Bribing Unethical And Illegal Or Just A Essay

¶ … bribing" unethical and illegal or just a cost of doing business? Bribery is unethical and illegal in some societies and a regular part of business in others. Whether or not an activity is unethical is largely dependent on the culture, customs, norms, values, and laws of the country where the activity takes place. It's a matter of perspective. When you consider that the act of bribery is intended to supplement the income of underpaid officials or increase the power of a nation's governments, the outcome of the bribe is a negative one. Most economists and ethicists agree that bribery's effects are largely detrimental (Weber and Getz, 2004). If the effect of the act is detrimental, then it can be argued that it is unethical to engage in bribery even if it is only a cost of doing business.

There are different types of corruption: bureaucratic corruption where officials take bribes; political corruption where politicians take bribes using their positions of power; and grand corruption meaning misuse of public power by heads of states, ministers and top officials for private, pecuniary profit (Gerasimova, 2008). Bribery has opportunity costs because the money paid as bribes is not put to productive use and may lead officials to contract with inefficient firms for inappropriate goods or services (Weber and Getz, 2004). Bribery creates disincentives to foreign investment by increasing risk and uncertainty for firms, such that economic development is hindered (Weber and Getz, 2004).

The negative consequences of bribery on the local population should be considered by every company that engages in operations in that country. If the act of bribery causes the government to engage in unproductive projects that deteriment its citizens then it is unethical for companies to engage in bribery.

II. What other options do companies have to win business contracts without bribing?

Corruption is a symptom of other, deeper-seated factors, such as poorly designed economic policies, low levels of education, underdeveloped civil society, and the weak accountability of public institutions (Gerasimova, 2008). This makes it difficult for...

...

Depending on the level of corruption it may not be possible to win a contract without bribery. It is difficult to compete against other companies that are willing to pay the bribes to get the contracts despite the negative effects on the people of the country.
One way that businesses could win contracts may to offer to invest money in developing countries to increase economic development, build infrastructure and create jobs. This can only work, however if there are government officials of the country are willing to forgo bribes for the good of the country. Some countries have rampant bribery at all levels of government and other countries have more low level officials that accept bribes, but may have a level of government that a company can work with to avoid the bribes.

Another method of winning contracts without bribes would be for company's competing for contracts to all agree not to offer bribes. This is a difficult proposition because not all companies share the same values and the desire for profits may outweigh the desire to stop bribery. International organizations have suggested a two-sided approach to stopping bribery - to change attitudes toward multinational bribery in industrial countries and to increase awareness in developing countries of the costs of corruption (Gerasimova, 2008). Breaking the culture of bribery is the only real way for companies to compete fairly, because then all the companies competing would be on a level playing field.

Part B

I. What advantages does an understanding of local culture give managers in working in business competition?

Many businesses have failed due to a lack of understanding of local culture, especially concerning taboos. In the Middle East there are strict religious rule on how men and women interact, which must be taken into consideration when operating a business (Daniels, Radenbaugh and Sullivan, 2010). Managers who understand cultural differences will be more successful and less likely to make critical errors that can drive customers away.

Understanding cultural differences…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

ABC News Productions (2002, November 20). Inside the Kingdom: Saudia Arabia. [Television broadcast]. New York: Nightline.

Gerasimova Ksenia. (2008). Can corruption and economic crime be controlled in developing countries and if so, is it cost-effective? Journal of Financial Crime, 15(2), 223-233. Retrieved January 13, 2011, from ABI/INFORM Global. (Document ID: 1472787421).

Daniels, John, Radebaugh, Lee, Sulliven, Daniel (2010) International Business: Environments and Operations (13th Edition). Place of Publication needs to be inserted here: Prentice Hall.

Weber, J., & Getz, K. (2004). BUY BRIBES OR BYE-BYE BRIBES: THE FUTURE STATUS OF BRIBERY IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCE. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(4), 695-711. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
Retrieved January 13, 2011, from http://www.shrm.org/TemplatesTools/Samples/SupervisoryNewsletter/fall05/Pages/story6.aspx


Cite this Document:

"Bribing Unethical And Illegal Or Just A" (2011, January 14) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bribing-unethical-and-illegal-or-just-a-85135

"Bribing Unethical And Illegal Or Just A" 14 January 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bribing-unethical-and-illegal-or-just-a-85135>

"Bribing Unethical And Illegal Or Just A", 14 January 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/bribing-unethical-and-illegal-or-just-a-85135

Related Documents

Scott Fitzgerald, The Great Gatsby F. Scott Fitzgerald's book, The Great Gatsby, is iconic for a period and a place where the world was caught by the mad drive to recover from the trauma of a world war. The meeting with the specter of death on a mass scale in a time when everybody thought wars were a thing of the past had left the young generation desperate to experience everything

business scandals in the early 2000s brought the issue of business ethics to the fore -- Enron, WorldCom and Tyco. The three share some similarities but they are different in other ways. Enron was simply a case of criminal activity. The company's management did not publish financial statements and when they did the statements completely misrepresented the company's financial position. This occurred on the direction of the senior management

Siemens AG Scandal Siemens AG had over one hundred fifty years of experience making business deals internationally by the time it became embroiled in several bribery scandals in 2006. Beginning in the mid-1800s, the company set up products such as telegraph networks and maintenance and initiated business practices such as fixed-hour workdays and employee career training that helped it get ahead. With a long and solid history as a leading company

Managers may engage in fraudulent activities by selling company information or details of customers. The manager improperly accesses the company's it system to alter values for citation issued. Fraud is an illegal activity, and the manager that is choosing the bribing vendor over the other vendors is just very wrong. "Most commonly used types of bribes are cash, travel and entertainment rewards," as noted by Dillon (2008, p. 37). Once

Bribery What is the difference between lobbying and bribery? The major difference between lobbying and bribery is that the latter is considered a criminal activity which can lead to massive fines or even jail time depending on the nature and degree of the offense. Lobbying on the other hand is considered legal. Interest groups wish to gain the attention and support of politicians or influential groups, such as the International Olympics Committee

According to Goodman (2001) American companies recognize that a serious dilemma exist. On the one hand, the laws that govern international business for American companies have declared it illegal to provide bribes and kickbacks. Not only are the companies breaking the law but they are using deceitful tactics to break the law so that they will not get caught. On the other hand, "They are answerable to shareholders on Wall