Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Australian Criminal Justice System: As Fair as Can Reasonably be Expected?
The current Australian criminal justice system is a legacy of the Anglo-American common law that, with minor exceptions, has been interpreted and administered in a similar fashion in all administrative divisions. This legacy has caused some observers to maintain that, "When all is said and done, the current Australian criminal justice system is about as fair and effective as we can reasonably expect." Reactions to this statement, though, will likely vary depending on what types of experiences, if any, Australians have had with the system itself. To gain additional insights in this area, this paper provides a review of the relevant literature to determine the accuracy of this statement, including a discussion of the respective strengths and/or weaknesses of the Australia legal system. A summary of the research and important findings are presented in the conclusion
Review and Discussion
To be sure, a criminal justice system can be fair without being effective, just as it can be highly effective without being fair. In order for a law enforcement system to be fair, it must be administered in an equitable fashion. For instance, according to Black's Law Dictionary, fair means "having the qualities of impartiality and honesty, free from prejudice, favoritism and self-interest; just; equitability; even-handed; equal; as between conflicting interests" (p. 595). By contrast, because scarce taxpayer resources are involved, an effective criminal justice system means that defendants are processed according to the law, respectful of their rights, but with an emphasis on administering a system that keeps staff and prisoners safe and provides ongoing oversight of community-based programs and so forth in the most efficient fashion possible.
As noted in the introduction, the answer to the question as to whether the Australian criminal justice system is fair (as opposed to effective) will depend on who is asked. In the case of Indigenous (i.e., Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islanders) people in Australia, both young and old are more likely than their non-Indigenous counterparts to become formally caught up in the criminal justice system. According to Mcallister, Dowrick and Hassan (2003), the recent statistics indicate that the Australian criminal justice system is apparently highly effective; however, it may be perceived as being anything but fair when it comes to its application to Indigenous people:
1. Aboriginal people are more than ten times more likely to appear before a magistrate's court than are other Australian-born people.
2. Aboriginal people are more likely to face a charge of offence against good order as their most serious offence; non-Aboriginal people are more likely to be defending a driving charge as their most serious offence.
3. Indigenous people are more than eighteen times more likely to be in prison.
4. Indigenous people are more than twenty-six times more likely to be in police custody than are non-Indigenous people.
5. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people constituted almost one-fifth of the Australian prison population on the prison census date (30 June 2000), but less than 2 per cent of the general population.
6. The average rate of Indigenous imprisonment is 1,727 per 100,000 adult indigenous population, which is almost fifteen times the rate for the non-Indigenous population (Mcallister et al., 2003, p. 521).
At first blush, these statistics seem to indicate that just 2 per cent of the Australian population is responsible for fully 20 per cent of crime, but the fact that 20 per cent of the Australian prison population consists of Indigenous peoples does not necessarily translate into this reality. Nevertheless, comparable disparate levels of involvement in the criminal justice system for Indigenous people also exist in New Zealand and Canada (Mccallister et al., 2003), just as African-Americans are far more likely to become formally involved in the criminal justice system in the United States than their white counterparts. From a strictly pragmatic perspective, it just makes good law enforcement sense to maximize scarce resources by targeting those who are responsible for committing most of the crimes.
Based on the foregoing statistics, it would be reasonable to suggest that these trends indicate that these minority peoples are simply running amok, causing social mayhem and crime wherever they may be found, and the criminal justice systems in these English-speaking nations are being highly effective in targeting those who are responsible for committing most of the crime -- but can such an approach truly be regarded…[continue]
"Australian Criminal Justice System As Fair As" (2012, January 19) Retrieved October 24, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-criminal-justice-system-as-fair-77551
"Australian Criminal Justice System As Fair As" 19 January 2012. Web.24 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-criminal-justice-system-as-fair-77551>
"Australian Criminal Justice System As Fair As", 19 January 2012, Accessed.24 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-criminal-justice-system-as-fair-77551
Criminal Justice System Australian Criminal Justice System "When all is said and done, the current criminal justice system is about as fair and effective as we can reasonably expect" Overview of the Criminal Justice System: Fair and Effective - Penal Populism The Democracy at Work thesis proposes that politicians have been properly responsive to public concern about crime by putting into place the more robust responses to offending which people want. An alternative perspective
Australian Criminal Justice System Formal mechanisms are required to make certain there is no bias or discrimination against the people. With informal mechanisms there was unfair treatment of the accused even to the point of receiving unjust sentencing. Those who had the power within the informal mechanisms often received the property or other goods once held by the accused, withhold evidence for personal benefit, or acted as vigilantes exacting their own
DNA in Criminal Justice System DNA in the Criminal Justice System -- DNA as Evidence Justice and Science Sources of DNA at Crime Scene Evidence Collection DNA Evidence on Trial DNA Matching This paper addresses the use of DNA in criminal justice system. The research paper will cover the usage of DNA as evidence. The importance of DNA in any criminal case as forensic evidence will be discussed through case studies. The role of DNA in court
Japanese Correctional System as Compared to the American Corrections System The Japanese correctional system places a strong emphasis on rehabilitation and preparing the prisoner for being released once again into society. The Japanese correctional system "is intended to resocialize, reform, and rehabilitate offenders" rather than enforce a system of retributive justice along the lines of the American model (Coutsoukis, 2004). This is why most sociologists state that the restorative philosophy of
This provision is based on the rationale that general damages do not represent financial loss to the injured person. A number of changes have also been made to the law in respect to assessment of damages for past and future economic loss. 4. The maximum amount of damages for economic loss due to loss of earnings or the deprivation or impairment of earning capacity is fixed at a rate of
Australian Sports Law FAIR PLAY Sports Law in Australia The dictionary defines sports as a physical activity governed by rules or customs and which is often engaged in for competition. Every civilized activity has its ground rules and so does sports. The laws and legal systems of a particular country do not infringe on the rules of a given game or sport (In Brief, 2011). The country's international governing body of the game
Instead, the commission offers as a compromise more humane treatment of refugees. ("Migration Amendment," Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, 2006, p.1) But while this may be a laudable effort, it shows that the creation of a perfect schema of justice will always be lacking, as by an accident of birth certain individuals will have access to better opportunities, housing, and a quality of life. Even legally, refugees are deemed