Cyberwarfare Like Terrorism, Cyber-Warfare Changes Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
591
Cite

Herein lies one of the political implications of cyber-warfare. Because cyber-warfare is trans-national, global efforts to prevent cyber crimes must be global in scope and cooperative in nature. Nations do have information warfare capabilities that can be harnessed preemptively as well as defensively (Knapp & Bolton 2006). However, to harness the capabilities of state-sponsored cyber warfare tools, the norms of neutrality need to be rewritten (Kelsey 2008). Finally, the social impacts of cyber-warfare are in many ways similar to the impacts of terrorism. The nebulous fear from unidentifiable non-state actors has a tremendous impact on social life and how individuals use information technology. Consumers are concerned about the protection of private data, such as banking information. Cyber-warfare can potentially dismantle entire organizations, and disrupt essential services. Given the push to digitalize medical records, the health of human beings is also at stake.

Cyber-warfare offers potential for new and innovative...

...

Law enforcement responses to cyber-warfare will be among the most critical within localized jurisdictions, whereas trans-state responses to cyber-warfare will require the cooperation of multiple organizations. This makes responses to cyber-warfare politically tricky and potentially problematic. Combatting trans-state cyber-warfare requires also the cooperation of the private sector too. The private and public sectors must collaborate on creative ways of harnessing the power of information technology in cyber-warfare in order to protect the end user.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Kelsey, J.T.G. (2008). Note: Hacking into international humanitarian law: The principles of distinction and neutrality in the age of cyber warfare. Michigan Law Review.

Knapp, K.J. & Boulton, W.R. (2006). Cyber-warfare threatens corporations: expansion into commercial environments. ISM Journal.

Wik, M.W. (n.d.). Revolution in information affairs.


Cite this Document:

"Cyberwarfare Like Terrorism Cyber-Warfare Changes" (2011, May 08) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cyberwarfare-like-terrorism-cyber-warfare-44404

"Cyberwarfare Like Terrorism Cyber-Warfare Changes" 08 May 2011. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cyberwarfare-like-terrorism-cyber-warfare-44404>

"Cyberwarfare Like Terrorism Cyber-Warfare Changes", 08 May 2011, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/cyberwarfare-like-terrorism-cyber-warfare-44404

Related Documents

Technology changed Security and Terrorism? Terrorists have evolved in their warfare and now they exploit modern technologies to facilitate every stage of their operation such as recruitment, training, planning and attack. Counter terrorism efforts therefore require more effort, continued research and high tech solutions to prevent, protect and to safeguard innocent citizens. The key to victory is not just the volume of information at our disposal but more importantly how

To a greater degree than at any point in history, individuals and small groups, from nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) on the one hand to criminal networks and terrorist organizations on the other, have the ability to engage the world with far-reaching effects, including those that are disruptive and destructive (Quadrennial Homeland Security Review Report: A Strategic Framework for a Secure Homeland, 2010). When considering all the forces that threaten the United

Cyber Terrorism
PAGES 13 WORDS 4455

Cyber Terrorism The Internet that we know today and use in our everyday lives was founded in the early 1970s. But all through the Cold War, the apprehension of data theft led to the Internet becoming a decentralized system. But it was not until the late 1980s when the Internet, after years and years of research was made available to public. This was a big change because now anyone in the

Question 1:  Can all non-state actor threats be addressed unilaterally as a non-traditional threat to only one country?  Do some of these non-traditional threats span borders and require international cooperation to counter the threat?  If so, why? What problems might such cooperation bring? Of course, it is possible for state actors to unilaterally address non-state actor threats. Whether it is advisable for state actors to unilaterally address non-state actor threats is

S. Department of Defense (DOD) uses over two million computers and more than ten thousand local area networks, most of which are linked to, and vulnerable to attack from, users of the larger Internet. (2008, p. 276) These increasing threats correspond to the growing reliance on information systems to manage the entire spectrum of modern commerce and energy resources, making the disruption of a single element in the integrated system a

.." (Chenoweth and Clarke, 2006) These performance regimes are required to take part in three challenges stated to be the challenges associated with: 1) Overcoming asymmetrical incentives and enlist diverse stakeholders around a collective local security goal despite varying perceptions of its immediacy; 2) Persuading participants to sustain their involvement in the face of competing demands, and 3) Overcoming collective action problems to create a durable coalition around performance goals necessary to