Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Phone numbers are displayed liberally. A stop-smoking hotline is listed with a toll-free telephone number. Links to sponsoring organizations like the Centers for Disease Control allow visitors to read more, and a "Get expert help" section invites viewers to use instant messaging to communicate with a "National Cancer Institute smoking cessation counselor."
Illustrations are used sparingly. No negative illustrations such as those depicting lungs decayed by cancer are included, keeping the imagery on the Web site positive and inoffensive. Most of the illustrations included on smokefree.gov are photographs depicting men and women exercising and enjoying the great outdoors. The images refresh themselves often, like a slide show. The smiling faces on the models imply that quitting smoking will make anyone feel healthier and more alive. Inclusion of people from various ethnic groups in the smokefree.gov photo database is helpful in reaching a broad audience. Background of the Web site is white, and no distracting or extraneous pictures are used anywhere on the site.
Headings are used frequently but judiciously, usually as hypertext links to a new subject.
Font is ten point and easy on the eyes; no fancy lettering is used and the font also remains consistent throughout the Web site.
Graphs are included on smokefree.gov but only if the reader chooses to input information about his or her smoking status, age, weight and gender. The graphs compare smoker vs. nonsmoker risks of death, and can offer some compelling motivation to quit.
The smokefree.gov Web site is easy to navigate because the frames accompany each page. Frames include link to the home/front page and to all other subject headers so that users can move around the site easily. Also, a bottom frame on each page offers external links.
One main navigational issue with the "Online Guide to Quitting" is that the document does not flow. The reader must click on each section from the main content menu, and cannot click "next" to leaf through pages successively as with a book. Instead, a reader must go back to the subject menu to click on the next page. Therefore, navigation through the "Online Guide to Quitting" is tedious. Especially because the content in each section is brief, sometimes only taking up a few lines, the Web designers should allow the online guide to be read more like a book, in consecutive order without having to hit "Back" only to go forward in the text. Similarly, links within each chapter of the online guide sometimes direct the reader away from that page. The only other annoyance with smokefree.gov navigation is that the external links open in the same browswer page automatically; having them open in a new browser window would have been more helpful.
The smokefree.gov Web site is relatively small in scope. The bulk of the Web site is comprised of the "Online Guide to Quitting," which is a brief document published in hypertext. Except for downloadable content, much of which is written in the same style and including similar content as the Web site itself, little more is offered. Viewers can browse through a list of scientific studies that are recruiting participants. Each listing includes the sponsoring organization, often a university, whether or not the study is actively recruiting, and the research purpose. Also, eligibility criteria and contact information are listed. The studies included raise some suspicions about the motivations for the smokefree.gov Web site. In many ways, the site seems devoted toward boosting the pharmaceutical industry and medical establishment. Yet the medical and pharmaceutical industries do possess a plethora of resources to help people quit smoking, as well as the requisite research to back those resources up. If the smokefree.gov Web site offered more links to empirical data related to its content, then it would seem more credible.
London, F., Rankin, S.H., Stallings, K.D. (2005). Patient education in health and illness
5 thed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
National Cancer Institute. Retrieved June 16, 2008 at http://www.cancer.gov/
Smokefree.gov. Web site retrieved June 16, 2008 at http://www.smokefree.gov/index.asp[continue]
"Health Website Smoking Cessation Is" (2008, June 16) Retrieved December 5, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/health-website-smoking-cessation-is-29302
"Health Website Smoking Cessation Is" 16 June 2008. Web.5 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/health-website-smoking-cessation-is-29302>
"Health Website Smoking Cessation Is", 16 June 2008, Accessed.5 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/health-website-smoking-cessation-is-29302
Arriving at a Solution and Selecting Intervention Strategies Program Goal: To help smokers view smoking cessation as a positive life change, rather than as a deprivation. Objective: Focus on personal responsibility in the program, emphasizing that the decision whether or not to smoke is a personal choice. Implementing the Plan Program Goal: Give participants skills to deal with stressful situations without smoking. Objective: Send participants into stressful situations knowing that they will trigger the urge
Smoking Cessation: One of the most important aspects in enhancing the effectiveness of healthcare services is to promote the professional role of the nurse to provide health promotion and disease preventive care. This can be achieved through collaboration with other healthcare professionals and consumer groups in the community in redesigning healthcare that can assist in achievement of the goals of Healthy People 2020. An example of a focus area that could
Smoking Cessation -- Outline Addictive Behavior Smoking vs. illegal drugs Desire to return to smoking The business of smoking cessation Dangers and the Surgeon General's warning Smoking Cessation Programs Pills Patches Nicotine Gum "Cold Turkey' Hypnosis Support Groups Smoking Education Tobacco Companies Parents Smoking Cessation Smoking cigarettes has been found to be even more addictive than using many illegal drugs. Because of this, those that choose to quit smoking often struggle with it, and many of them return to smoking, even after quitting for a long period
Community Philosophy The current community philosophy regarding smoking among teens is foundational to the development of a comprehensive risk behavior intervention standard. Smoking behaviors among teens in the community are highly visible, while other risk behaviors are more hidden, it is therefore clear that smoking cessation in this age group could prove a substantial beginning in both the secondary prevention of long-term adult smoking and for the overall goal of reducing
Nurses, who have first hand knowledge and understanding of how to live healthy and how to take proper care of themselves, are far better equipped to teach others about these concepts. Certain populations can benefit greatly from prevention, especially those who are prone to specific types of diseases or conditions. One of the most common behaviors that leads to many chronic and often very damaging health conditions is smoking. Smoking
According to Zoller, scholars and/or practitioners proponents of workplace health promotion (WHP) generally assume that employees universally welcome the programs. Perhaps, the primary delimitation that could be contributed to health and wellness programs would be that one of the other would not be wanted by employees. Consequently, health promotion literature that deems the programs to be "pro-social" endeavors designed in employees' best interests frequently fail to engage employees' participation. Additional delimitations
Smoking Ban Tobacco smoke should certainly be considered a toxic chemical, and its risks to human health have been well-known for decades. Any reasonable person -- or indeed anyone who is even slightly familiar with the medical and scientific evidence -- would certainly know this today. Forty years ago, the federal government banned tobacco advertising from radio and television and put warning labels on tobacco products, while class action lawsuits have