Medical Research in the United States Specifically Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

medical research in the United States. Specifically it will discuss stem cell research and its relationship to ALS (Lou Gehrig's Disease). Stem cell research, although highly debated in the U.S., should be made available in the country to enhance the quality of life by providing research, government funding, and quality physicians.

Just what exactly is stem cell research? Stem cell research is one of the fastest growing areas of medicine, because it holds so much potential for medical breakthroughs. One doctor said, "It is not unrealistic to say that stem cell research has the potential to revolutionize the practice of medicine. -- Dr. Harold Varmus, former NIH director" (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 214). Basically, stem cells can be reproduced in the laboratory, and these stem cells can be used to help fight a variety of diseases, as well as understand how diseases affect the human body and how cells reproduce and change. Stem cells themselves are basic body cells. Authors Best & Kellner note, "Stem cells are the primitive master cells of the body that differentiate into functions like skin, bone, nerve, and brain cells (the body produces over 200 cell types)" (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 215). These master cells come from several sources, and that is where much of the controversy surrounding stem cell research begins.

Why is stem cell research so controversial? The main reason the process is so controversial is because of where researchers obtain the cells they need for research. Many come from the frozen embryos of fetuses that were aborted, or were created in the lab. The Bush Administration has effectively banned funding for this type of stem cell research, and many religious groups are against it too, for moral and ethical reasons. Many people believe that it is a right-to-life issue, and that embryos, no matter how they are obtained, should not be used. Authors Best & Kellner continue, "The Pope and critics of stem cell research argue that once a sperm and egg are mixed into an embryo, no matter what the medium, there is a human life with all of its rights and sacredness" (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 216). This really comes down to the same debate that people argue over in abortion -- when does life begin? Proponents of stem cell research argue that human life does not begin until the brain and spinal cord form, about 14 days into the life of an embryo, and stem cells are usually taken from embryos younger than this. Opponents of the research argue that life begins at conception, even if it is in a Petri dish in the laboratory. In addition to the embryo concerns, many people believe that stem cell research could lead to human cloning, and there are few people who approve of this procedure. Thus, the entire debate is controversial and contentious, and it is one of the biggest hurdles that stem cell research has to get over to continue and grow.

There is a problem with the controversy surrounding stem cell research. Much of it is based on misunderstanding by the public. They believe that human embryos are the main source of stem cells. They do not understand that scientists can grow embryos in the laboratory, and that the stem cells can also be cloned, or recreated. In addition, adult stem cells that come from bone marrow, fat, blood, and other tissues, can also be used in stem cell research. Therefore, stem cells do not necessarily have to come from embryos, they can come from other areas as well, and research shows that adult stem cells react almost exactly the same as embryonic stem cells in most situations (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 215). However, there are some situations where embryonic stem cells offer advantages.

There are many advantages to funding stem cell research right now. First, costs always increase, and the longer scientists wait, the more expensive it will become. Most large companies will not fund the research on their own, and so, any research being done is by smaller research organizations, which may run out of funding before their research is completed. That means research will simply take that much longer, and valuable time may be wasted. Writer David Magnus notes, "It places the research in the hands of companies that have no products to sell and whose only assets are represented by the intellectual property they can claim, which may encourage those companies to hype spurious work to help attract needed venture capital" (Magnus, 2004). This could be dangerous to all Americans in the end, if the research is shoddy or questionable. Another very compelling reason for government-sponsored research is that the government could increase control over the research, which could ensure higher quality research and development, rather than under-funded research at smaller companies where results could be questionable.

There is another advantage to stem cell research and funding now. If scientists can understand the potential of stem cells through discovery and research, people might be able to live longer and happier lives. For example, a person's stem cells could be harvested shortly after they are born, and then saved in case they were needed later to treat diseases or illnesses. Stem cells could even recreate lost limbs and organs (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 215-216). It seems that the possibilities for stem cell use are perhaps endless. Studies have not been done on humans yet, but in many other experiments, stem cells have been shown to "produce insulin, induce growth of brain cells, and form new blood vessels in hearts, thereby suggesting immense contributions to curing diabetes, Alzheimer's or Parkinson's, and heart disease" (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 216). The longer the country waits to approve research and development, the more lives will be lost.

Many doctors, scientists, and researchers believe in the benefit of continued stem cell research. Many Republicans support it even if the Bush Administration does not. For example, Senator Bill Frist, a Republican from Tennessee, "Because both embryonic and adult stem cell research may contribute to significant medical and health advancement, research on both should be federally funded within a carefully regulated, fully transparent framework that ensures respect for the moral significance of the human embryo" (Best & Kellner, 2004, p. 215). Frist is the only Medical Doctor in the Senate, and so he understands the implications of stem cell research as well as the many contributions it could make to medicine and overall health.

That is one of the reasons the government should encourage stem cell research. With continued research, eventually, researchers and doctors will understand how stem cells can effectively be used to treat a variety of illnesses, and the research will lead to saving lives and finding cures for some of the world's most devastating fatal diseases. The government could also help ensure research is of the highest quality and will give the best overall results. It is important for medical research to continue and grow, because the world has always depended on valuable medical research to help cure a variety of devastating diseases, such as polio and yellow fever. Government-sponsored funding can also help ensure that the best doctors use the research in their own practices. That will give the American people more control over their health care and their lives. Good research can create better doctors by giving them more choices to treat their patients.

How does stem cell research apply to devastating and fatal diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), also sometimes known as "Lou Gehrig's Disease?" The disease killed the legendary ballplayer at the age of 35 in 1941. Diseases like ALS attack brain cells and spinal cells so that the cells (motor neurons) cannot communicate with the muscles. Writer Harold Hopkins notes, "What we do know is that ALS generally affects the nerves leading from the brain to the spinal cord and from the spinal cord and brain stem to the muscles, resulting in a progressive weakening and wasting of those muscles [ ... ]" (Hopkins, 1984). Eventually, the muscles degenerate, the body degenerates and the sufferer becomes paralyzed, and ultimately dies. Worst, there is no cure for the disease, and doctors do not really even know exactly what causes it. Some types attack brain neurons, while other types attack spinal cord neurons. It usually hits a person between the ages of 40 and 70, and it attacks more men than women. It can be hereditary, but not always (Hopkins, 1984). It is a devastating disease, and there still is no hope for cure. That is why it is so important to continue research into treatments like stem cell research, because there are still so many diseases like ALS that are not understood or curable.

Stem cells show some promise in treating ALS by helping to regenerate the motor neurons that stop sending messages to the muscles. Dr. Lucie Bruijn, an ALS expert writes, "what may have appeared to be impossible several years ago and of particular…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Medical Research In The United States Specifically" (2005, October 31) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from

"Medical Research In The United States Specifically" 31 October 2005. Web.25 October. 2016. <>

"Medical Research In The United States Specifically", 31 October 2005, Accessed.25 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • United States President Comparing and Contrasting the

    United States' President Comparing and contrasting the U.S. healthcare system with that of various other nations is not a simple job. There are a lot of details that are not just arranged in a variety of methods however likewise they are made use of to determine considerable and deviating elements. The conclusion will frequently rely on exactly what is thought and which elements are the most vital to the people carrying

  • United States Has the Most

    Al., 2010). Nursing and the ER The Emergency Room is often one of the most visible parts of healthcare for political debate. It is also one of the most difficult environments for a modern nurse. It is interesting that one of the founders of modern nursing had emergency experience prior to developing her overall theories. Nightingale also looked at negatives and positives that are the conditions, which could help make people recover

  • United States Steel Corp v

    Therefore, it meets the threshold requirement for limited safe haven. Moreover, the provision of medical services appears to fall under the qualifications of the SCM that services be a controlled service transaction or a group of transactions. This provision of services is not one of the prohibited services including manufacturing, production, extraction of mineral resources, construction, reselling, research and development, engineering, financial, or insurance. In United Parcel Service of America,

  • Medical Research & Ethics Medical Research and

    Medical Research & Ethics Medical Research and Ethics Conflict between Medical Research & Ethics Conflict between Medical Research & Ethics: Case of Tuskegee Syphilis Each day medical providers and researchers make decisions about what information is necessary to disclose to patients and under what circumstances they should make disclosures. In the clinical setting, the negative implications of a poorly considered disclosure decision can involve simple problems such as a patient being unaware that a

  • United States Government Has Been

    The War on Drugs was likely bad public policy from the beginning. It was an over-reaction to what politicians believed was a major social problem. The major social problem was society's method of dealing with the perceived problem and not the actual problem of drug use. Through the Controlled Substance Act Congress created a whole new class of criminal and a black market industry that makes the bootlegging of the

  • United States Army Do to

    Hearing loss is very case specific because one person who has hearing loss or impairment may be able to hear certain sounds or be completely deaf. Impairment entails something is not working as well as it should but there may still be some basic functioning. Hearing loss can go by many terms such as deaf, deafness, or hard of hearing. All could be one and the same situation but as

  • US Blockade of Cuba

    Cuban Embargo American-Cuban Sanctions Implications for the Future The United States has a long and complicated history with Cuba that dates back over 100 years (Ciment 1115). The United States assumed occupancy over Cuba after defeating the Spanish at the end of the 1898 Spanish-American War. Cuba became an independent country in 1902, although the United States continued to delegate power and control over Cuba's affairs through the Piatt Amendment. Supervised elections began

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved