343), meaning that almost all of the students were not at all familiar with reflective writing techniques and decided to adhere to a format more in line with what the teacher expected or preferred. Another result is that 55% of the submitted journals appear to have become more critical and self-reflective toward the end of the course, an indication that these students had actually become more proficient as reflective writers as a result of keeping a record of their thoughts and achievements.
As to strengths and weaknesses related to the article, it is clear that Langer is a master of academic extrapolation, due to his ability to write about and discuss rather complicated data and information. However, his writing style is not so overwhelmingly congested with extrapolation to the point of becoming unreadable, as is the case with other academic essays written by some very prominent scholars. Langer also chose to use bullet headings as a way of separating his basic ideas from the rest of the text, such as in the first section of his research methods.
Langer also includes some of the questions that were asked of the students during the interview process, one being their reaction to the requirement to keep a learning journal-
"reactions were mixed and sometimes prejudicial. . . one student felt insulted," feeling that journal writing "seems better suited children" (2002, p. 344). As to weaknesses, after a very close reading of Langer's article, there appears to be none, due to the fact that Langer's academic style provides all of the proper data and information needed to understand his argument without cluttering up the page with redundant facts and figures.
Reflectively speaking, Langer's excellent article provides a new glimpse into...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now