Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Learning
Constructivist and cognitive theories are both aimed towards creating a productive classroom environment in which knowledge is imparted in a manner to maximize retention and assure application. This paper aims to understand the underlying patterns of both teaching approaches and comparing and contrasting their basic assumptions, in order to test their resultant feasibility.
Learning theories revolve around the best possible methods known to educators worldwide, which can assist them in creating a productive classroom environment. As the standard of education has evolved, so has the set of strategies associated with imparting knowledge in the most industrious manner. Advance teaching techniques have seeped into the stream of traditional classes and many studious professionals have put their shoulder to the door in order to discover feasible educational theories to help all students. This paper is about the comparison between two such leading educational theories: constructivism and cognitivism. It aims to identify both the differences as well as the similarities between the notions and propose them in a viable and realistic way.
In order to understand which stratagem is the best in terms of creating a fruitful class environment and taking teaching up a notch, we must first unravel the basic definitions of the said theories. The constructivist approach was stimulated by Bartlett in 1932, and it is an approach which postulates that learners learn according to their personal experiences and belief systems. What someone ultimately retains is grounded within their mental perceptions. In other words in this approach learning does not precede execution but instead it succeeds...
So, the best way to teach a student is to let them experience the intended concepts firsthand, for that would guarantee maximum retention as well as application. The basic assumptions related to constructive learning are that knowledge is procedurally constructed with the help of experience, which naturally entails that learning is a personal process for every individual and as such every individual should have the space to interpret their share of occurrences. Learning constructively happens to be an active process which remains dynamic. The dynamism is due to the fact that with each passing experience, a learner's concepts tend to grow. (Mergel, 1998)
It is largely agreed that there are four key aspects of constructivist learning. Firstly, learners construct their own interpretations so the educational process is active as opposed to passive. Secondly, new concepts are assembled upon the foundation of prior know how, this entails that learners must be able to compare and contrast newer concepts with older ones according to their personal retention capacities. Thirdly learning is augmented via social interaction; this postulate means that access to frequent social settings gives rise to a wide variety of experiences which in turn boosts effective learning. And lastly, constructivism assumes that significant learning only occurs through proper simulation oriented activities. (Cooperstein & Kocewar-Weidinger, 2004)
The application of the afore-mentioned assumptions is based on authentic activities that reinforce the content to be educated. Different situations must be given to students to find their way through and to comprehend according to the best of their abilities. Gradual…
Works Cited
Cooperstein, S.E., & Kocewar-Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond Active Learning: A Constructvist Approach to Learning. References Services Review, 32. Retrieved February 2013
Greeno, J.G., Collins, A.M., & Resnick, L.B. (n.d.). Cognition and Learning. Retrieved February 2013
Mergel, B. (1998). Instructional Design and Learning Theory. University of Saskatchewan, Educational Communications and Technology. Retrieved Februaruy 2013
Constructivist Computerized Learning Constructivist theories of knowledge development and learning have been around since the turn of the 20th century. But it may well be the advent of computerized and e-learning educational opportunities that offer this perspective its real chance to make a difference in the virtual world of learning and instruction. From Piaget to Papert, the core precepts of the constructivist understanding have been affirmed by what technology has to
To ensure that the constructivist approach functions optimally, teachers must therefore ensure that the interactional and social situation within each group is managed effectively as well. Young (2003) notes that another challenge facing teachers and students is the implementation of technology in the constructivist classroom. The specific challenge here is that, more often than not, computer technology has been subject to the traditionally constructed classroom, where knowledge about and by
Bruner's constructivist theory and the conceptual paradigms of Kolb's Experiential Learning theory drawing on the associated theories are Kinesthetic and Embodied Learning. As also noted in the introductory chapter, the guiding research question for this study was, "What are the career paths for teaching artists seeking to deploy into the field of community art and development?" To develop timely and informed answers to this research question, this chapter provides
Learning Through Play How Do Children Learn Through Play? How Does Teacher Intervention Support Or Limit Learning Through Play
Learning Theories to Current Education In psychology and education, learning is normally described as a process that brings together cognitive, emotional, and influences of the environment being experienced for obtaining, enhancing, or enacting changes in an individual knowledge, values, skills, and views of the world. Learning as a process put their center of attention on what takes place during learning. Explanations of what takes place forms learning theories. A learning theory
The reinforcement is positive if it results in strengthening the response, or negative when its removal strengthens the response. The reinforcer must immediately and directly follow the response and be appropriate. Varying the schedule of reinforcement makes it more effective; either changing the time interval between reinforcements or the number of correct responses needed for reinforcement to be offered. Punishment on the other hand is an undesirable or painful