, 2013.
Craciun, Adriana. Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: A Sourcebook. Routledge, 2013.
Ferguson, Moira. "Mary Wollstonecraft and the Problematic of Slavery." Feminist Review 42, no. 1 (1992): 82–102.
Linkin, Harriet Kramer, and Stephen C. Behrendt. Romanticism and Women Poets: Opening the Doors of Reception. University Press of Kentucky, 1999.
McCarthy, William. Anna Letitia Barbauld: Voice of the Enlightenment. Johns Hopkins University Press, 2008.
Mellor, Anne K. "The Female Poet and the Poetess: Two Traditions of British Women's Poetry, 1780–1830." In Women's Poetry in the Enlightenment, pp. 81–98. Palgrave Macmillan, London, 1999.
Sapiro, Virginia. A Vindication of Political Virtue: The Political Theory of Mary Wollstonecraft. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Turner, Cheryl. Living by the Pen: Women Writers in the Eighteenth Century. Routledge, 2002.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.