Strauss emphasized his interpretation by saying, "Corporal punishment... was associated with an increased probability of a child assaulting the parent a year and a half later. Thus, while it is true that corporal punishment teaches the child a lesson, it is certainly not the lesson intended by the parents." (Strauss, 2001). The assumption that corporal punishment "taught" the children to assault their parents may not have been valid either. Perhaps these children were already prone to such behavior, and the parents used corporal punishment in an failed attempt to turn the child's behavior around. Another study cited by Strauss correlated corporal punishment with dating violence later, while fourth study used children of mothers seen hitting their children during interviews (Strauss, 2001). Once again the important issues were blurred. Hitting and spanking are not the same thing.
One of the criticisms of corporal punishment is that it "is not used merely as a last resort, but is inflicted regularly and for the smallest of infractions." (Benatar, 1998) Such statements demonstrate once again the lack of focus when talking about corporal punishment. Few people would agree with using corporal punishment for "the smallest of infractions." It would be helpful if researchers would define the issue narrowly so more confidence could be given regarding findings.
It does not make sense for parents to use corporal punishment on teenagers, who are independent enough and big enough to apply corporal punishment back at the parent. While it is known that corporal punishment of teens causes resentment and bitterness,(Author not given, 1966), any teen can tell researchers about the kind of resentment that non-corporal punishment can trigger as well. Teens frequently resent any type of consequences applied to their behavior. In order to talk about corporal punishment sensibly, researchers and others need to talk more precisely. They need to specify the age group for whom they oppose or support corporal punishment. Many parents who would give a toddler a swat on the behind with an open hand for running into the street would not dream of attempting to spank...
Not all children will respond to positive reinforcement, but sometimes even drastic negative reinforcement such as corporal punishment does not work on these children. In general, however, positive reinforcement is only one way to teach children discipline very quickly and make sure that the lesson remains with them in the future. In the past, it was thought that corporal punishment was the way to do this, and some schools
" Moreover, since America has outlawed beating military personnel, military detainees, wives, prisoners, and the aged, it makes sense that we should extend such protection to children. In fact, it more than makes sense; it seems to be the only viable option for a first world society such as ours that values freedom, equality, and justice for all. Works Cited American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Psycho-social Aspects of Child and Family
Against Spanking as a Way of Disciplining Children Spanking is a subject that has sparked controversy for a long time. The debate has been raging in academic circles, among caregivers and psychologists alike. The idea of spanking is blended with cultural views, religious beliefs, laws imposed by government and a myriad of other factors. The practice of spanking has immense effects that are both psychological and physical. The issue of
Corporal Punishment, Time-Out, And Other Forms of Child Discipline This paper is presented in the format of an outline. It discusses the issue of child discipline including corporal punishment, time-out, and other methods. The issue of child discipline has been a topic of hot debate for many years. The 1960's brought about a revolutionary change in the way children were disciplined. Today there are many methods to chose from and it is an
Spanking Perhaps no topic generates as much heated debate among parents and child development experts as corporal punishment. While defenders argue for the continued necessity of the practice, new research shows more clearly the benefits of sparing the rod and avoiding corporal punishment altogether. These studies cite numerous reasons against corporal punishment, from increasing aggression in children to the practice's moral repugnance. This paper, however, focuses on studies that show corporal punishment
In other words, when the total number of people characterized by each variable (or stratum) oscillates within the population, to the researcher would choose the size of each sample for each stratum according to the research requirements. Such a choice is prejudiced by the probability of obtaining an adequate number of sampling units from each stratum within the final sample. As a rule, disproportionate stratified samples are used either
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now