) and Group C (control group 2) will have no lunch at all. Testing hypothesis: Student's grades of the students receiving the nutritionally balanced lunches will increase, because of improved memory and attention span, compared with students in the control groups. Group B. will have a glucose spike of energy and crash, Group C. will have not enough glucose in their systems at all.

Variables that will remain the same: Students will be in the same types of classes. Improvement, not overall intelligence or GPA will be measured by the experiment.

Variables that will be tested: Students will eat the same type of nutritionally balanced or unbalanced lunch (or no lunch at all) for a period of one month. They will not be allowed to bring their lunches to school, regardless of how they ate before, depending on their group assignation.

Data: Performance on tests, attention span in class, and retention of material as measured on quizzes and papers vs. The month previous when students were...

And C, a performance decrease in Group a or inconclusive results, that is, not enough of a measurable performance increase or decrease in afternoon classes, would all suggest that the hypothesis was invalid or had to be tested with more controls.
Works Cited

Colson, Deborah. (26 Feb 2006). "How Food Can Affect Your Child's Mood."

Junior Magazine. Retrieved 21 Feb 2007 at http://www.juniormagazine.co.uk/page/juniormagazine?entry=how_food_can_affect_your

Delisio, Ellen. (26 Feb 2006). "How Breakfast Choices Affect Learning."

Education World. Retrieved 21 Feb 200t at http://www.education-world.com/a_issues/chat/chat168.shtml