Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
However, that connotation, for some people ceases to function when the discussion turns to those individuals who are crossing the boarder illegally.
The question then becomes, "should bad behavior be rewarded?" Those who cross the boarder illegally are referred to as "criminals," individuals who show utter disregard and contempt for the very fabric of law within American society. But do these individuals necessarily seek to break the law merely to take advantage of the welfare programs? Or is there a greater, more systemic problem? Borrowing from the main tenets of conflict resolution, the "structural assumptions" matrix dictates that larger more systemic problems are the root causes of individuals seeking to avoid conflict. Therefore, it can be asserted that these individuals are seeking to avoid conflict, improve the quality of life for their family and provide opportunities for their children they would normally not have access to within their home country. Consequentially, the ethical debate revolves around the ability to recognize those who are coming to the United States and provide a better life for themselves, their family and importantly their children. If any American citizen knew they could flee to Canada and find a better quality of life, there is a large probability they would do so immediately. Why should those who are seeking to vacate harsh, depraved conditions be punished with the stigma of being labeled a common criminal and denied access to the very programs that other individuals have access to that can assist those who seek solace within the United States? If the United States is to remain true to its creed as stated on the Statue of Liberty then it only follows the moral, just and ethical premise to carry out would be to provide some level of assistance to those individuals seeking to improve their quality of life within America's boarders.
Conclusion
Works Cited
Beck, Roy. "U.S. Immigration in Focus." U.S. Foreign Policy 2.31 (2010): 29-35. Print.
Bluhm, William, and Robert Heineman. Ethics and Public Policy: Methods and Cases. Princeton: Prentice Hall, 2006. Print.
"FAIR: Immigration and Welfare." FAIR: Federation for American Immigration Reform. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2010. .
Works Cited
Beck, Roy. "U.S. Immigration in Focus." U.S. Foreign Policy 2.31 (2010): 29-35. Print.
Bluhm, William, and Robert Heineman. Ethics and Public Policy: Methods and Cases. Princeton: Prentice Hall, 2006. Print.
"FAIR: Immigration and Welfare." FAIR: Federation for American Immigration Reform. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Nov. 2010. <http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServer?pagename=iic_immigrationissuecenters7fd8>.
We can see that minority status has far less to do with population size, and instead seems very much to be inclined by race, ethnicity and political power instead. This label of minority status is in many ways used as a tag by which certain groups are detained from political unity or effectiveness. To a large degree, this is a condition which relates to the nature of the Hispanic demographic,
Gene Rogers who served as the medical director for Sacramento County's Indigent Services program for the most of the last decade who has "waged a long fight against the central California country's practice of providing non-emergency medical care to illegal immigrants - a policy he says violates federal law and results in the poorest American citizens being denied the care they deserve." (Cromer, 2007) it is related in Cromer's
It is at this point when new ideas will be studied and analyzed as part of the process. This will ensure that a variety of perspectives are taken into account by government officials. (Bardach, 2000) In the case of the PRWORA, this process means looking at the impact of these changes on recipients. Over the last several years, many officials are realizing that more people need the help of these
Alien Nation is organized onto fifteen chapters, divided into three parts: (1) Introduction; Part I: Truth: (2) the View from the Tenth Circle; (3) the Pincers; (4) How Did it Happen? (5) Why Did it Happen? (6) So What? Part II: Consequences: (7) Immigration Has Consequences: Economics; (8) Immigration Has (More) Consequences: Economics II; (9) Immigration Has Consequences: Cultural, Social, Environmental...; (10) Immigration Has Consequences: Political Power; (11) Immigration Has Consequences: A
In 2004, Arizona's Proposition 200 wanted state and local governments to verify the identity and immigration status of all applicants for certain public benefits, and to require government employees to report violations (Wood pp). Attitudes about the problem have hardened in recent years in some states, both out of concern about the economic impact, particularly in a time of slow job growth, and out of concern about the security threat
social issue that I want to discuss is that of illegal immigration, particularly where it pertains to families. Undocumented migrants face numerous social and legal challenges in America, but first and foremost they are human beings, and they are only here to seek a better life. Yet, the conditions under which they come are often trying. Many are virtual slaves, others struggle with the lack of access to public