History Legal Framework of Labor Management Relations Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

History of Labor Relations in the United States:

From Industrialization to the Present Day

According to the textbook, Labor Relations, by Arthur A. Sloane & Fred Witney, the history of labor relations in the United States, has seen the increasingly professional nature of the labor union towards the end of the 20th century and the beginning of the 21st century. This phenomena has caused union and management to form a more amicable relationship between one another, by in large, in many industries. However, this positive relationship, over the course of the history of the United States history, has been a relatively recent development. Legally speaking, labor unions have gained more rights in terms of their bargaining power with management, and workers have gained the right to freely organize and join such unions. But these legal rights came only with great difficulty.

The American public's attitude towards unionization has also alternately waxed and waned. Thus, although the legal history of the union in the 20th century has largely been marked with positive developments, favoring and protecting worker's efforts to join unions and to create unions, a historian cannot state categorically that labor movements and unionization movements have not had their difficulties and setbacks in public perceptions as well as in membership rosters. Still, the protective legislation that made unions an integral part of the national fabric, remains, and continues to give workers crucial collective leverage in their negotiations with management structures.

One of the most interesting aspects of "the state of unions today," as Sloane and Whitney term their first chapter, is the fact that 'labor' in the term 'labor unions' no longer refers simply to industrialized labor, in its current negotiating relationship with management. The 'white collar' labor leader is often the current face of labor unions today, in many crucial industries and professional organizations. (42). However, even though labor organizers of both white and blue collar organizations, are not in a consistently adversarial relationship with management, this does not mean that labor leaders lack so-called 'staying power' as leaders of organizations in their role as advocates for members. (3-4).

Rather, labor organizations have had to change with the changing times, where industry and labor are no longer viewed as adversaries, but frequently as partners whom attempt to make businesses profitable and fair for employees and employers. Labor organizations also act as advocates and voices for workers within the context of particular industries, demanding rights and benefits for their workers, as well as recognition of issues specific and pertinent to different spheres of industry and organization. Thus 'labor' as a movement is no longer as unified as it once was, but has become increasingly diverse. Labor unions have themselves taken on managements and the organization of business structures, although they always attempt, at least in theory, to represent 'the people' of their membership.

Union optimism has fluctuated in recent years given what many of the older unions have viewed as the increasing power of middle management within specific spheres of industry. (15) The 1980's were a particularly dark time for traditional labor, especially with the breaking of the unions during the early part of that era, beginning with that of the air traffic controllers. Most unions remain optimistic in the present day, however, particularly in regards to the performance of such organizations as teacher's unions and other professional organizations. (15-18). The death of unionization, despite America's increasingly white-collar image, has not come into being, as was once predicted. Rather, unions have changed their character and tone.

To understand the conflicted view of unions today, however, one must understand the history of labor unionization as a movement, not simply within the United States, but a movement that stretches back to the 1700s in Europe. The first unions met with quite limited success because of government intervention in their activities, and the fact that their activities were viewed as ideologically suspect. The relationship between 'masters' and 'servants' was ideologically fraught in Europe for religious and political, as well as economic reasons, and the idea that individuals could mobilize from 'the bottom up' was frowned upon. (51-52)

The American ideology of individualism and worker autonomy also initially ran counter to unionization, although the heavy class stigma against worker's unions was not present in America, as it was in Europe. The Knights of Labor initially failed as an organization, but the American Federation of Labor, in its wake, proved to be a success, and proved to workers that unionization was possible to act as a counter to the successes of management and industry. (55-58). Many of the early conflicts between management and labor were marked by violence, and labor was, at the turn of the century and in the wake of industrialization in America, viewed with suspicion as potentially socialist in nature.

Despite this, labor continued to organize successfully over the course of the 1900's, weathering legal setbacks in times of greatest prosperity, such as the 1920's, and during the wartime era, where labor's efforts to protect workers rights were demonized as anti-American and counter to the war effort. (58) The CIO's rivalry with the AFL provided another obstacle to unity in the labor movement, fragmenting the industrial voice of labor. (64) But it was only during the 1930's that labor came into its fullest flower, as American became less quick to trust in the value of capitalism, the protections of the unregulated market, and more open to consider collective socialization and mobilization as a way of obtaining a voice as laborers. World War II provided a boon to the United States industry, in that it allowed America to recover from the economic ravages of the Great Depression. It also established some precedent for government intervention in American business, as the federal government was forced to control and ration industrial output to maximize its war effort. (64)

Government intervention in industry was an extension of the protective policies of Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal. It created the precedent, in the public's mind, that not all worker-based advocacy was socialistic in nature, and government intervention in favor of workers and in control of certain industrial excesses could be positive as well as negative to the American system of values. The merging of the AFL and the CIO towards the end of the war effort marked another great victory for the modern labor movement, as these two organizations were no longer set against one another, but could work in a state of something approaching harmony. (69)

The modern labor movement's existence in the 1930's, however, has been called an era of judicial control, in that it was marked not only by a reformation of public attitude, but in terms of the American legal system's extension of public protection to labor. The courts began to protect labor's right to organize as a part of citizen's right to assemble freely. (81) The Norris-La Guardia Act of 1932, The Wagner Act of 1935, The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947, and the La Griffin Act of 1957 when viewed collectively, all provide examples of the increasingly positive legal history of labor in the nation. (82-110)

The Norris-La Guardia Act of 1932 was the first act to protect workers and to prohibit the unquestioned and far-reaching rights of employers to dictate the terms of workers by employees by fiat. Before, employers could state that no workers would be hired who did not sign a papers stating that they would not join unions. The existence of the Norris-La Guardia Act of 1932 made workers more willing to join unions even during relatively prosperous times. During the Great Depression many workers had felt driven to take any employment they could find. The passage of such an act as Norris-La Guardia Act meant that even during the difficult times of 1930's America, workers were still able to have some standing and right in the form of union advocacy.

Other pioneering acts of labor legislation were the Wagner Act of 1935, which also added to the rights of workers, and curtailed the exclusive rights of employers to dictate the terms of hiring. Officially known as the Labor Relations Act, it was enacted to protect worker's autonomous entrance into unions. The Supreme Court later upheld, in 1937, the protective terms of the action, when the National Steel Corporation attempted to violate it.

Because of the blow dealt to the economy by the Great Depression many American workers began to distrust the nature of American industrialization, even capitalism. The 1930's were thus a fairly prosperous time for the labor movement in the sense that long-standing legal prohibitions were struck down that impeded the labor movement and worker autonomy in an unfavorable economy. After World War II, however, the balance between employees and employers began to shift slightly again, in favor of management. But management never retained the same unregulated place in industry as it had before the Great Depression. The Taft-Hartley Act of 1947 ceded some bargaining power back to management at the expense of union…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"History Legal Framework Of Labor Management Relations" (2004, February 26) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/history-legal-framework-of-labor-management-165597

"History Legal Framework Of Labor Management Relations" 26 February 2004. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/history-legal-framework-of-labor-management-165597>

"History Legal Framework Of Labor Management Relations", 26 February 2004, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/history-legal-framework-of-labor-management-165597

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Legal Framework Which Provides the Foundations for

    legal framework which provides the foundations for the American system of labor / management relations. The state of labor / management relations today is very different than it was 100 years ago. Workers can actually reason with their employers and, more than anything else, employers often find themselves at the mercy of employees (due to the unions) and having to kow tow to their demands. This has both negative and

  • Labor Unions Are Associations of Workers for

    Labor unions are associations of workers for the purpose of improving the economic status and working conditions of the employees through collective bargaining with employers (Union pp). The two general types of unions are the horizontal, or craft, union, which is composed of members who are skilled in a particular craft, such as the International Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, and the vertical, or industrial, union, which includes

  • Managing Expatriate Employees Employment Law Expatriate Could

    Managing Expatriate Employees Employment Law Expatriate' could be defined as someone who has left his own country in order to find employment in another country. (Definitions of 'Expatriate on the Web) Expatriate employees in China are diverse and the numbers of employees are vast. For example, the city of Hong Kong, which became free and independent of British rule in 1997, turned into a Special Administrative Region of China. On account

  • Labor the Department of Labor Is Present

    Labor The Department of Labor is present today to promote, foster and develop the welfare of the employees or the labor force in the United States. The labor system focuses on the improvement of the working conditions and the fulfillment of opportunities for more profitable employment. As it would be known, rules and regulations are there to keep things in order. Similarly, the Labor system in the country is guided by

  • Labor and Employment Law

    decision will need to be made about the future of each one. Each decision will be supported with an analysis of the situation using the relevant legal framework. In general, companies are allowed to terminate employees if the termination is part of a downsizing, which in this case it is. Naturally, however, the issue of severance will be raised, and must be taken into consideration for each of the

  • History of Discrimination From Legislation to the

    History Of Discrimination From Legislation to the Present Day There are various form of discrimination that have been in existence over the decades, racism is just one of the oldest and most prevailing kind of discrimination. Racism is the belief that a race of people is inferior to another. Various practices in the U.S. are seen to be motivated by racism and these include the slave trade where humans are treated

  • Management Seminar Demonstrate a Basic Understanding of

    Management Seminar Demonstrate a basic understanding of the terminology, history and theories of business and management principles. Although the concept of management is already a few centuries old, the basis for the development of a science of management was laid during the Industrial Revolution. Until the 1960's diverse viewpoints on management were recognized leading to the development of a more integrated approach to management. The process approach emphasized the basic functions of

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved