Communicating at Work Different Personality Research Paper

  • Length: 8 pages
  • Sources: 4
  • Subject: Careers
  • Type: Research Paper
  • Paper: #51375982

Excerpt from Research Paper :

However, as has been stated, teams are not put together solely on the basis of interpersonal compatibility but for the optimal configuration of skill sets. It happens that individuals do not get along; a manager can help alleviate tensions with good communications skills. In the case of self-managed teams, however, the role of peacemaker or taskmaster is much less clearly defined. Individuals may or may not take it upon themselves to deal with a problem employee. Some individuals may choose to ignore the problem to the best of their ability, in some cases doing more work or working outside their scope of expertise in order to compensate. Other individuals may become confrontational, causing tension on the team and making its work efforts less effective. Langfred (2007) noted that teams may "unintentionally restructure themselves inefficiently in response to conflict." His longitudinal study examined the effects of task conflict, where self-managed team members had differing views and opinions on goal-setting, goal attainment and different work process issues. The study provides further support for the work of Li and Butler (2004), who showed that goals were better realized when defined and assigned from outside the team. The popularity of self-managed teams can make that a less viable option, leaving teams to try to work it out on their own.

Langfred (2007) reported that team members who do not trust one another are unwilling to give each other more freedom and discretion over individual work. Team efforts may ultimately be compromised as members seek balance. They may settle for an inferior end result because the process whereby they achieved it was less difficult. Decisions made in response to conflict avoidance may often be less than ideal, yet studies of group dynamics show this can often be the case. Langfred's work points to the need for further work on the concept of self-managing teams and what organizations can do to facilitate success. The benefits of such teams are apparent, but it is also apparent that the same benefits can be negatives.

A possible solution is training by the organization in team communication skills, so that employees are prepared to lead teams or become part of self-managed teams. Providing employees with information, engaging them in team building activities prior to team work, and facilitating role playing activities may all contribute to better team practices. Employees can hopefully increase self-awareness and self-esteem, both of which would enable them to better understand and interact with others. Organizations can engage employees in these activities prior to assignment of team projects so that they have time to develop the skills needed for collaborative work before the additional stresses of project tasks and deadlines are added.

One encounters various personality types in the workplace. Interpersonal communications can present challenges, particularly when dealing with individuals whose interpersonal skills are lacking. An understanding of personality types and team dynamics can help employees at all levels work more successfully toward achievement of the organization's goals.

References

Arnold, J. (2005). The congruence problem in John Holland's theory of vocational decisions.

Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 77, 95-113.

Chapman, a. (2009). Donald Kirkpatrick's learning evaluation theory -- a training and learning measurement, evaluation and assessments model. Businessballs.com. Retrieved from http://www.businessballs.com/kirkpatricklearningevaluationmodel.htm

Cook, R.A., Goff, J.L. (2002). Coming of age with self-managed teams: Dealing with a problem employee. Journal of Business and Psychology, 16(3) 485. Retrieved from the proQuest database.

DuFrene, D.D., Sharbrough, W., Clipson, T., & McCall, M. (1999). Bringing outdoor challenge education inside the business education classroom. Business Communication Quarterly

62 (3), 24-36.

Hlemstra, K.M. (1999). Shake my hand: Making the right first impression in business with nonverbal communications. Business Communication Quarterly 62 (4), 71-74.

Langfred, C.W. (2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams.

Academy of Management Journal 50 (4), 885-900.

Li, a., Butler, a.B. (2004). The effects of participation in goal setting and goal rationales on goal commitment: An exploration of justice mediators. Journal of Business and Psychology, 19(1) 37. Retrieved from the proQuest database.

Moynihan, L.M., Roehling, M.V., LePine, M.A., Boswell, W.R. (2003). A longitudinal study of the relationships among job search self-efficacy, job interviews, and employment outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18(2) 207. Retrieved from the proQuest database.

Toomey, K.D., Levinson, E.M., & Palmer, E.J. (2009). A test of Holland's theory of vocational personalities and work environments. Journal of Employment Counseling 46 (2), pp. 82-

93.

Yi, L., & Burchell, B. (2008). Distributed work: Communication in an "officeless firm." New…

Cite This Research Paper:

"Communicating At Work Different Personality" (2011, March 14) Retrieved April 24, 2017, from
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/communicating-at-work-different-personality-3722

"Communicating At Work Different Personality" 14 March 2011. Web.24 April. 2017. <
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/communicating-at-work-different-personality-3722>

"Communicating At Work Different Personality", 14 March 2011, Accessed.24 April. 2017,
http://www.paperdue.com/essay/communicating-at-work-different-personality-3722