Japanese vs Russian War the War Between Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Japanese vs. Russian War

The war between Russia and Japan is a conspicuous occurrence. This was the initial thunderbolt blow of Admiral Togo upon the exposed Russian fleet in Port Arthur as well as the end maturing of the quarrel plus the continuity of the war, which were manifested through a swift unattainable decisiveness under the same circumstances a century ago. It could be true that win of Japanese over Russian was due to strategic and operational skills but not their opponent blunder. The circumstances could be the capacity of the leader and the conditions upon which they are called so that they could act; Lesser and Napoleon men differences could be another factor. The well-known concern was that the war had to turn on only sea and land co-ordination right from its initial by the involved belligerents. Though all of them tried this kind of co-ordination, Japanese were the only ones who achieved it by any measure of effectiveness. Their success was not marked by superiority over their opponent, because they were considered as inferior. The armies which they had were less in number which made the vast empire of Tsar to boast. They were inferior in terms of finance, material and resources. Their fleet was also inferior not forgetting the Black Sea squadron, but this did not prevent them from getting their victory. It is doubtless that it was because of the moral advantage that was bestowed on Japanese by the object of struggle; plus superior preparations and training. However at the beginning of the war, this issue of superiority was not much great since their coming behind the Russians resistance was broken. Their army concentration at the decisive, Liau-yang, was the same way slow as compared to the Russian, their applying military skill in the attack on Port Arthur did not prove to be superior to the defense, in addition, they did not show marked superiority in terms of tactics, spirit or gunnery over their enemy at the Yellow Sea battle, Alfred T. Mahan (1908).

At the time when the world started to recover due to the amazement at the outcome, an explanation was got in the supposition that from the initial onset, Japanese were having the command of the sea. In whichever angle, from the Togo's report on the war, he interprets his view however; it is not the view of the Japanese themselves but from the inquiry and since Togo took part in it. From his report, he indicates that during the opening of their initial stage of their operation by sea, with the combined fleet, they cautiously considered the theatre of war's nature, the land and the sea configuration, as well as the line of operation which would be acted upon by the land forces, which they thereafter selected as the basic object of their strategy. They were to remain within the zone of Port Arthur which was the main area of fleet of their enemy so that they could stop them from getting away to Vladivostok. This meant that their first consideration was the line of operation of the army, Julian S. Corbett (1904-1905).

When the army lied within the offensive side of the war plan, their role was just to provide defensive support through detaining the major fleet of the enemy within an area that they find it hard to interfere with the progress of the army. They made several attacks towards their enemy from the defensive side which went on weakening the enemy. Based on the advantage of their position, they made repeated attacks, however they were not able to attain significant outcome, this was up to mid August when the major forces of the enemy tried to flee from Port Arthur to Vladivostok. The battle of the Ulsa and the Yellow sea went on where unexpectedly broke down fully the war plan of the enemy making them to achieve their object of operation to more than half.

There was another operation which was termed as the second stage. When the spring arrived in the same year and after their fleet had renewed their working power by working it up till its keenest edge, they organized themselves to meet the second squadron of their enemy, however these preparation were not allowed to interfere with the aim of supporting the operations of the land, Corbett, Sir Julian (1907). They blocked the coasts which was possession of the Russia cutting off every transport pertaining supplies of warlike coming from the country of their enemy. A Fleet detachment was sent into the southern waters in a bid to intimidate the sea passage of their enemy.

While this was going on, they captured more than 30 vessels around the Straits of Tsugaru, Kunoshiri, Tsushima and La Perouse. When May was approaching the Second Squadron of their enemy appeared in their home waters. Just from the start the intention was to concentrate their fleet at large within the Korean Strait, so that in well being and comfort to take advantage of the fatigue of the enemy. Out of this the conduct of courage of the officers and men through the god's help, gained success after another. Therefore within the battle of Japan Sea, they swept completely the shadow of their enemy from the sea ending that section of their operation.

The third stage had light naval responsibility. While co-operating with the army, they carried through the Sakhalin's occupation then discharged their joint role nearly failing to lose a man. Severally they made movements within North Korea to intimidate their enemies and every time they went ahead in blockage of Russian possession without relaxing. According to the opinion of Admiral Togo, the Japanese fail to take command of the sea up to the time when the battle of the Japan brought to a successful the conclusion of the second stage of the war. At the first two stages, the comparative strength within their fleet hardly sufficed in order to retain locally within the Straits and the Yellow Sea of Korea, it was a control that was strong enough to stop the enemy from effectively interfering with the army's communications as well as using the their own communication to Vladivostok, Forczyk, Robert (2009).. This was not that strong to allow the free movement of troops to every desired point or areas past supply line anxiety via the occupied areas by the fleet.

A valid command which might have provided the action to the army of Japanese total flexibility that the Russian dreaded could have been achieved through courting a decisive battle within the stage that began. However in the Admiral's view, just a drastically offensive treatment of the condition tend to be more than the comparative resources at his reach, because it was not just question of the relative strength of the two fleet there and then. In far Eastern waters, behind the force of Russia, another fleet in the Baltic was present, and was painfully and slowly coming into being; nevertheless a firm truth was to be reckoned with. At the beginning its threat overshadowed and cramped the strategy of the Japanese, it obligated fleet's husbanding to be the only way of meeting the danger. Togo had no option but to refuse himself the attraction of offensive and support general preventive attitude of military offensive. Through attacks which are minor, he established his defense to be extremely active, even up to the highest levels of prudence and occasionally past what the staff of Admiralty could approve. Nevertheless, his strategy of defensive continued up to the time when attitude paved way for his awesome offensive return and the fleet of the enemy was swept from the sea.

Considering the war with China; the tactics, approach and the operations that they carried, it is then concluded that there was no means under which the Russian could have given a better turn to the war and that the Japanese painful and long nervousness was uncalled for. This was not the case through all means, since there was a means through which they could have been denied the quality of the force on which permission was given to do so that they could enjoy every stages in the theatre of war. Sometimes it was manageable if the Russians could have done something practically but maintains their fleet to be not active.

Had Admiral Makarov lived to comprehend prudence policy though incessant offence with the opinion of disputing the control, had he done his declaration in Liau-tung that at every hazard, the landing of the second army must not be allowed not unless there is drastic interference from his squadron. There is evident that in order to experience a given naval activity display from Port Arthur. The second army might have been landed where it was. If in case the landing has been displaced or delayed materially then the whole plan of the Japanese war would have broken down.

The staff of Japanese Imperial had in mind that by pressing the landing,…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Japanese Vs Russian War The War Between" (2011, July 09) Retrieved December 4, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/japanese-vs-russian-war-the-between-118136

"Japanese Vs Russian War The War Between" 09 July 2011. Web.4 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/japanese-vs-russian-war-the-between-118136>

"Japanese Vs Russian War The War Between", 09 July 2011, Accessed.4 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/japanese-vs-russian-war-the-between-118136

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Japan vs Pearl Harbor What

    But the U.S. demanded that it withdraw from both China and Manchuria in exchange for a reestablishment of trade for oil. Japan's other major source of oil had been the Netherlands, but the Dutch followed the American's oil embargo in August of 1941. The Japanese resolved to take control of Dutch East India's oil fields. If it did so, it knew war with America was inevitable. "The oil stock Japan

  • Theories of War Vietnam

    War: Vietnam The concept of 'Realism' has been one of the most important and dominating theories that has come into force, especially after the World War II. The theory has not only been responsible for guiding international relations but has also been the predominant force behind the formulations of foreign policies. (Theories of International Relations) For most of its history, Vietnam has been under the domination of foreign rule, most

  • WWI & WW2 Comparing and

    The U.S. emerged as a leading superpower and the sole nuclear power in the world, determined to play a leading role in international politics. The post-Second World War era saw the start of a prolonged Cold War in which the U.S. competed for political domination around the world with Soviet Communism until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990. The Second World War also helped the country to

  • Mccarthy and the Cold War One Aspect

    McCarthy and the Cold War One aspect of history is that a country's so-called "friend" one day, can be an enemy the next and visa versa. The United States and Soviet Union during World War II joined ranks against the real threat of Nazi Germany. However, it did not take long after the end of the war for Russia and the United States to once again bully each other. Even before

  • Cold War Refers to the Post World

    Cold war refers to the post world war 2 period till 1991 when there was a geopolitical game being played by two nations that emerged as super powers from the shambles of the world wars. This period was noted for the polarization of power and Russia and America were intensely battling out a strategic war game between them. It was a global conflict in every sense and even the continents

  • Math Achievement African American vs White

    In grade four white males performing "At or Above Basic" math skills is stated at 90% while black males were performing at only 59% "At or Above Basic" skill levels. White males in the "At or Above Proficient" skills level is stated at 49% with black males in this category stated at a mere 13%. The following labeled Figure 2 shows the statistical report of NAEP (2005) in relation to

  • How and Why Did the Allied Occupations of Japan and Korea Differ

    Japan and Korea Occupation How and why did the Allied occupations of Japan and Korea differ? Allied occupations of Japan and Korea date backs to year 1945 when World War II got ended. Both the occupations occurred as a consequence of victory of allies over the axis. The allied powers included the United States of America, United Kingdom, Soviet Union, France, and China whereas axis included Germany, Empire of Japan, and Italy


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved