Guardian Blue Early Warning System Research Paper
- Length: 10 pages
- Sources: 10
- Subject: Terrorism
- Type: Research Paper
- Paper: #76051118
Excerpt from Research Paper :
When the overindulge had taken place, the GuardianBlue Early Warning System not only alarmed but also categorized the probable reason of the problem to be a fluoride overfeed. This then permitted a quick reply before customers of water were unprotected to possibly hazardous heights of fluoride. Fluoride, while deadly at reasonable to high doses, is usually measured helpful for dental health at doses that were very low. The most normally suggested dosage of fluoride for individuals is 1 mg per day.
The GuardianBlue has strength when it comes down alarming things way ahead of time. A lot of people are not aware that the GuardianBlue system had alarmed almost three full days before a catastrophic pipe burst and had noticed pipe burst proceedings in a lot of key United States cities? It is accurate, consuming its' distinctive algorithm with often checked limits, GuardianBlue had seen a change in both the conductivity and chlorine which is at the same time. Generally these specific variations are well thought-out as small enough and are not noticed by the human eye, but the algorithm saw the nonconformity and ongoing disturbing roughly 70 hours that happened before a 36? main broke, dropping millions of loads of water straight into downtown. It was noticed that the pipe had a crack that was small, which is the reason for the conductivity and chlorine that altered, by reason of reduced water age. Around 3 days later, the disastrous break happened. The arrangement was 2 miles upstream from where the break had occurred. This specific borough could possibly name this occasion in the Plant Library, and should it observe a comparable impression, the event monitor would remember the name provided in the Plant Library. The EPA has sonce quotes that the usual pipe breaks prices about $28 million dollars in patch-up and lost income.
Another one of the strengths regarding the GuardianBlue Event Detection System is its reliability. There was an incidence where a drinking water facility on a military base was constantly getting phone calls from customers of their water who were irritable of a weird taste and scent. Every time a person would call in, somebody from a drinking water plant worker would go to a water sampling place in the distribution system and then they would run a test on the water. After several unsuccessful attempts at trying to figure out the cause of the odd water and persistent complaints, the GuardianBlue Event Detection System was installed. This device then monitored the water excellence on a continuous basis and consequently made it easier to reply and associate the poor water quality to the criticisms (Bush). They exposed low flow places and dead heads that are among the distribution system. With knowing this new material in hand, the plant operators enhanced their blooming agenda and importantly improved the water quality ensuing in no more grouchy phone calls.
Some of the weakness of the system is the alarm system. Agent alarms in the system cannot be systematically tested since the agent list is patented and supposed agents are dangerous to work with. Basically the third party testing with thirteen concrete agents has been accomplished by the EPA and Battelle in an Environmental Technology Confirmation analysis. Results of these studies confirm that the GuardianBlue is capable of precisely categorizing agents.
One thing good about the GuardianBlue is that it is very cost effective. Why? Because the first priority for any event detection system is that it does a low-priced detecting of contaminants so that people and organization can be protected in some effective way that does not cost that much. Though the capability to perceive contamination is serious, if a system is to be accomplished of proposing a probable return on investment (ROI) and attain extensive deployment (Hach Company GuardianBlue Early Warning System). It is presumed that the GuardianBlue Early Warning System spends extremely little of its entire time in a definite alarm condition. So the question is what is going on with it for the rest of the time? Justification of the cost can include the following:
1. Optimization of day-to-day procedures in the interior the system monitored,
2. Provided that alarms for effective events not correlated to pollution threats,
3. Substitute grab sampling for observance with other procedures with unceasing monitoring,
4. Document system operation differences to support with planning upkeep activities or scheduling and modifying major organization elevations (line replacement)
5. Constructing consumer self-assurance by constantly system water excellence
Such proficiencies can reduce the cost of procedures for the system that is being monitored, and arrange for evidence that can be beneficial to those people who utilize the monitored system.
Acceptability of the GuardianBlue Early Warning System
The GuardianBlue Early Warning System is acceptability is vital to plants employees, neighbors, and leadership. The capability to normalize the sensors and manager by using a single manufacturer has recognized to be cost-effective in the long run for employees and neighbors (Drinking Water Contamination Warning Systems-Design and Implementation of an Online Water Quality Monitoring). Years in the past, when the GuardianBlue Early Warning System plant was in its design stage, bids had been taken in order for the initial pump station basis water monitoring instruments and analyzers on an separate basis and the low-price bidders were granted the jobs. But the succeeding complications ascending from opposing plumbing and wiring necessities, large space consumption, and the probability of polluting and other accuracy-harmful effects soon worn the original cost savings.
The cost of an integrated monitoring panel is also offset quickly by the staff's increased ability to adapt treatment processes to incoming water conditions. Having several hours' notice of the changes in the source water builds efficiency. The positive response based on truthful readings aids in preventing the penalties and charges of under- and overtreatment. The charge of a combined monitoring panel is likewise offset rapidly by the staff's improved skill to familiarize treatment procedures to entering water conditions. Having numerous hours' announcement of the fluctuations in the source water shapes competence. The upbeat reply based on precise readings helps stop the costs and prices of under- and overtreatment.
According to feedback from people in the field regarding the GuardianBlue Early Warning System has been very positive. It requires very little maintenance. Those who are operating it just have to flush out the sampling trench infrequently to spotless up debris that might have clumped up on the bottom." One of the main compensations added has been the precision of the readings. Before the new the GuardianBlue Early Warning System had been installed, it was frequently uncertain whether doubtful readings reflected an analyzer concern or a water quality matter.
The GuardianBlue Early Warning System shows reading that is clear. For example, if a person sees a really low turbidity reading, for instance, it will indicate that there is a pre-chlorination failure, since the chlorine is made-up to corrode the iron out of solution and then start creating turbidity. This is a very reliable strategy because then the LDO monitor will be able tells everyone when iron is on the high side since the DO interpretation will start droping off as the iron begins sucking all of the oxygen out. Manganese will also be able to do the same thing. The GuardianBlue Early Warning System unit also helps in defining the oxidation state of the metal elements so that they can be sufficiently chlorinated for elimination. The GuardianBlue Early Warning System is able to provide unceasing material on existing conditions of the water arriving in the system, operators can then effortlessly create precise source water excellence baselines for trending also for determining suitable alarm set points that can alert operators to transient circumstances. This system is recommended highly because its is an industrialized system that services an selection of mutual logical arrangement that is fixed with cutting-edge explanatory procedures to make available detection/documentation-reaction systems that are proficient of improving system safety. A diversity of real world sites and challenging procedures were utilized to confirm the effectiveness of the system. The structure is exposed to be an applied amount to help notice and describe backflow events, therefore contradicting terrorist activities.
Bennett, K.B. "Representation Aiding: Complimentary Decision Support for a Complex Dynamic Control Task." IEEE Control Systems 13.5 (2008): 23-34.
Berry, J., et al. "ensor Placement in Municipal Water Networks With Temporal Integer Programming Models." Water Resources Planning & Management.-ASCE, 3 May 2006.
Burns, C.M Hajdukiewicz J.R. Ecological Interface Design. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 2004.
Bush, G.W. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 9: Defense of United States agriculture and food. 30 January 2004. 21 March 2012. .
"Drinking Water Contamination Warning Systems-Design and Implementation of an Online Water Quality Monitoring." U.S. Army Public Health Command. 28 March 2010. 3 April 2010.
Hach Company GuardianBlue Early Warning System. 21 March 2012. .
Hart, W.E., et al. "A Sensor Placement Optimization Toolkit for Drinking Water Contaminant Warning System Design. ." World Envir. & Water Resources Congress, Tampa, Fla, 2007.…