This when the Army must spread out its resources to engage threat WMDs and WMD networks. The concept applies to counterforce operations, sensors, protection, and training.
Leveraging new technologies. Many of the required capabilities presented in the strategy will be possible only through applications of new technology. The Army must leverage these new technologies.
Enhance training. Unit training is currently more flexible and quickly adaptive in comparison with institutional training. but, it often lacks valuable consistency and standardization.
Institutional training content updates, approval, and resourcing it is tied to processes too slow to remain current. Future training will prepare soldiers and leaders to exercise sound judgment in the analysis of data / information, understanding cultural impacts on operations and to act in periods of uncertainty.
These ideas are providing a background for implementing new technology and key strategies for improving the countermeasures and neutralization of WMDs. However, this research is not talking about what specific solutions should be utilized or how any kind of effective strategy needs to be coordinated. This exposes many of the ideas to general factors which are not taking into account specific variables that could impact the strategy. As a result, there needs to be greater amounts of flexibility provided during this process.
The design of the study will be focused on using is the quantitative approach. This is when actuaries will look at wide variety of current and older sources. During this process, there is a focus on identifying key solutions that have been utilized, possible tools and ideas for adjusting with various changes.
The theoretical framework is to concentrate on specific solutions that are effective in helping to mitigate the possibility of WMD attack occurring. This means looking at various ideas and applying common sense principles. The data collection method will be to carefully examine a wide variety of scholarly, governmental, military, news related and statistical resources to see the trends that are developing.
As a result, the research will be conducted by looking at numerous sources and then contrasting the findings with each other. This will be accomplished through a process known as comparative analysis. The way it works is different facts are collected and examined with each other. The trends will show how various solutions have been introduced to address these problems in the past and current challenges impacting stakeholders.
The data will be tested based upon real world events that are taking place and objectively analyzing the different solutions. That is utilized by various states and other organizations in countering WMD related threats. This will offer insights about those protocols that are most effective. It is at this point when these ideas could be implemented as part of a larger strategy to improve countermeasures and neutralization.
For example, the Israelis have some of the most innovative counter terrorism programs in the world. Their strategy often involves using tools such as: local surveillance to monitor what is happening. Then, combining it with actionable intelligence to target and directly prevent the threat from becoming worse. This approach involves taking proactive measures and preemptively striking targets. Throughout the years, these tools have successfully protected the nation against possible WMD attacks on their major population centers.
Evidence of this can be seen in 2007, when they destroyed a nuclear research facility that was being used by Syria. This was a part of an aggressive effort to expand all WMD related programs in order to counter Israeli actions inside these areas. These ideas are showing how there are certain countries which have effective programs for countering WMD threats.
Our objectives are study these and many other programs. Then, look at the latest solutions and strategies that are being utilized. This will provide us with detailed information about how to counter potential threats in the future.
During this process, special considerations will be provided to those techniques that are most effective and learning from the mistakes of others. A possible limitation is that many of these latest strategies may not be fully uncovered. This is because a variety of governments are keeping their anti-terrorism tools and tactics under close scrutiny. As they do not want to let rouge states and organizations learn about how they are monitoring their activities. This will make it more challenging in understanding the most up-to-date strategies for mitigating these kinds of threats.
Analysis and Findings
The information that was uncovered is illustrating how governments and other organizations must use an all-encompassing approach in neutralizing WMD related threats. The data was collected through highlighting how technology must be used in coordination with preemptive planning. This means that the various agencies must work together and share information about a possible attack.
At the same time, everyone needs to improve cooperation on the international level to have more effective controls in place. This means reexamining the possible structure for reporting and determining who has access these materials. For instance, improved coordination and the availability of more common tools in detecting key compounds will help to enhance monitoring. This could be used with nanotechnology to improve detection and more effectively control anyone carrying these substances. These solutions are relatively new and have not been tried to improve neutralization strategies.
Evidence of this can be seen with observations from Kosal (2011) who said, "Nanotechnology is expected to affect the world in important ways, much as the chemical, semiconductor, and biotechnology industries have done over the past 75 years. There is tremendous interest and commensurate investment in the potential for scientific discovery at the nanoscale to deliver revolutionary breakthroughs. As researchers continue to explore and understand the unique physical phenomena of engineered nanomaterial's, technologies employing novel Nano science will begin to impact all technologies, including chemical and biological (CB) defense applications."
This is showing how incorporating more experimental solutions can improve the ability of governments to detect and monitor for WMDs. Nanotechnology is just one of many tools that can be used during the process of achieving these objectives. In empirical terms, this is indicating that new approaches and techniques must be utilized to help improve detection and the ability to mitigate WMD related threats.
Moreover, Hayes (2011) determined that directed energy technology could be used to improve monitoring and enforcement of WMD materials. This is because it is using much lower power sources that can see through various packages and containers differently (i.e. lasers and inferred / radiological solutions).
This makes it harder to transport these materials across international borders and bring them into urban population centers. These ideas are illustrating that the data is indicating how more of an emphasis needs to be placed on utilizing the latest technology to detect for WMDs. This is showing how in empirical terms that more solutions need to be introduced which are taking this kind of focus.
As a result, these facts are used to prove the hypothesis by showing how counter measures and neutralization can be enhanced. In the future, this more effectively prepares stakeholders for addressing the overall scope of the threat they are facing from WMDs. When this happens, they are capable of protecting themselves and limiting any damage.
However, the research is also illustrating that there must be a focus on understanding and adapting with changing conditions. This is because of shifts that are occurring inside the world of technology and the tactics which are utilized. If this can occur, different programs can continue to evolve with the overall nature of the threats. These factors are the key in effectively introducing countermeasures and neutralizing WMD related risks.
Summary and conclusions
Clearly, WMDs are a major threat that is becoming more common. This is because technology is making it easier to acquire these weapons and the knowledge to build / effectively deploy them. At the same time, different rogue states and terrorist organizations are showing an interest in possessing and acquiring these materials. This is troubling as it increasing the odds that some kind of WMD will be targeted at a major population center. When this happens, the odds increase of casualty rates reaching hundreds of thousands of people.
In many cases, there is a close association between rogue states and terrorist organizations. A good example of this can be seen with the Iranian government's direct support for Hezbollah. In the last few years, they have been providing them with tens of thousands of rockets and advanced technology. This is designed to increase pressure on Israel and enhance their power throughout the region. What is troubling about this relationship; is that it could be utilized as a way to pass WMDs from Iran to Hezbollah. Once this takes place, is when the odds increase of these materials will target civilians and major population centers.
As a result, the research is showing that more focus needs to be placed on improving counter measures and neutralization. One possible tool is to increase collaboration and coordination in association…