Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Employee Rights / Safety
Employee Rights and Safety: A Case Study
The individual in question is now out of a job, due mainly to circumstances that were out of her control. Yes, it is imperative for an organization to punish those who break its policies. Yet, where is the evidence in this case that point to the individual in question? Although the organization she worked for had the right to take action against the employee who had brought the drugs into the facility, its mass layoffs and coerced lie detector tests create a situation where the individual in question was wrongfully terminated.
Employers Rights
The organization was essentially acting in a reaction to the presence of drugs within its facility. According to the general rule for employment, the organization believed it had the right to terminate the individual in question based on the concept of employment-at will. This concept is defined as "an employee who us hired for an indefinite period of time without an employment contract is terminable at-will by the employer without restrictions," (Frank & Breslow 2000). Thus, the organization did have the right to terminate her employment at will based on reasons unspecified in whatever employment contract had been signed upon her attendance at the location. Being that the individual was working within a private-sector...
Here, the research suggests that "These groups of employees have historically enjoyed dissimilar levels of protection from wrongful dismissal," (Frank & Breslow 2000). This was most likely the rationale that influenced the organization to take such drastic actions as it did.
Employee Polygraph Protection Act
However, California had been one of the first states to begin to regulate the at-will rule. In this case, an employee "may be only terminated for 'good cause' or just cause,'" (Frank & Breslow 2000). This is essentially based on a covenant of good faith, where termination decisions made in bad faith are seen as a violation of public policy law. This could lead a court to decide that the individual had been wrongfully terminated as a violation of public policy. In fact, the Employee Polygraph Protection Act (EPPA) created and enacted by the federal government helps protect many employees within the private sector from being subjected to lie detector tests. California is one of only a handful of states that recognize the public policy exception to the at-will concept. Here, the research posits that "Under the public-policy exception to employment at will, an employee is wrongfully discharged…
References
Frank & Breslow. (2000). Employment-at-will. LaborLaws.com. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://laborlaws.com/block4/item414/
Muhl, Charles J. (2001). The employment-at-will doctrine: Three major exceptions. Monthly Labor Review. 3-12. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.bls.gov/opub/mlr/2001/01/art1full.pdf
OHS Health and Safety Services, Inc. (2012). California. Drug Testing Laws for All U.S. States. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.ohsinc.com/laws_state_drug_testing_laws_said.htm
U.S. Department of Labor. (2012). Employment and training administration fact sheet. Doleta.Gov. Retrieved January 26, 2012 from http://www.doleta.gov/programs/factsht/warn.htm
Legal Environment/Total Rewards: A Changing Landscape In the race for profit, employee pay has traditionally been seen by businesses as a competitive liability, and the trend for much of the 20th century was for employers to search for the cheapest, most efficient labor to protect their bottom line. Because of this approach, the U.S. government took several steps during the 20th century to protect employees from extortionary measures by employers to
American business has grown over the past several decades, so have the number of laws, rules, and regulations governing the operation of such business. These laws and regulations are generally of types: 1) to promote market competition and to keep the power of large corporations under control, and 2) to mitigate the adverse effects of business activity on individuals and organizations. These laws and regulations are often beneficial but
Employee Privacy Torts Issues relating to employee privacy have been at the forefront of businesses for many years. This has been fuelled by the dynamic workplace which changes constantly and also by employees and employers being more litigation-conscious. Technology has also spurred on employee privacy issues with e-mail and the internet being related to heightened concerns about vulnerability of employers to litigation. Many employers have thus exacerbated their concerns relating to
Employee Relations Plan: Starbucks, Inc. Most companies assert to prospective employees that the corporation offers excellent benefits and a good salary. But few corporations make such assertions part of its corporate, core mission statement. According to Starbucks, the motto of the international, Seattle-based coffee company is that "Our success depends on your success." This statement is not simply directed at Starbuck's customers, but to its employees as well. (Starbucks, "Job Center,"
Safety Incentive Programs Safety should always be a main concern for employers. It is cost-effective to care about your employees. It is good employer-employee relations. It's also great public relations when employers and employees work together for the sake of safety. Give the horse a carrot. We've all heard this expression but have you ever really thought about how true it is? Basically, reward the worker and the work will get done.
The answers offered by the high profit seekers as stakeholders is to take advantage of the immigrant, by demanding high work hours, and even in some cases taking advantage of the individual's low level of knowledge about the rights and responsibilities of the employee and the employer, denying overtime pay, when earned, unauthorized deductions from pay, even things as simple as demanding less "ethnic" hairstyles from employees to the