Affirmative Action In The 21st Term Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1267
Cite

Actually, state agencies and institutions of higher learning have continued to rely upon the Supreme Court decisions and federal legislation to enforce the policies of affirmative action since 1978. While there are no definitive answers on whether affirmative action policies and programs are necessary, scholars and civic leaders have been engaged in hot debates to determine the implications of measures to dismantle affirmative action policies and programs. There are various reasons that prove that affirmative action policies and programs are not necessary in the 21st Century and should therefore be abolished. These reasons include & #8230;

Inability to Eliminate Discrimination:

Generally, affirmative action has been unable to wholly eliminate discrimination that is entrenched in the American government and society. While affirmative action was developed to help cure all discrimination in the United States, it is quite evident that this policy has been unable to accomplish its objective. If the affirmative action policies and programs were working, minority groups would be adequately represented in various facets of the society such as colleges and in the workplace in proportion to their numbers in the overall population. According to statistics, these policies and programs have not made significant differences in the representation of minorities.

Affirmative action has also proven to be a failure in determining discrimination and the socio-economic problems in America, which are increasingly difficult and complex to determine than anticipated by the civil rights activists. For instance, the poverty level remains relatively high among the minority groups in the United States than whites. There are also significant differences in income and employment since equal opportunity does not necessarily contribute to equal success rates. Generally, affirmative action has failed to achieve its purpose since racial inequalities continue to persist, especially with regards to pay between Blacks/Latinos and Whites ("Where Affirmative Action Stands Today," 2009).

Probable Racial Segregation:

The other explanation why affirmative action is unnecessary in the 21st Century is because of...

...

Generally, the rise of anti-affirmative action initiatives in this century is likely to unconsciously relapse the society back to the 1950s and 1960s where public schools suffered from racial segregation. This is primarily because affirmative action has a reverse discrimination effect in the 21st Century. it's evident that through affirmative action, race is becoming a major deciding factor for job employment, college admissions, and other important aspects of the current society.
Therefore, affirmative action policies and programs should be abolished in order to eliminate the emerging racial quotas and guidelines. This will help in ensuring that people are treated equally as those with the best credentials are hired or admitted since race will no longer be a factor in such decisions. In essence, discrimination and racism will never be eliminated through public policy mainly because of the inability to legislate people's minds.

Conclusion:

Affirmative action is an issue that emerged to help deal with racism and discrimination that were entrenched in the American government and society. However, throughout its history, the concept has attracted huge concerns that have made it to become a divisive issue. As a result, it's unnecessary for the 21st Century because of probable racial segregation and its failure.

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

Conn, S.L. & Niskey, L.T. (1998, April 23). The Legitimacy of Anti-Affirmative Action

Initiatives: Didactical Lessons for 21st Century Administrators. Third Annual National Conference, 25.

Jackson. (n.d.). Why is Affirmative Action Such a Divisive Issue? Retrieved from New York

University website: http://www.nyu.edu/classes/jackson/social.issues/papers/AfActGrF.html
2012, from http://www.edchange.org/multicultural/papers/caleb/aff-action.html
"Where Affirmative Action Stands Today." (2009, May 4). The Society Pages. Retrieved November 27, 2012, from http://thesocietypages.org/colorline/2009/05/04/where-affirmative-action-stands-today/


Cite this Document:

"Affirmative Action In The 21st" (2012, November 27) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/affirmative-action-in-the-21st-76668

"Affirmative Action In The 21st" 27 November 2012. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/affirmative-action-in-the-21st-76668>

"Affirmative Action In The 21st", 27 November 2012, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/affirmative-action-in-the-21st-76668

Related Documents

Affirmative Action is an organization of policies and designed procedures aimed at assisting in the elimination of discrimination against women and other minorities in the human society, together with redressing the possibilities of past discrimination. As required by the Affirmative Action Plan's requirements, Affirmative Action was signed by President Johnson in 1965. It supported and revised by different presidents in the world. The intention of Affirmative Action is to have

367) According to Sander, none of these questions have been asked effectively and therefore we as a nation continue to believe that affirmative action is a necessary social development for the creation of a more representative society, where disenfranchisement must be answered by active plans, policies and laws. Few of us would enthusiastically support preferential admission policies if we did not believe they played a powerful, irreplaceable role in giving nonwhites

Affirmative Action - Should Race be a Factor in Deciding College Admissions? Should race be a deciding factor for college admissions? The debate is one that is hotly contested among students and administrators alike. Many feel that in a tight job market acquiring a college educational is an essential prerequisite for career advancement (Worsnop, 1996) thus competition for admission to many of the nation's best universities is increasing. In addition tuition expenses

Criticism of Affirmative Action Over the years, specific criticisms of Affirmative Action have developed as a result of the endless debate and legal wrangling over the issue, as well as the division in American society about the topic. The first criticism of Affirmative Action to consider is the assertion that the burden of compensating victims of discrimination usually becomes the responsibility of those who are not individually responsible for the discrimination

Unfortunately, at least according to the literature researched here, these are neither sufficiently addressed nor remedied, in most cases, by affirmative action alone at the post-secondary level. Works Cited Bowen, William G., and Bok, Derrick. The Shape of the River: Long-term Consequences of Considering Race in College and University Admissions. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 1998. Comer, J. And Poussaint, Alvin. Black Child Care. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1975. Constitution of the United

One of the primary justifications for affirmative action in higher education has been that the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) and other similar tools used to determine academic potential at the college and post-graduate level reflect a cultural bias in their makeup that benefits non-minorities. Even to whatever extent that may have been true when affirmative action programs were first conceived, opponents of affirmative action in education point out that