Management Scientific Management Vs. Human Relations Management Essay

Management Scientific management vs. Human relations Management

The theory of scientific management's objective was to improve economic efficacy, especially within the realm of labor productivity, where efficiency was quite variable. The components that comprise the theory of scientific management include analysis, synthesis, logic, rationality, empiricism, work ethic, efficiency and elimination of waste, standardization of best practices, disdain for tradition among other components of the theory contribute to it's objectives. With these components, the ability for individual production to be transformed into a mass production entity is possible. This theory tends to look at a workforce through the lens of standards and rigidity which will transform individuals...

...

Though in contrast, the human relations management attempts to pay increasing attention to "the human factors" (Acel-Team, 2011). This approach has a tendency to study the "industrial fatigue" and other "employee problems in general," an almost "enlightened paternalism" (Acel-Team, 2011). The difference is sharp in that they deal with the actual workforce in a different way- with the scientific management concentrating more on the company it's efficiency and productivity as a whole, while the human relations management focuses on how each individual makes the entire company an efficient entity.
Using the scientific and human relations as a foundation, it is easier to understand the impact…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Accel-Team. (2011). Human relations school of management to improve productivity. Retrieved from http://accel-team.com/human_relations/index.html

Krauskof, L. (2010, December 06). Abrupt pfizer ceo switch stuns, pleases wall street. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2010/12/06/us-pfizer-idUSTRE6B50B120101206


Cite this Document:

"Management Scientific Management Vs Human Relations Management" (2011, October 14) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-scientific-management-vs-human-52430

"Management Scientific Management Vs Human Relations Management" 14 October 2011. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-scientific-management-vs-human-52430>

"Management Scientific Management Vs Human Relations Management", 14 October 2011, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/management-scientific-management-vs-human-52430

Related Documents

The clear line drawn between accounting and managing, for example, illustrates that traditional accounting systems are of little use to the managers, and that they should have their own accounting systems to meet their needs. Another way in which Fayol influenced managerial accounting systems is in the way he viewed organizational structure. Some of his key structural principles, such as centralization and scalar chain, reinforce the value of management accounting

However, because radically slashing the Department is not feasible in the current international environment, due to the need to keep Americans safe, there has traditionally been less of an incentive for the DoD to institute effective quality control methods, compared with private industries. Corruption and waste regarding the awarding of government contracts is of great concern. There is a so-called 'revolving door' whereby government officials work for the government for

Management Theories Historical records show that people always organized themselves in order to work together towards a common objective and they coordinated their efforts to achieve this objective (Accel-Team 2004). It was not until the latter part of the 19th century that the concept of scientific management entered history during the Industrial Revolution, but management skills existed long before the 19th century. Ancient Egyptians built the pyramids, ancient Chinese erected the

HR will need to have better guidelines in place for individuals in this new atmosphere (Kahnweiler 25-26). However, there are and will always be two main components that the HR department of any organization will cover. The first is comprised of management, leadership and employee motivation and the other is the traditional realm of HR practices which include performance appraisal, training, recruitment and selection, as well as compensation management (salry

KATZ model of management skills necessary at various levels of management? The Katz model of management skills may be argued as dated. The theory, developed by Robert Katz and popular in the 1950's, is based on the idea of three core skills areas; technical skills, human skills, and conceptual skills. When examining this approach, it may be argued each of these skill areas is relevant to management at different levels.

Management as a discipline is generally concerned with the art and science of getting a group of people to achieve a defined goal or objective (Griffin, 2008). The discipline has evolved significantly over the last one century or so (Roth, 1998). In the first half of the 20th century, emphasis was largely placed on structure, authority, and production; with little or no attention to employees (Adetule, 2011). There has, however,