Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Lincoln-Douglas Debates and Politics in the Mid-19th Century
To the Editor of the Freeport Press:
I am writing today to express my strong support for Abraham Lincoln's candidacy in the upcoming Senatorial elections. There are many reasons why I have decided to vote for a Republican -- going against my life-long commitment to the Democratic Party -- not the least of which is the way in which Lincoln stood up to the demagoguery of Mr. Douglas. While Lincoln showed great skill at oratory, Douglas' dirty tactics and his obsession with the idea that Negroes are less than human have contributed to my decision in this election.
In fact, when Douglass loudly asserted that Republicans who supported an end to slavery were something akin to demons, I was outraged. When Douglas said he would "…nail it [Republican platforms] upon the back of every Black Republican in the state," he alienated me, my friends, and many thoughtful, intelligent Illinois citizens. The arrogance and use of slander and intimidation by Douglas was shamefully rude and inflammatory.
Meanwhile, please indulge me while I explain more fully why I am voting for a Republican in this election. It should be noted that the Republican party has only been in existence for a few years, but the platform opposes slavery and opposes the Fugitive Slave Law, and hence, I am going to vote for Lincoln and support his (what some would call) 'radical' candidacy.
My support for Lincoln is not based entirely upon his performance at Freeport -- not at all. In fact Lincoln's handling of the questions, and his intelligent approach to controversy -- showing that he was a thoughtful, sensitive man, who deeply cares about the future of Illinois and of the United States -- was just the tipping point for me. I had been leaning towards voting for a candidate who would speak out against slavery, or who would at least support the gradual elimination of slavery in every state in this country.
Also, I have been an opponent of the Fugitive Slave Law since it was initially discussed in Congress, and since it has been made law I have grown increasingly negative towards this unfair legislation. Why would a slave owner in Georgia have the right to come into Illinois, or into Wisconsin, just north of Freeport, or to send a bounty hunter into our state, to capture a negro who had managed to escape the tyranny and oppression that slave owner had visited upon him?
Why would northern states tolerate a law that allows slave owners to essentially take the law into their own hands by kidnapping a negro who had managed to escape and had managed to come to a place where he or she was welcomed, given a job, and allowed to start a new life? I have read news accounts of how United States Marshalls have aided slave owners by helping to kidnap negroes who made it to Illinois or Wisconsin.
I am certainly not alone in my revulsion for the Fugitive Slave law, which has caused violence and unrest throughout the Midwest and beyond. For example, a hundred miles north of us in Milwaukee, Wisconsin, a bounty hunter entered a restaurant and dragged a negro by his head and neck out into the street. Supposedly the negro was a runaway slave. After dragging the negro out into the street, the bounty hunter, a burly, beastly strong man, chained his prisoner and began to drag him away.
But word quickly spread in the city that a bounty hunter had come to seize a man washing dishes in a restaurant -- a man who happened to be a negro -- and a large group of white citizens quickly gathered on the street and beat the bounty hunter so severely he passed away a few days later from the vicious attack. The chains were removed from the negro and he returned to the kitchen, where he was gainfully employed. Shortly thereafter, the Wisconsin legislature passed a law banning bounty hunters from coming into the state, with stiff penalties for those individuals who tried to ply their trade.
In our neighboring state of Indiana, bounty agents arrested a negro who had run away about twenty years earlier, and had, meantime, made a new life for himself. As his wife and children…[continue]
"Beginning Of The End Of Slavery" (2014, July 08) Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/beginning-of-the-end-slavery-190368
"Beginning Of The End Of Slavery" 08 July 2014. Web.28 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/beginning-of-the-end-slavery-190368>
"Beginning Of The End Of Slavery", 08 July 2014, Accessed.28 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/beginning-of-the-end-slavery-190368
Slavery in the Caribbean: Effects on Culture, Race and Labour Origins of slavery The Caribbean slavery began in the 16th and 17th century during the emergence of piracy. The basis for the modern Caribbean dates back to the slave trade and slavery. During the 16th century, outsiders settled in the Caribbean. This was a period characterised the European powers struggling for trade supremacy and the utilization of newly found resources. During the
Slavery The remnant of slavery in America has caused a great deal of stigma and represents a lasting stain on our nation's history. The issue slavery is a difficult one to explore because of the sensitivities involved and the shame associated with the practice of slavery. There are many issues that can be discussed when delving into this particular topic. Although the institution of slavery was prevalent in many states a
slavery in the eighteenth century as illustrated in the autobiography "The interesting narrative of the life of Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa the African." Olaudah Equiano Olaudah Equiano was an eminent writer from the colonial period. Equiano was actually born in Nigeria, who became the first black slave in America to write an autobiography. The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano or Gustavus Vassa the African was first published
Slavery in America The Beginning of Slavery The first year that African slaves were brought to Colonial America was reported to be 1619 (Vox, 2012). The ship that docked at Point Comfort, in Jamestown Virginia, was owned by the Dutch. The Dutch crew was said to be starving and they wanted to make a trade with the colonists -- slaves for food, Vox explains in The New York Times-owned publications About.com. There
Slavery and Caste Systems When Repressive Policies Linger Slavery in the United States, apartheid in South Africa, and the Indian caste system are now all illegal. However, this does not mean that the consequences of these systems of violence against people have vanished. This paper examines the ways in which these three systems continue to affect the lives of people today, even (as in the case of American slavery) the system itself
Virginia's code lagged far behind South Carolina's of 1696 and the earlier British island codes" (Vaughn 306). These early slave codes also served to further differentiate the appropriate legal rights that were afforded white indentured servants compared to their enslaved African counterparts. In this regard, Leon Higgenbotham adds that "at the same time the codes were emphatic in denying slaves any of the privileges or rights that had accrued to
Slavery pattern in North America took a funny trend since initially the blacks had some social positions and had a voice in the running of the community. This however later changed and the North also started to own slaves at a higher rate. There are several factors that led to this change in events in the north that made it to fancy slavery just as much as the South was