Workplace Ethics: Navigating Sales Pressure and Moral Dilemmas
This reflection paper examines two distinct workplace ethical dilemmas encountered firsthand. The first scenario involves navigating aggressive sales competition at a jewelry store, where the author learns to adapt by building customer rapport and communicating concerns to management. The second scenario addresses the moral tension of working at a computer store where the owner sold refurbished electronics as new. Drawing on concepts from Mary Gentile's "Giving Voice to Values," the paper explores what factors were within and outside the author's control, the reasoning behind speaking up in one situation and staying silent in another, and the broader lessons learned about adaptation, communication, and ethical decision-making in workplace settings.
- Introduction: Facing an Unfamiliar Sales Environment: New salesperson struggles with high jewelry store targets
- Competing With Sharks: Stress and Adaptation in Jewelry Sales: Aggressive coworkers steal sales, creating workplace stress
- Manager Guidance and the Power of Customer Loyalty: Manager advises building rapport to retain customers
- Ethical Silence: Selling Refurbished Electronics as New: Author stays silent about owner's deceptive inventory practices
- Weighing Consequences and Staying in Control: Author identifies controllable actions to ease ethical discomfort
- Lessons Learned From Both Workplace Experiences: Reflection on adaptation, communication, and ethical judgment
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds abstract ethical concepts in concrete personal experience, making the moral reasoning easy to follow and credible.
- It consistently distinguishes between factors within and outside the author's control — a structural move that reflects genuine ethical analysis rather than simple storytelling.
- The two scenarios are meaningfully contrasted: one where speaking up was the right choice, and one where staying silent was the reasoned decision, demonstrating nuanced ethical thinking.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper applies a "locus of control" framework — explicitly identifying what the author could and could not influence — to justify each ethical response. This technique, associated with Mary Gentile's Giving Voice to Values approach, shows students how to move from feeling overwhelmed by an ethical situation to identifying actionable responses. Rather than treating ethics as a binary right/wrong judgment, the author uses contextual reasoning to explain why the same person makes different choices in different situations.
Structure breakdown
The paper is divided into two clearly labeled parts. Part 1 traces a problem-response-outcome arc across the jewelry store experience: the sales goal challenge, the competitive environment, the manager's advice, and the resulting adaptation. Part 2 follows a similar arc for the computer store scenario but arrives at a different ethical conclusion. Both parts close with explicit reflections on lessons learned, giving the paper a consistent analytical rhythm throughout.
Introduction: Facing an Unfamiliar Sales Environment
While working at a jewelry company, I was asked to meet certain sales goals. I was new and unfamiliar with the practices of the other salespeople and did not know how to approach the assigned target. The goal was set high — comparable to those given to more seasoned employees. I was concerned about being dismissed for insufficient sales while also lacking the techniques and charisma that the longer-tenured salespeople had developed over time.
During one of our weekly meetings, I asked the manager whether he could lower my goal so that I might have a realistic chance of meeting it while also giving me more time to grow accustomed to pitching and selling to customers. The manager was initially resistant but agreed to set a slightly lower target. He added, however, that if I failed to reach even that reduced goal, he might have to replace me altogether. According to Mary Gentile's framework in Giving Voice to Values, identifying what is within one's control and taking action accordingly is central to ethical workplace behavior — a principle I would come to understand through direct experience.
I accepted the new goal and began working toward it. What I did not anticipate was the additional obstacle that would arise from within my own team.
Competing With Sharks: Stress and Adaptation in Jewelry Sales
The problem that emerged came from competition with the other salespeople in the store. My coworkers were, in the most direct sense, sharks. If I was attending to a customer — stepping away briefly to clean a piece of jewelry or process a transaction — some of them would approach my customer, offer additional services, and effectively insert themselves into my sale. This not only reduced my numbers but also forced me to work significantly harder just to keep pace with my reduced goal.
The experience generated considerable stress. If I wanted to meet my target, I felt compelled to mirror the behavior of the other salespeople — to compete aggressively, speak up assertively when they attempted to take my customers, and sometimes pursue theirs. This conflicted deeply with my values. I am not a competitive person by nature, and I place a strong emphasis on fairness. Having to engage in that kind of daily competition took a real toll on my well-being.
The stress eventually reached a point where I felt I had no choice but to raise my concerns again. At the next weekly meeting, I addressed the situation with my manager directly, explaining how the behavior of certain coworkers was affecting both my sales numbers and my health.
References
Gentile, M. (2010). Giving voice to values. Yale University Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.