283). Essentially, interests-based strategies are used in outcomes in which one desires either fairness of organization effectiveness, for the simple fact that this stratagem frequently requires the use of third-party intervention. In most instances, that third party will merely assist in facilitating the resolving of such a conflict by speaking to each disputant and helping them to solve the conflict for themselves. The third-party's role is strictly supplementary, unless

In keeping with the collaboration of HR and leaders across the organization, more communicative, open structures to conflict resolution perform more effectively than autocratic ones (Carmeli, Atwater, Levi, 2011). The ability to emerge from conflict with greater trust is a major difference between transactional, autocratic or transformational leaders managing conflict resolution strategies. The idea is to use conflict as a galvanizing force in getting the organization to its goals. Autocratic

Conflict management and conflict resolution are integral parts of any given organization. The antecedents for conflict vary in nature, yet three desired outcomes can be defined. There are many reasons as to why conflict can arise within an organization, however the types of conflict that arise can be differentiated between functional and dysfunctional conflicts. Functional conflicts are considered to be "constructive, support your company's goals, and improve performance" and often involve

The assistant nurse on the other side argued that she had strict orders from doctor, not to accept any extra tokens as doctor had to leave on time for another hospital. Conflict Resolution Supervisor nurse brought this issue to my room and being a nurse manager/leader, it was my duty to solve the conflict. The most important thing for me at that time was the patient care and to solve the

These conflicts do not affect only the people involved, but may affect an entire nation, especially in the case of the latter type of conflict. There are, indeed, many types of conflict, just as there are many potential solutions to conflict. With any kind of solution comes a good understanding of the roots of the conflict, but also of the personalities involved and how mutual respect and understanding, as well

But the remote success of collective security agreements has suggested that a middle ground may be found. For instance, Hamilton recalls two examples of democracies rising from authoritarian governments that are often used to justify the United States' current occupation of Iraq -- Japan and Germany. Hamilton argues that the "accomplishments of Japan and Germany depended in part upon the framework of 'collective security' that guided American foreign policy