This paper examines the complex and often counterintuitive relationship between economic development and women's status in developing countries. Drawing on feminist modernization theory and case studies from Cameroon, Pakistan, and India, the paper argues that conventional development programs frequently marginalize women rather than improve their standing. Mechanization of agriculture, unequal access to education and training, and labor market segmentation all deepen gender gaps. The paper reviews country-specific solutions — including trade unions, microfinance, and entrepreneurship programs — and concludes that sustainable progress requires women to be active participants in the development process itself.
Sometimes what appears logical does not reflect actual reality. This is the case with women's status and the economic development of a country. In most instances, Gross National Product (GNP) is considered the primary parameter for economic growth, and as GNP improves, so too does the free market system. But what about the impact on women in this situation? Does an improved market equate to better status for women? It is logical to think so, but this is not always the case.
Clark and Clark's (80) feminist theory suggests that modernization may limit rather than improve the status of women. In developing countries, women may have to recognize "a fairly unhappy set of alternatives in continuing their subordinate status in patriarchal cultures or facing the considerable chance of having their position eroded, not enhanced, by conventional development programs." When agriculture becomes more mechanized, women's role and importance in this area of production decreases. Women are marginalized or confined to low-paying, unskilled manufacturing jobs.
Since improved techniques are normally monopolized by men, economic development increases the gap between men and women. Boys receive training, which furthers the gap, and women cannot compete equally for employment due to differences in skill level. Furthermore, since males are typically the first to gain access to education, the gap widens further — narrowing only later, once educating females also becomes possible, but never closing completely (Tinker, 25).
In Cameroon, modernization produced some benefits for women, but the harms of modernization far outweigh the gains (Nana-Fabu). As a result, Cameroon women hold economically uncertain positions at the bottom of the socio-economic scale, with limited access to and lack of control over resources such as education and bank loans. The vast majority of Cameroon women, regardless of educational level, find themselves in a disadvantaged position in the economic sphere. In fact, education does not make much of a difference in status level, and gender discrimination persists throughout the economic sector. The segmentation of the labor market reflects biases attached to the potential employees rather than to the jobs themselves.
Nana-Fabu argues that women need to organize trade unions to fight exploitation. Women could establish their own banks, which would restore self-confidence, independence, leadership, and control over their own destinies — comparable to or better than conditions in pre-colonial times. In addition, training in new agricultural technologies needs to be provided to female farmers in rural and urban areas, and a comprehensive review of urban and rural development policies, based on the full range of tasks performed by Cameroon women, must be developed. As Nana-Fabu concludes, "development programs should be gender sensitive" (152).
Similarly, in Pakistan, women participate in productive economic efforts in both rural and urban areas, inside and outside the home. Yet they are constrained by seclusion and limited mobility, which prevent them from accessing information and opportunities such as skill training and credit. Women's work therefore remains arduous and tedious, their productive potential unrealized, and their quality of life substandard. According to Jehan, solutions to improving this situation include enhancing data on women's economic participation and increasing the proportion of women in education, rural income generation, and productivity programs.
In India, a number of economic initiatives have been undertaken to address women's role and status. These include access to the Meerut Seva Samaj (MSS), an entrepreneurship program that allows women to engage in home-based work, enabling them to fulfill domestic responsibilities while also contributing financially to their families. Financial institutions, companies, and NGOs are discovering the impact that can be made by extending various forms of entrepreneurial assistance — such as micro-credit, or small loans — to women-run startup businesses. MSS demonstrates the way Indian women, particularly those in rural areas, can become successful entrepreneurs with the support of resources such as technology and training. MSS also gives communities the opportunity to use biogas (gas derived from organic matter), a safe and environmentally friendly energy source that improves both the environment and the fertility of rural land.
"Education, credit, and unions as remedies"
More importantly, women need to become active participants in the economic development process itself and seek ways to improve their situation over time. It cannot be left to men to determine how to improve the lives of women. Relying on a male-dominated system to remedy gender inequality only perpetuates the hierarchical structures that brought women to this lower level in the first place. Genuine and lasting progress requires that women themselves hold agency over the decisions and programs that shape their economic futures.
You’re 81% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.