Woolaroc Gallery and the Colonial Gaze on Native Americans
This reflection paper recounts a visit to the Woolaroc Museum and Wildlife Preserve's art gallery in Oklahoma, focusing on its collection of paintings associated with the Taos School. The author examines how European-American artists such as William Leigh and Robert Lindeaux depicted Native Americans, analyzing the tension between sympathetic representation and colonial "othering." Drawing on scholarship by Berlo and Phillips and Caldwell's work on manifest destiny and whiteness, the paper argues that while some paintings transcend objectification to function as social and political protest, others reinforce the "noble savage" stereotype. The paper concludes that such works remain important visual-historical documents capable of prompting critical anti-colonial discourse.
- Introduction: A Visit to Woolaroc Gallery: Author visits Woolaroc and encounters Taos School paintings
- The Colonial Gaze and the Objectification of Native Americans: Theoretical framework on othering and colonial appropriation
- William Leigh's 'Visions of Yesterday': Mourning and Empathy: Leigh's empathetic depiction of Native displacement and loss
- William Leigh's 'Navajo Fire Dance': Exoticism and the Noble Savage: Leigh's more colonial, exoticizing portrayal of Navajo ceremony
- Robert Lindeaux's 'The Trail of Tears': Art as Historical Documentation: Lindeaux documents forced displacement as moral protest
- Conclusion: Art, Colonialism, and Anti-Colonial Discourse: Art as vehicle for critical anti-colonial engagement
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds abstract theoretical concepts — such as "othering" and colonial appropriation — in concrete visual analysis of specific paintings, making the argument both accessible and persuasive.
- It maintains a balanced critical stance, acknowledging when artists transcend colonial stereotypes (Leigh's "Visions of Yesterday," Lindeaux's "Trail of Tears") while still identifying their limitations.
- The first-person, reflective voice is used purposefully to signal the writer's own positionality as a viewer and to model critical engagement with art.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates close visual analysis as an academic method: the author reads compositional elements (chiaroscuro, foreground placement of spectators, symbolic objects such as the skull and feather headdress) as evidence for broader claims about ideology and power. This technique — treating visual details as textual evidence — is characteristic of art history and cultural studies writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a first-person scene-setting introduction that contextualizes the visit and establishes the central tension. It then builds a theoretical framework using two secondary sources before moving through three painting-by-painting analyses arranged to show a spectrum of colonial attitudes. A synthesizing conclusion draws the analyses together into a broader argument about art, colonialism, and historical responsibility.
Introduction: A Visit to Woolaroc Gallery
Starting around noon, I visited the art gallery at the Woolaroc property. The property itself is a sprawling celebration of the landscape and wildlife unique to this part of North America; there are herds of buffalo on the grounds, although we did not see any when we arrived. I headed straight to the gallery, which is locally renowned for its collection of paintings from the Taos School. Many of the artists on display I had heard of before, and I was eager to encounter their work firsthand — and was not disappointed. Although I relished the paintings for their objective aesthetic beauty, I came away from the experience with profound mixed feelings about the way Native Americans have been appropriated as subjects by white artists.
The Colonial Gaze and the Objectification of Native Americans
The objectification of Native Americans in European-American art parallels their subjugation as a people. Caldwell (n.d.) points out the "longstanding history and tradition of America's investment in 'othering' Native Americans." Even when that "othering" obviously reflects a potent sense of respect for the "other," the fact remains that these are European-American perceptions of the people they encountered — not the voices of Native Americans themselves. Berlo and Phillips (1998) similarly address the colonial appropriation of Native art, which, although distinct from colonial interpretation of Native life, carries the same connotation. I would have appreciated a juxtaposition of art by Native Americans depicting the white people they encountered. Nevertheless, I wanted first to appreciate the work at face value, respecting that the artists featured in the gallery were constrained by their own cultural and historical milieu and its attendant biases.
William Leigh's 'Visions of Yesterday': Mourning and Empathy
On display at the Woolaroc gallery was William Leigh's striking "Visions of Yesterday," in which the painter uses chiaroscuro to depict the last moments of sunlight on the landscape. An old Native man, who appears exhausted after a day's work plowing the fields with his two workhorses, gazes down at an animal skull. The scene is particularly striking because it suggests that the artist actually understands his subject. This is more than a typical European attempt to romanticize the Indian as the "noble savage." Here we see a man — too old to be performing back-breaking labor — staring at a symbol of the vestiges of his own cultural past. He is alone, bereft of community and culture. He wears jeans, a marker of European-American clothing and culture. His feather headdress is the only visible evidence of his connection to his people. The combination of the setting sun, the skull, and the weariness in the man's posture signal a profound sadness. I believe that Leigh actually mourns the genocide of Native Americans in this painting.
Conclusion: Art, Colonialism, and Anti-Colonial Discourse
Seeing Native Americans through the eyes of Europeans is an act of symbolic colonialism. The Indian is rendered as an exotic "other" who has no voice and who is objectified and subjected to judgment and discrimination. However, some artists manage to move beyond this objectification to make a genuine statement about the relationship between colonizer and colonized. Engagement with the art of the Southwest reveals how European-Americans grapple with their own role as spectators in a land that belongs to Native peoples. Even when those peoples have been displaced — as the Creek and Cherokee were displaced to Oklahoma — they are forced to form new communities of resistance. A visit to the Woolaroc gallery reveals the complex relationship between artists and their objectified subjects. The paintings have become important visual-historical objects, and vehicles through which viewers can engage in critical commentary and anti-colonial discourse.
References
Berlo, J. C., & Phillips, R. B. (1998). An introduction to the indigenous arts of North America. In Native North American Art. Oxford University Press.
Caldwell, E. C. (n.d.). Playing "Indian": Manifest Destiny, whiteness, and the depiction of Native Americans. Retrieved from http://arthistoryteachingresources.org/lessons/playing-indian-manifest-destiny-whiteness-and-the-depiction-of-native-americans/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.