Australian Human Services Child Protective Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Although there has been some movement away from the legalistic mode of child protection favored in the 1980s and 1990s, there is still a focus on forensic investigation of child abuse, which does not allow for sufficient between high risk families and low risk families, decreasing the chances that truly at risk children will receive protection, as well as increasing the risk of intervention in functioning families. Currently, Australia is taking a public health approach to child protective services. "In most states child protection services are part of a broader department of human services" (Lamont & Bromfield, 2010).

The dramatic increase in services to children in danger has come with a very high price tag. "Nationally, approximately $2.8 billion was spent on child protection and out-of-home care services in 2010-11, which was an increase of $137.7 million from 2009-10. Of this expenditure, out-of-home care services accounted for the majority (64.9% or $1.8 billion). Since 2006-07, the national expenditure on child protection and out-of-home care services has shown an average annual increase of 10.2%, equating to an increase of $914.1 million. since 2006-2007" (Bromfield et al., 2012). This means that there is an average of $207 spent on every child in Australia for child protective services, though, obviously, not all children need or receive those services (Bromfield et al., 2012). "The average annual expenditure nationally has increased on average by 24.1% per year from $115.5 million in 2006-07 to $274.4 million in 2010-11" (Bromfield et al., 2012). Not only have these expenses traditionally been increasing, but one can expect them to continue to increase.

Furthermore, spending related to child abuse and at-risk children is not limited to spending on the provision of services. Instead, the territories spend a significant amount of money on prevention efforts. These efforts can occur in a wide variety of contexts, which makes calculating total expenditures a difficult proposition. "Some of the broad policy areas considered particularly relevant to child abuse prevention include: maternal and child health, parenting education and support, programs for people with a disability, domestic violence prevention, housing support, mental health and substance use programs, poverty alleviation and child care assistance" (Bromfield et al., 2012). As a result, it is impossible to determine how much the individual states and territories spend on child abuse prevention. At a national level, "estimated expenses for the whole of Program 1.1 "Family Support" was $250,368 million for 2010-11 and $249,107 million for 2011-12" (Bromfield et al., 2012).

Of course, it is critical to keep in mind that provision of services for child abuse does not end simply because a child is aging out of the system. In many ways, children who have been removed from their homes due to child abuse are far more vulnerable and less well prepared to deal with the challenges of adult life than children from non-abusive, intact homes. These children may suffer from unresolved anger issues, a history of unstable placements, failure to establish long-term goals, struggles with poverty, prior contact with the juvenile justice system, and a failure to have an established support network (Bromfield et al., 2012). At this time, there is not a sufficient after-care program, which means that many of these former at-risk children will, themselves, either reproduce and create children who are at greater risk of being abused or create other strains on the social system through criminal involvement or chronic poverty.

References

Bromfield, L. & Holzer, P. (2008). A national approach for child protection: Project report.

Retrieved March 26, 2013 from New South Wales Government website: http://www.community.nsw.gov.au/docswr/_assets/main/documents/childprotection_report.pdf

Bromfield, L., Holzer, P., Lamont, A., Kovaks, K., Richardson, N., & Scott, D. (2013). How

much does Australia spend on child protection? Retrieved March 27, 2013 from Australian Institute of Family Studies website: http://www.aifs.gov.au/cfca/pubs/factsheets/a142118/index.html

Lamont, A. & Bromfield, L. (2010). History of child protective services. Retrieved March 26,

2013 from Australian Institute of Family Studies website:

http://www.aifs.gov.au/nch/pubs/sheets/rs22/rs22.pdf

Liddell, M., Donegan, T., Goddard, C., & Tucci, J. (2007). The state of child protection:

Australian child welfare and child protection developments 2005. Retrieved March 27, 2013 from Australian Childhood Foundation website: http://www.childhood.org.au/Assets/Files/6f88319e-90c7-4b8d-b208-cbea46913648.pdf

Osborn, A., & Bromfield, L. (2007). Young people leaving care. Retrieved March 26, 2013

from Australian Institute of Family Studies website: http://www.aifs.gov.au/nch/pubs/brief/rb7/rb7.html[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Australian Human Services Child Protective" (2013, March 27) Retrieved December 1, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-human-services-child-protective-87016

"Australian Human Services Child Protective" 27 March 2013. Web.1 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-human-services-child-protective-87016>

"Australian Human Services Child Protective", 27 March 2013, Accessed.1 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/australian-human-services-child-protective-87016

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Human Services Chaim Zins Does

    The hope appears to be that deinstitutionalization will lead to human services that are more inclusive and that do not marginalize disadvantaged and minority groups in the same way that centralized institutionalized care did. However, this leads me with the question of who is establishing the standards of care for the smaller groups? Are those standards established locally? If not, then how can the standards possibly reflect the concerns

  • Diversity and or How Child Abuse in Handled in New York Compared...

    Diversity and Child Abuse Prevention Diversity and How Child Abuse in Handled in New York Compared to Other Countries There is developing debate regarding the suitable combination of programs and polices needed to react to concerns of child abuse and neglect. Child neglect and abuse hold significant effects for prospective health and mental health of a child. As a result, it is imperative to comprehend connections among different forms of maltreatment, family

  • Preventing Child Abuse Is a Top Priority

    Preventing child abuse is a top priority for social service agencies, families, teachers, and others in the community. Certainly it is a top priority for government agencies and law enforcement as well. This paper reviews and critiques the importance of taking those actions that prevent a child from being maltreated in any number of ways; the paper also reviews the statistics relating to child abuse, and provides information on how

  • Long Term Effects of Divorce on Children

    Long-Term Effects of Divorce on Children Research reveals divorce negatively impacts the divorcing individuals. The effects of divorce the children of divorcing parents experience, however, has not been heavily researched. Consequently, the focus for this qualitative case study examines six studies, to investigate the long-term effects of divorce on children. "A stable family situation after divorce does not erase the negative effects of a divorce, but children in this situation fare much

  • Parental Drug Addiction & Impact on Children

    PARENTAL DRUG ADDICTION & IMPACT ON CHILDREN Impact of parental drug use Neurobiological causes of drug addiction Social support to victims of parental drug addiction Child needs during treatment of parental drug addiction Impact of parental drug use Barnard and McKeganey (2004) investigated the impact that parental drug use created on their children and ways and means that can be helpful in mitigating these effects. The study was aimed at reviewing the literature on this subject.

  • Social Work a Practice Framework

    This drives a value system that makes our work preventative by one intent. With a clear understanding that some intervention will require a removal of the child from his or her parents' care, the value of family togetherness will direct the strategy of community involvement on the part of the agency. Specialised knowledge: The practice framework is guided by specialized knowledge on the patterns and trends dominating the landscape of abuse

  • Parenting Program for Women and

    There are many of these individuals, and it is time that this is changed. Parents often look away from these kinds of problems, or they spend their time in denial of the issue because they feel that their child will not be harmed by parental involvement with drugs or alcohol. Some parents have parents that were/are addicts themselves, and some are so busy with their lives that they do not


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved