Intelligence Led Policing sounds like a great concept, police forces, intelligence gathering entities, local law enforcement and federal agencies all working together to protect the common citizen. What could be more patriotic or flag waving than that? The only problem with that entire scenario is highlighted by a passage in the proposal to accomplish that objective. The proposal states that in order to facilitate the sharing of all intelligence gathered by any law enforcement entity is to for a "Criminal Intelligence Coordinating Council (CICC)."
This CICC will be comprised of "local, state, Tribal and Federal law enforcement personnel detailed from their respective agencies." (Criminal, 2002, p. 7).
The CICC will also be structured to allow representation from 'all types of law enforcement agencies'.
The executive summary of the proposal makes a big deal out of being able to share information with all groups in order to "protect the American public against terrorism and all other criminal acts" (Criminal, p. 6). The question then becomes, who protects the American public from the CICC?"
Currently law enforcement groups at all levels are protective of the information singularly gathered. If these groups were to share all information at every level the information, whether true or not, can be used in a manner that would take away the constitutional right of American citizens to be considered innocent until proven guilty. In today's world of capable technology assisting law enforcement, analysis of criminal intent and mischief is readily available to all entities.
Sharing the resulting information from such analysis with all other law enforcement will open the door to mismanagement and corruption. Such corruption is already evident in many law enforcement entities and to provide them with additional cannon fodder would be a huge mistake.
Works Cited
Criminal Intelligence Sharing: A national plan for intelligence-led policing at the local, state and federal levels (2002)
http://www.theiacp.org/documents/pdfs/Publications/intelsharingreport.pdf, Accessed December 15, 2007
" In answer to questions 1 and 2, therefore, detectives Underwood and Freeman may be allowed to commit necessary misdemeanors or felonies in order to keep their undercover status from being revealed and compromised by invoking authorized criminality. Undercover police or detectives must engage in authorized crimes for two major reasons: to provide the suspects the change to engage in the target crime and to maintain a false identity or enhance access
In "Piaf," Pam Gems provides a view into the life of the great French singer and arguably the greatest singer of her generation -- Edith Piaf. (Fildier and Primack, 1981), the slices that the playwright provides, more than adequately trace her life. Edith was born a waif on the streets of Paris (literally under a lamp-post). Abandoned by her parents -- a drunken street singer for a mother and a
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now