French Indian War Altar Political, Economic, Ideological Essay

PAGES
4
WORDS
1294
Cite

¶ … French Indian war altar political, economic, ideological relations American colonies Britain? In what ways did the French-Indian War alter political, economic, ideological relations between the American colonies and Great Britain?

For many years, tensions had been simmering between England and France, the dominant European powers in control of the colonial territories in the Americas. The two nations' relationship was even more complicated due to the various tribal alliances of Native Americans. At the onset of the French-Indian War, by and large, the Indians favored the French. The French tended to be more honest and aboveboard in their dealings with the natives. The French were more interested in establishing economic trade roots in America, rather than creating colonies, a situation which the Indians preferred. In contrast, the British population of settlers in the colonies was 250,000 in 1700 and 1.25 million in 1750 -- a staggering growth in a relatively short period of time (Kindig 2010:1).

The British also had a substantial economic as well as political interest in the colonies. The colonies were an abundant supply of raw materials such as copper, hemp, tar, and turpentine. "They also required a great deal of money, and so they provided that all of these American products be shipped exclusively to England (the Navigation Acts). In an effort to raise revenue and simultaneously interfere with the French in the Caribbean, a 6 pence tax on each gallon of molasses was imposed in 1733…Enforcement of these regulations became difficult, so the English government established extensive customs services, and vice-admiralty courts empowered to identify, try, and convict suspected smugglers. These devices were exclusive of, and superior to, the colonial mechanisms of justice" (Kindig 2010). Thus, the colonists even before the thus had reason to be dissatisfied by British usurpation of their authority.

A dispute over territory in Ohio proved to be the precipitating cause of the French-Indian War. In November 1753. Major George Washington was sent...

...

When the French refused, Washington began to build a fort nearby, thinking "if he could not drive the French from the area, he would at least contest their presence with his own stockade. A combined force of French soldiers and their native allies overwhelmed Fort Necessity on July 3, 1754, marking the start of the French and Indian War in the New World…The next few years witnessed French successes on the battlefield against the English, including General Edward Braddock's defeat in 1755" ("French-Indian Wars," Ohio History Central, 2005). These successes were largely the result of the native support of the French.
While the British colonists appealed to the King for permission to raise armies and monies to defend themselves, they were refused. "English officers in America were also widely contemptuous of colonials who volunteered for service" (Kindig 2010). However, the British were determined to hold on to their colonies -- Prime Minister William Pitt feared French dominion over Europe, if it established control over the valuable trade through the New World. "In 1758, sizable numbers of British soldiers arrived to carry out Pitt's plan. With colonial assistance, British soldiers captured Fort Duquesne that year. In 1759, the English captured both Fort Niagara and Quebec, France's major city in the New World. Montreal fell the following year, leaving England in control of France's possessions in North America" ("French-Indian Wars," Ohio History Central, 2005).

While imported British troops made up a substantial portion of the fighting force against the French, many colonists did gain a military orientation during the war in the tactics of the King's Army, which they were later able to use to great effect during the Revolutionary War. Washington's experience during the French-Indian War proved to be formative in shaping his military strategy as a general in the Revolutionary War. Another important development was the Albany Plan of Union. In June 1754 "delegates from most of the northern colonies and representatives…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

"French-Indian Wars." Ohio History Central. Ohiohistorycentral.org. July 1, 2005.

December 3, 2010.

http://www.ohiohistorycentral.org/entry.php?rec=498

"The French and Indian War." Power Point. December 3, 2010
December 3, 2010. http://www.ushistory.org/Declaration/related/frin.htm
http://www.wvculture.org/history/indland.html


Cite this Document:

"French Indian War Altar Political Economic Ideological" (2010, December 04) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/french-indian-war-altar-political-economic-49190

"French Indian War Altar Political Economic Ideological" 04 December 2010. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/french-indian-war-altar-political-economic-49190>

"French Indian War Altar Political Economic Ideological", 04 December 2010, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/french-indian-war-altar-political-economic-49190

Related Documents

REVOLUTION & FRENCH-INDIAN WAR Revolution/French-Indian War The French and Indian War and the American Revolutionary War were fairly close together in terms of timing and they had a lot of parallels and commonalities including some of the major personnel in the conflict. The French and Indian War as well as the Revolutionary War both involved people and countries that were fighting for much the same thing, that being control of lands

French and Indian War: Braddock and Thereafter How little credit is given to a Commander, who perhaps after a defeat, in relating the cause justly lays the blame on some individual whose cowardly behav'r betray'd the whole to ruin; how little does the World consider the Circumstances, and how apt are Mankind to level their vindictive Censures against the unfortunate Chief, who perhaps merited least of the blame. George Washington, 1755 Who

French and Indian War
PAGES 13 WORDS 4779

French and Indian War Cultural Analysis of French and Indian War The French and Indian War is considered to be part of Seven Years War that took place from 1756 till 1763. It is one of the most fierce and bloodiest battles that ever took place and in which thousands of people were killed. Participants of the war included French, Indians and British. It is believed that the war was fought in

French and Indian War the
PAGES 2 WORDS 633

In 1754, Anglo-American colonists led by George Washington attempted to expel the French from the upper Ohio Valley, however, Washington was defeated but the defeat captured the attention of British Prime Minister Thomas Pelham-Holles, Duke of Newcastle, who called for a retaliatory strike ("Milestones: 1750-1775"). Eventually, General Edward Braddock was sent to North America but he failed to make alliances with Native Americans and colonial leaders failed to cooperate

Family ties enabled him to straddle both worlds. Led his army in support of the British; remembered for atrocities his army supposedly committed and his attempts to keep tribal lands. Wampum Belt: Wampum=certain sea shells. Used for trade, but not exactly currency. Different colored shells valued differently. Wampum belts were woven to commemorate special occasions/given as gifts. Also used a sort of writing/memory. Hurons: Also called "Wendat." Occupied Ontario area. Iroquoian

...[p. 41] Reasons may be given, why an Act ought to be repeal'd, and yet obedience must be yielded to it till that repeal takes place. The intent of most colonists, was to create change through the proper channels, as has been described by the Philadelphia congress, as having occurred over the ten years bridging the two previous declarations. A consummate expert on the War of Independence, writing in the early twentieth