Concept of Life and Death and Freud and Nietzsche Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Life and Death and Freud and Nietzsche

What are the similarities between Plato's concept of life after death and the early Christian concept of life after death? How did later Christians combine these concepts? What is the evidence that Jesus came back to life after execution?

Plato is often considered as one of the greatest philosophers who ever lived. He wrote about the concepts of justice and social order, of moral right and wrong, and about the dichotomy of life and death. Throughout a person's life they are inexorably moving ever closer to their own demise. It is inevitable and yet people are terrified of this event even though it is as natural a part of living as is breathing or the beating of your heart. In one piece, Plato expresses his beliefs on the immortality of the soul (Peterson 214). He explains this in different ways, first of which is the "cyclical argument" which is that since the human body is mortal and can perish, then the soul must be a formal opposite. Just like matter cannot be either created or destroyed, only changed, so too the human soul cannot either begin or end; it simply changes forms. The second argument is the "theory of recollection" which states that at the moment of birth, people already have some knowledge, such as how to breath and how to cry and how to relate to mother and father. The only logical reason for this prenatal knowledge is if the soul is older than the physical body and has already been through a life before. Thirdly, he argues that there are two types of things which exist: the tangible and seeable components of the world and the more ethereal, invisible aspects. Just because they are not visible, does not mean that these things do not exist. The final argument in favor of the presence of the soul is that it participates in the life process. Since to exist, something must be temporary and something infinite, it is only logical that the soul not only exists, but it also eternal. The soul cannot die. Therefore, man cannot really die. His body may perish, but the soul continues on into the next plane of existence. If the soul is immortal, then this part of man is also immortal. Philosophers, being perhaps more insightful than other members of the society, will understand this immortality and will celebrate the death of their body as the potential for rebirthing of the soul.

Christians-based much of their belief system on both Judaism and on the religious and philosophical teachings of the Roman which whom they co-existed. The concepts of the afterlife regarding heaven and hell as they are understood today came a bit later. According to Christians, there was an immoral soul, as described by Plato. However, they asserted that human beings could only ascend to Heaven after the death of Jesus Christ. His death and resurrection was making up for all of the sins perpetrated by mankind and by sacrificing himself all humans were forgiven. Those who accepted Jesus as their savior and accepted the teachings of the Christian religion could hope to achieve Heaven after their death while those who refused to accept the new religion would be doomed to go to Hell where their souls would be punished for eternity. Whereas Plato and the Greeks postulated the soul as something powerful and therefore better than the human body, the Christians used this concept really as an intimidation tactic. Not wanting to burn because of being wicked, naive members of the society would dedicate themselves to Christianity out of fear rather than because of a true belief in the divine nature of Jesus Christ. Further, in order to prove that their religion was the only true one, Christians elevated Jesus's importance to make him the direct son of God. To this end, people were enlisted who would provide eye witness evidence as to his divinity. They claimed to have seen Jesus Christ in the cave days after his death (Peterson 212). There is of course no empirical evidence to prove that Jesus resurrected after his crucifixion. The only evidence which has ever been made available are the testimonials of witnesses, many of which were recorded only decades if not centuries after they were to have occurred.

2) How is the belief in the Judean-Christian-Muslim God possible after the penetrating genealogical critiques of Nietzsche…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Concept Of Life And Death And Freud And Nietzsche" (2013, May 04) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/concept-of-life-and-death-freud-100220

"Concept Of Life And Death And Freud And Nietzsche" 04 May 2013. Web.6 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/concept-of-life-and-death-freud-100220>

"Concept Of Life And Death And Freud And Nietzsche", 04 May 2013, Accessed.6 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/concept-of-life-and-death-freud-100220

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Meaning of Life

    Life It is important to acquire goodness in order to understand the meaning and purpose of life. Distressed and hopeless people do not consider or think about the meaning of life. For them, the meaning of life becomes inappropriate when their existence is at stake and when their life is a mixture of worries and perplexities. On the other hand, people who are not desperate mull over the meaning of life.

  • Nietzsche Freud Morrison

    Life: Purpose The meaning for life has illusively evaded humans for centuries. Theories abound, yet the hunger remains as mankind seeks to identify a purpose for their existence. The question of our purpose is often unknowingly based on two other unanswered queries. While some seems to construct on a meaning of life from their accomplishments, basing personal value, purpose, meaning on what he or she builds to leave behind after

  • Martin Heidegger Alber Camus and Sigmund Freud

    Heidiegger Camus Martin Heidegger's "Being and Time" addresses both of these complex philosophical concepts, being and time. Being means existence, or the fact that something can exist. Heidegger approaches the concept of being from multiple perspectives. Being is the quality of existence, or the fact that something exists. Does this mean the opposite of Being is Nothingness? What does Heidegger say about anti-matter? Heidegger also probes the force that causes a

  • Violence For God or Liberty

    America took the notion of liberty and placed it in an economical framework, composed by Adam Smith in Wealth of Nations. Smith anticipated Marx by nearly a century when he focused on the nature of man and society in what amounted to a purely economical outlook. He views the violence that men do to one another and to themselves as stemming from an economical cause. The savage nations (hunters and

  • Secular Humanism the Rise and

    This work provided an intensive discussion historical forces that were to lead to modern humanism but also succeeds in placing these aspects into the context of the larger social, historical and political milieu. . Online sources and databases proved to be a valid and often insightful recourse area for this topic. Of particular note is a concise and well-written article by Stephen Weldon entitled Secular Humanism in the United States.

  • Ted Hughes Poetry

    Crow & Hawk: the Bird Spirit Poetry of Ted Hughes Poets and prophets from Aesop to Isaiah to Blake have traditionally used animal figures to convey a criticism of existing culture, endowing the natural with metaphoric import. In most preliterate cultures, animals were equally endowed with metaphoric importance more immediately interpreted into mythologies and shamanistic rituals that enabled people to address and interact with their world. In the modern British and

  • Alfred Adler Was One of the First

    Alfred Adler was one of the first supporters of Sigmund Freud's theories of psychoanalysis in Vienna in the eraly-20th Century, although the two psychiatrists had a particularly harsh falling out in 1911 and never reconciled. Adler's basic theories were so distinctive from Freud's that any attempt to combine them would have been impossible, given that he denied the existence of the id, ego and superego. In general, Adler minimized the


Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved