Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
England - China
For managers conducting cross-border activity between England and China, there are a number of factors that should be considered. The differences between English and Chinese business culture are striking, and it is important to understand the nature of those differences and how they can affect business relations between the two countries. There are also significant differences in the economies of each country and again it is valuable for managers to understand these differences and how they may affect the business dealings between English companies and Chinese ones.
This report will analyze the differences between England and China from a number of perspectives. The first component of the report will focus on the macro-level environmental differences between the two, using the PESTLE framework as the basis of the analysis. The second component of the report will focus on the business culture of the two nations, including Geert Hofstede's cultural dimensions, Trompenaars cultural dimensions and the use of other cultural frameworks where additional light can be shed. The paper will conclude with a recap of the main differences between the two business cultures and some recommendations for English managers as to how best to approach cross-border activity between England and China. It should be noted that while the focus of the report will be on English managers, many of the statistics and coverage of these issues is focused on the United Kingdom. Likewise, "China" will refer to the People's Republic of China, excluding Taiwan, Macao and Hong Kong; the term "Chinese" will therefore focus on the PRC, primarily the Han majority.
In general, England's political climate is favourable to business. The nation has an open democracy and generally subscribes to liberalist political theory emphasizing personal and economic freedom as a mechanism to economic growth. U.S.-based think tank The Heritage Foundation (2011) compiles an economic freedom index, and the UK ranks 16th in the world, between the Netherlands and Finland. The UK is a member of the World Trade Organization, the European Union and many other multinational organizations that promote the reduction of trade barriers (CIA World Factbook, 2011). Despite being amenable to trade at the macro-level, the current UK political leadership has taken on policies that serve to reduce business confidence and harm the UK economy (Wood & Wachman, 2011). Given that political leaders seem intent of blaming the soft economy on situations like inflation that have only occurred recently after their spending cuts, a reversal of course to a more intelligent solution seems unlikely. The British political landscape is therefore currently poor for business.
The UK has the world's 9th-largest economy with GDP of $2.189 trillion in 2010. This is worth a GDP per capita of $35,100, which ranks 36th in the world (CIA World Factbook, 2011). The current estimates for GDP growth are 1.6% for 2010, following two years of economic decline. Government estimates for 2011 growth are now considered to be wildly optimistic (Wood & Wachman, 2011). The UK does not count China among its main export partners, but China is a significant import partner, accounting for 8.88% of imports to the UK, the third-highest figure for any country (CIA World Factbook, 2011).
The social environment is generally favourable in the UK. British citizens are in favour of trade in general, and have no significant objections to trade with China. In the difficult economic times low cost goods, in which China specializes, increase in appeal so the social environment is especially favourable at present for imports from China. The world's current technological environment is characterized by a rapid pace of change. The UK is one of the world's technology leaders, while China specializes in low-cost production of older technologies. China's technological capabilities are increasing, however, and it is beginning to narrow the comparative advantage gap with Western nations (LiveScience, 2007). The UK has relatively stringent environmental laws and these can create opportunity with respect to developing new technologies but can also discourage business development. The legal environment in the UK is characterized by strong rule of law, strong intellectual property protections and sophisticated dispute resolution mechanisms.
China's political environment is substantially different from that of the United Kingdom. China is a totalitarian state with Communist roots. Personal freedoms in China are minimal and the government maintains strict control over access to information (Vascellaro & Chao, 2010). China ranks 135th on the economic freedom report, between Mauritania and Cameroon (Heritage Foundation, 2011). This reflects the heavy hand of the government in almost all aspects of economic activity in China, be it directly or through the government-financed banking system. The political environment in China, however, is largely stable. Unless one of the major hot-button issues (Taiwan, Tibet, etc.) flares up and threatens to destabilize China, it is expected that the current political environment will change little going forward. China is a member of the World Trade Organization but is still relatively reluctant to engage in the process of international trade liberalization.
China is the world's 2nd largest economy, worth $9.872 trillion. This equates to a GDP per capita of $7,400. China's GDP is growing rapidly. Official estimates have China's growth rate at 10.3%, with only a slight slowdown recorded during the West's financial crisis (CIA World Factbook, 2011). While these figures need to be taken with a grain of salt -- the Chinese government has admitted that their GDP statistics are a work of fiction (Reuters, 2010) -- China's economic growth has been impressive since the country began to open its economy.
China's social environment is generally stable and supportive of government policy. China's culture emphasizes collectivism and this helps to maintain social order. In general, Chinese are a trading people and should be viewed as enthusiastic about international trade in particular. As noted above, China is closing the technological gap and developing competency in innovation. This implies that China will be able to compete more effectively in the technological environment going forward than they have in the past.
The environment poses an interesting challenge for China. On one hand, China's environmental record is appalling and the country is one of the world's most polluted, to the point where it is constricting economic growth (Patience, 2011). On the other hand, this has spurred China to take a leading role in the development and production of alternative energy technology. Part of China's economic strategy is to be the global leader in so-called 'green' energy and the country is now the world leader in wind turbines and solar panels (Bradsher, 2010). The legal environment is complex in China, and bears the heavy hand of the central government. Any foreign company operating in China or trading with China will need to either employ a well-connected legal counsel in China or do the business in Hong Kong to avoid Chinese law altogether.
Despite the differences in government, culture and other environments, there is a good framework in place for trade between China and the United Kingdom. China's low cost production appeals to British consumers. The UK does not, however, appear in the list of the top trade partners for China (CIA World Factbook, 2011). For British firms wanting to do business in China to take advantage of a competitive advantage in production cost and comparative advantage in technological innovation, it is essential to understand the political/legal environment in particular. The Chinese system is very different than the Western system. There are few legal protections for foreigners, and almost no protections for intellectual property. British firms and managers often must partner with Chinese firms in order to gain protection for their interests in the nation. Yet while the risks are high, for those firms able to navigate the complexity of the Chinese market, tremendous opportunities lie in the market's size and rapid pace of growth.
There are substantial cultural differences between the UK and China. For English managers seeking to do business in China, it is essential that these cultural differences are understand at both the underlying philosophical level and at the practical level. With respect to the former, it is essential to understand that China does not share the Western philosophical tradition, so Chinese business people operate with completely different underlying beliefs and value systems. It is essential to relate to these systems to truly succeed in the Chinese market. On the practical level, it should be understood that Chinese managers are not idiots -- they do not expect Westerners to understand every nuance of Chinese culture and are unlikely to take offense at minor gaffes. However, an effort to show deference for their culture, traditions, business practices and language will naturally be appreciated. It is with this in mind that the cultural differences between the English and Chinese will be examined.
The special role of Hong Kong as a cultural bridge between England and China cannot be ignored in this discussion. Hong Kong managers have exposure to both Chinese and English culture and economic systems. They are often fluent in both Cantonese and English, and sometimes Mandarin as…[continue]
"England - China For Managers Conducting Cross-Border" (2011, April 15) Retrieved December 9, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/england-china-for-managers-conducting-50495
"England - China For Managers Conducting Cross-Border" 15 April 2011. Web.9 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/england-china-for-managers-conducting-50495>
"England - China For Managers Conducting Cross-Border", 15 April 2011, Accessed.9 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/england-china-for-managers-conducting-50495
Steps were also taken to organize a stock market in Lahore (Burki, 1999, pp.127-128). Also organized during this period were the Pakistan Industrial and Credit Investment Corporation (PICIC) and the Industrial Development Bank of Pakistan (IDBP), both of which were important to industrial development, obtaining "large amounts of capital from the World Bank, the former for investment in large industries, the latter in relatively smaller enterprises" (Burki, 1999, p. 128). This
Al Queda Has Shaped the Way How Al Qaeda has shaped the way the United States uses counter terrorism? Transnational terrorist networks are currently the greatest emerging threat to global security. They operate in dispersed groups with leaders who are capable of blending into their surroundings and becoming part of the landscape. This aspect alone makes them difficult to counter. Further, they operate as non-state entities with no accountable sovereign. They threaten
For example, Shu-Acquaye (2007) cites the basic differences in the legal systems in various parts of the world as contributing to the different approaches to corporate governance. Likewise, Shu-Acquaye cites these differences and adds, "The American corporate governance system adheres to the idea of shareholder primacy. Because the United Kingdom, Austria, and Canada share a legal system based on English common law and equity principles, they are similar to
Public finance is an area of study that has received a great deal of attention throughout the years. In recent years public finance has become more of a critical issue because of the economic recession that has plagued the country. There are various methods of public finance that exist and remain as a popular way for local and state governments to raise revenues. For the purposes of this discussion the
A favorite target for conspiracists today as well as in the past, a group of European intellectuals created the Order of the Illuminati in May 1776, in Bavaria, Germany, under the leadership of Adam Weishaupt (Atkins, 2002). In this regard, Stewart (2002) reports that, "The 'great' conspiracy organized in the last half of the eighteenth century through the efforts of a number of secret societies that were striving for
Buildings will be required to obtain energy certification. At the current time, construction engineers are the most likely candidate for the job. This being the case, it is estimated that approximately 12,000 engineers will need to be retained to carry out these functions (Coverdale, 2002). As one can see, the EPBD will place a strain on the construction industry in terms of knowledge and the manpower needed to carry out
Disrupting America's economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists Even as the world continues to struggle with the terrible shock from the September 11 attacks in New York and Washington, one principle lesson has already become clear: disrupting our economic system is a fundamental objective of terrorists. Prior to September 11, our economic environment was certainly not immune to terror, in comparison to many other nations; we lived relatively terror-free. Now,