Understanding Leadership Research Paper

¶ … Leadership The theories of leadership advanced by Max Weber, James MacGregor Burns and Daniel Goleman are some of the most influential and sophisticated notions in the field of leadership. Some of the ideas denoted by these men have an intrinsic link to one another, such as both Weber and Burns' conception of transactional and transformative leaders. The philosophical espousing of this triumvirate have directly influenced many of the ideas of contemporary leadership philosophers, and have largely set the stage for modern day notions of leadership as both an academic and pragmatic field of interest. The positive and negative attributes of their theories are examined in the subsequent paragraphs.

Weber's most outstanding contribution to the field of leadership was his initial conceptualization of leadership largely hinging upon both context and circumstance. This realization of Weber's allows for a fluidity and flexibility in leadership that varies upon whatever sort of situation a leader finds himself in and what his own personal strengths and attributes are. In alignment with this notion, Weber delineated three archetypes of leaders with accordant values: those of the bureaucratic, charismatic, and traditional leader. Again, the true value in this theory of leadership is that a good leader will adopt these poses with a prudence that is based upon whatever situation in which he finds himself.

These leadership types can be stratified into a pair of paradigms that apply to leadership -- those that are transactional and those that...

...

The latter of these largely pertains to charismatic leaders, who generally possess innate qualities that can inspire and compel people to follow them. Therefore, these type of leaders can set precedents in policy and in approach to leading others -- since they largely have the charisma and personality traits to inspire confidence in people to adhere to them in unconventional settings and ways (Williams, no date). Bureaucratic leadership, or that which is of legal-rational authority, is an example of transactional leadership in which rulers employ an intrinsic knowledge of legal procedures and codes to govern others. This type of leadership is considerably more static than transactional leadership. Examples of traditional leadership include patriarchies and have rigid caste systems in which there are clear distinctions between "born" followers and leaders.
Interestingly enough, many of the tenets of leadership theory that are important to James Macgregor Burns have a direct correlation to those denoted by Weber. Burns is primarily known for his work in transformational leadership theory (London, 2008), in which he defined a number of different types of leaders and accordant styles including a charismatic leader. However, the principle positive attribute associated with Burns' work in transformational leadership theory has to do with the sense of mores he associates with it. Burns' conception of transformational leadership is largely based on a preoccupation with moral behavior and the pursuit of virtues that are best categorized…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R., McKee, A. (2001). "Primal Leadership: The Hidden Drive of Great Performance." Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://waldorf.nexlearn.com/harvard/c3eilb/course3tools/LTEI_8296p2_PrimalLeadership.pdf

London, S. (2008). "Book Review." Scott London. Retrieved from http://www.scottlondon.com/reviews/burns.html

Williams, D. (No date). "Max Weber: Traditional, Legal-Rational, and Charismatic Authority." Tripod. Retrieved from http://danawilliams2.tripod.com/authority.html


Cite this Document:

"Understanding Leadership" (2012, June 28) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/understanding-leadership-65174

"Understanding Leadership" 28 June 2012. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/understanding-leadership-65174>

"Understanding Leadership", 28 June 2012, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/understanding-leadership-65174

Related Documents

Leadership by Gayle C. Avery In many ways, Gayle C. Avery's Understanding Leadership was written as and functions as a textbook. The author's primary purpose in composing this manuscript was to elucidate the myriad principles of leadership in a highly stratified manner so that its core concepts are readily identifiable and accessible to the average layman. Yet the methodology that the author incorporates into her approach to writing this book

Leadership in Telecommuting Teams Leading a Changing World In paper, exploring emerging topic challenge leadership changing world work. Choose a specific topic Module 12.4 Landy Conte (2013). Provide overview topic, including: - Why chose topic - Why topic important study leadership, field I/O psychology, career; - And a review research articles focusing topic. Telecommuting is increasingly becoming a concern for teams in organizations around the world. Many organizations have virtual teams because

Leadership, according to La Monica (1938), is when a person has authority that is recognized by others, and the person has followers/subordinates under them, who believe that the person will assist them in attaining certain goals (carrying out specific objectives for the followers). Furthermore, anyone that is willing to assist and help others could be referred to as a leader (p.8) Leaders see what others do not Most leaders have

Leadership At the core of leadership is the interaction between the leader and the follower. Much of leadership theory can be understood in terms of how leaders and followers interact and what the underlying assumptions are with respect to the roles and nature of leadership. Because of the many different types of leaders, and successful examples thereof, leadership scholarship has developed multiple branches that seek to explain leadership, but no one

However, Avery points out an important shift in managerial leadership styles. She sees it as a shift in the balance of power within an organization, rather than a shift in the way managers perform their daily tasks. She states, leadership involves letting go of conventional notions of control, order, and hierarchy, replacing them with trust and an acceptance of continual change, chaos, and respect for diverse members of the

Organizational transformation, once seldom required, is now required frequently in many organizations. This places increased emphasis on the importance of leaders with transformational skills. The other way in which globalization has impacted leadership is the increased need for "soft" skills. The human element of leadership was virtually irrelevant during the early 20th century, as labor was viewed as little more than a commodity. However -- and in particular in