Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Aristotle differentiated friendships of pleasure from friendships of utility by virtue of the fact that the former are based on preferences and shared interests whereas the latter are based on specific needs that exist irrespective of preferences and interests. For example, the friendship between shopkeepers and their customers is based on a reciprocal need: the shopkeeper has a need for the patronage of the customer to support himself and the customer has a need for the goods sold by the shopkeeper. In most cases, neither of those individuals has any choice or control over the need that generates the friendship. Conversely, in friendships of pleasure, the individuals involved typically choose their respective interests that they share with their counterparts in the friendship and that form the basis of that relationship (Magill & McGreal, 1981).
Whereas Aristotle characterizes friendships of utility as most natural among the elderly, he suggested that friendships of pleasure are most natural to young people. While the first suggestion may or may not be entirely accurate, one could easily conclude that the second suggestion is extremely accurate, even today (or, perhaps, especially today). For example, children typically form friendships based on nothing more than the physical proximity of their homes or their attendance of the same classes. Childhood friendships are largely identical even among many different pairs of friends and they are relatively easily formed and terminated, such as by relocation of transfers to new schools. Likewise, teenagers often form friendships and select their friends from their many acquaintances based on superficialities such as appreciation for similar music or sports interests.
Aristotle argues that, as a result, friendships of pleasure are equally superficial and, much like friendships of utility, are formed and ended quickly, and they are relatively easily exchanged (Magill & McGreal, 1981). Aristotle's views of friendships of pleasure would also appear to be highly applicable to contemporary friendships among individuals whose principal motivation or inspiration for friendship is a shared interest in an external pursuit or recreational activity. In that regard, it differs from friendship of utility only in the former reflects a mutual satisfaction of a need that is not necessarily chosen by the individuals while the latter often reflects autonomous choice in the specific interest shared by the friends. It may be the source of significant joy and may certainly be the source of much needed companionship, it is, nevertheless, a superficial form of friendship precisely because it reflects an arbitrary external commonality.
Friendship of Virtue
According to Aristotle, a friendship of virtue represents the most significant friendship relationship and one in which the individuals contribute and derive the greatest possible benefit of human friendships (Hursthouse, 1999; Magill & McGreal, 1981). That is because, unlike friendships of utility or pleasure, the predominant source and inspiration of friendships of virtue is the shared philosophical, ethical, or religious basis of the relationship. Whereas friendships or utility and pleasure are dependent on superficial or arbitrarily chosen commonalities, friendships of virtue necessarily derive directly from that which is most important to the respective individuals on a fundamental or spiritual level. Therefore, whereas friendships based on superficialities are formed and often easily substituted or abruptly terminated, friendships of virtue grow more slowly and much more difficult to exchange for comparable friendships, and they do not often end abruptly (Magill & McGreal, 1981; Rosenstand, 2008).
They provide the greatest value to the individuals involved because they are based in the substantive beliefs and values of the individuals rather than on superficial circumstances such as external needs or arbitrary choices of pleasures (Magill & McGreal, 1981). The contemporary equivalent of Aristotle's friendships of virtue would be friendships generated by shared values, such as political or religious philosophies or mutual commitments to other shared core values and belief systems that are integral parts of the respective individual's lives.
Egner, R.E. And Denonn, L.E. (1961). The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Hursthouse, R. (1999). On Virtue Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Magill, F.N. And McGreal, I.P. (1981). Masterpieces of World Philosophy in Summary
Form. New York: Harper & Row.
Rosenstand, N. (2008). The…[continue]
"Aristotle On Friendship In His" (2011, August 19) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-on-friendship-in-his-44057
"Aristotle On Friendship In His" 19 August 2011. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-on-friendship-in-his-44057>
"Aristotle On Friendship In His", 19 August 2011, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/aristotle-on-friendship-in-his-44057
Aristotle's View Of Friendship Aristotle views friendship as one of the most necessary and integral components to life, something sought after by all men. He goes so far as to imply that without friendship, life is not worth living at all. Friendship is described by Aristotle as one of the most important human needs, more so than power, status or prestige and is held in higher regard than these things by
Aristotle's Friendships Elena Irrera interprets Aristotle's Nichomachean Ethics on friendship as having three distinct, but possibly overlapping purposes. In addition to friendships based on love, there are also friendships based on "ethical excellence" and "utility" (p. 7). Friendships based on love can be rooted in a mutual sense of understanding and trust, and are typically rooted in a long history of companionship. Friendships based on ethical excellence are more difficult to
Aristotle & Metaphysics Aristotle calls the science he is seeking 'first philosophy or theology'. The objective of this study is to answer the question of what does first philosophy or theology consist and what is its object. In addition, this study will ask in what ways that it differs from other sciences and in what sense is it first? In the final analysis this study will answer if Aristotle's 'first philosophy
Aristotle was one of the philosophers who spent a great deal of their time in defining and explaining ethics since he believed that ethics was a science whose practicality was crucial to mankind. In this paper, we shall discuss the ideas of Aristotle pertaining to the civic relationships including the virtues, happiness, justice, deliberation and friendship. In the second part of the paper, we shall also discuss how these ideas
Aristotle thought happiness was longer in coming, it was the manner of being actualized and fulfilling one's true potential using their own individual gifts: Again, if the virtues are concerned with actions and passions, and every passion and every action is accompanied by pleasure and pain, for this reason also virtue will be concerned with pleasures and pains. This is indicated also by the fact that punishment is indicated by
Both of these are thus translated through Aristotle's health component in his enumeration of elements that could make a person happy. One's health will be affected if the toilets at work are dirty, as well as if the working conditions do not ensure the physical security of the individual. This means that when applying for a job, the individual will look first of all at these elements before deciding whether
As any successful marketing campaign, this needs to have the appropriate communication instruments and the most important of these would be the right channels: your own bosses, other employees (some who have no problem in recognizing the employee's qualities) or friends. Friends would hereby be included in the first category of Aristotle's friendships, the friendship of utility: one develops friendships with fellow colleagues in order to ensure that these friends