This paper examines the ethical dilemma faced by a manager named Joan, who must decide how to respond to unproven allegations of drug use against a unionized employee, Tim, following a workplace accident. The paper analyzes the hierarchy of competing interests — shareholder protection, union-management relations, and personal career concerns — and the limitations imposed by union contracts and the absence of formal investigation. It concludes by recommending an informal resolution strategy combined with a proactive policy proposal for future union negotiations, arguing that this approach best serves the company's short-term and long-term interests.
When considering what actions Joan should take with respect to Tim, she needs to set priorities. As a manager, she must protect the interests of the company's owners — shareholders — first and foremost. This alone creates a dilemma, since there will clearly be short-term negative financial consequences if an investigation is launched; however, if Tim were to cause another, more serious accident in the future, the long-term consequences could be far greater. Managerial decision-making under competing pressures often requires weighing immediate costs against long-term organizational risk, as Joan must do here.
The internal issues surrounding union-management relations are a secondary concern, in that they can indirectly affect overall company performance. Joan's own career represents a tertiary concern — though understandably many managers ascribe higher value to it, given that they are subject to at-will employment and therefore have a vested interest in placing their personal interests above all else.
The official channels in this case are effectively closed. There has been no formal investigation, and there is no legal reason to pursue the matter further. Moreover, given the terms of the union contract, there is little in the way of serious consequence that could follow for Tim even if an investigation were to find the allegations true. It is also worth noting that Joan has limited ability to prove the allegations a week after the fact. Collective bargaining agreements often restrict an employer's disciplinary options, a constraint that Joan must account for when determining her strategy.
"Informal resolution and future policy reform strategy"
You’re 61% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.