Ethics Reproductive Technologies - There Essay

PAGES
2
WORDS
768
Cite

The next objection of IVF separating the procreation and marital aspects of marriage and in the end damaging the marital relationship was totally untrue in this case. This couple had a very strong relationship and going through the process of gestational surrogacy strengthen their martial relationship as opposed to damaging it. The last objection of adoption is a better answer to the trouble of childlessness may very well be true for a lot of people. One cannot argue the fact that there are a lot of children out there that need to have good homes and there are many couples that could benefit tremendously from this avenue. But in the case of the couple in this article the idea of having a biological child was something that was very strong from them, thus making the path that they took the best one for them. IVF, just like many other things in life, is a personal choice that people should be able to make without having to feel that they are stepping on someone's toes because they don't agree with it. There are many things in life that are right for some people and completely wrong fro someone else. People need to be given...

...

No one should have these kind of decisions made for them.
In the case of the couple in this article IVF and gestational surrogacy were the right options for them. This was also the right choice for the surrogate mom who carried their unborn child and gave them the opportunity to be biological parents. At one point in the article the author referred to this as something like organ donation and in a way it really is. In the case of organ donations many people's lives are saved everyday. In the case of gestational surrogacy, the surrogate mother is donating her womb so that a life can be produced. This created a happy ending for everyone who was involved.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Kuczynski, Alex. 2008. "Her Body, My Baby." Web. 5 July 2011. <

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/30/magazine/30Surrogate-t.html?_r=2&pagewanted=1>

Singer, Peter. IVF: The Simple Case. Biomedical Ethics. By Degrazia, David, Mappes,

Thomas A. And Brand-Ballard, Jeffrey. 2010. 7th ed. Columbus: McGraw-Hill. 2010.


Cite this Document:

"Ethics Reproductive Technologies - There" (2011, July 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-reproductive-technologies-there-43097

"Ethics Reproductive Technologies - There" 05 July 2011. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-reproductive-technologies-there-43097>

"Ethics Reproductive Technologies - There", 05 July 2011, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ethics-reproductive-technologies-there-43097

Related Documents

2009). The susceptibility is highest is the first month of the transplantation and decreases afterwards. it, however, remains high even after 12 following. Susceptibility is highest among kidney recipients who are more likely to develop the infection 12 months after the transplantation. They have a lower mortality rate than liver transplant recipients. The study also reflected a trend in increasing antimicrobial resistance among these susceptible recipients. The E-coli strain

Concern also focused on the imbalance of the trade because the market is for only those who can afford, therefore only gives chance for the well-off. The black market has been referred to as the transplant trade outside of the United States. Legalization of the international organ trade would lead to increased supply, lowering prices. Therefore the poor might be able to afford such organs as well. Bioethics is also

That is especially true because in the vast majority of cases, prospective organ donors are younger than their surviving family members since only organs from relatively young people are suitable for use as transplant organs. However, those family members who do provide consent to harvest their loved one's organs invariably come to regard that choice as something that gives meaning to the untimely deaths of their loved ones. In

The flaws have been reverted through the policy of no-give, no-take, "under this system in order to receive an organ the individual has to previously signed their organ donor card" (Alexander, 2004). The merit of such policy is that "it satisfies most people's moral intuitions, the people are comfortable with the morality of reciprocity, those who are willing to give should be the first to receive" (Alexander, 2004). In 2004,

However, these side effects are a small price to pay in light of the alternative, which is often a severely compromised quality of life and early death. The donor should consider several topics. There is no additional financial risk to being an organ donor. Furthermore, the body is not disfigured during organ removal; thus, open casket funerals are possible. Also, donated organs will be used for transplants into recipients

Organ Donation There is a space for a small pink sticker on everyone's driver's license which you choose to affix or to leave off of the identification. The sticker signifies that, should you be in a car accident and are declared to be brain-dead with no chance of recuperating, you agree to allow medical professionals to donate your organs to people who are in very dire need of them. When people