Learning Organization: A New Paradigm in Business Management
Any company that is going to make it... (in the 21st century) has got to find a way to engage the mind of every single employee. If you're not thinking all the time about making every person more valuable, you don't have a chance. What's the alternative? Wasted minds? Uninvolved people? A labor force that's angry or bored? That doesn't make sense!"
John Welch, Jr.
In every companies annual report there is always a statement about how important human capital is when determining the overall success of any business. These organizations assert that their employees are a highly valued part of their companies and that their efforts and resources are focused on both employee satisfaction and continuous employee development. In some situations, these statements are true. But in some companies, they are only words strung together in a way that impresses potential shareholders. When most organizations are studied, the reality of their commitment to employees and continuous learning is contrary to what is usually expressed in the annual report or in their mission and vision statements. In most cases, employees are treated as "disposable resources to be used and disposed of as the organization sees fit, like pawns in a great, competitive contest among the mighty lords of industry. Because of this approach, many of a firm's best employees leave, seeking opportunities for growth, development, and appreciation in other organizations." (Gilley et al., 2000) In most companies today, there is a divide between the perceived value of employees and their treatment within the organizations that they serve.
But, as radical changes in the way we work are beginning to revolutionize business and modern society, companies are being forced to re-think the value of their human capital. The days of paying lip service to the concept of the employee as king is over -- and investing in employees and their continuous learning in the 21st century is in. Most organizations, in order to survive, must now morph into what is commonly referred to as a "learning organization" and managers are being compelled to constantly retool themselves as well as their business teams in order to survive in the new workplace.
So what is a learning organization? "A learning organization is an organization skilled at creating, acquiring and transferring knowledge, and at modifying its behavior to reflect new knowledge and insights." (Goh, 1998) For most companies, identifying what a learning organization should be and actually becoming one is tricky at best -- impossible at worst. One way that manager's and companies can promote the concept of being a learning organization is to assess whether the company is in need of a short-term fix or whether it is more focused on long-term results. "Organizational learning is a long-term activity that will build competitive advantage over time and requires sustained management attention, commitment, and effort. A list of companies frequently cited as learning organizations confirms this fact. These companies include Motorola, Wal-Mart, British Petroleum (BP), Xerox, Shell, Analog Devices, GE, 3M, Honda, Sony, Nortel, Harley-Davidson, Corning, Kodak, and Chaparral Steel." (Goh) Learning organizations maximize their competitive positions during strong economic times and they prudently train their employees and prepare for change even in turbulent times. As a result, learning organizations and learning managers are usually envied by their competitors who are still struggling to stay competitive, but are not willing to do what it takes to improve overall company and employee performance.
It is important to note that no matter how much money a company invests to position themselves as a learning organization, if they fail to properly train their managers the process has little chance for success. Managers are a company's "front line marketers" when it comes to rolling out new initiatives and training programs. If the manager of one department refuses to invest in all of his employees equally, the process will break down and the company will become stagnant. Becoming a learning organization therefore begins with management.
One of the first steps a learning manager needs to take in building a learning organization from within his/her department is to build trust between themselves and all of their employees. "An (learning manager) can build an effective relationship with employees only if certain conditions are met. We suggest that those conditions are expressed in the level of trust, commitment, organizational support, and the kinds of communication embedded in each and experienced in the employee's work life." (Barker et al., 1998)
Trust can be defined as a "generalized expectancy or belief held by an individual that another individuals' word - oral or written statement can be relied upon." (Barker et al.) Trust has a huge impact on employee influence, coordination and control. Additionally,...
This qualitative study, which used the methods of case study, in-depth interviewing, and focus group discussions (FGDs) is particularly vital to the implementation of change in organizational structures, from being a hierarchical to being decentralized. Like Perry, the study puts the manager's role as the most pivotal within the organization, primarily because s/he serves as the 'catalyst' for change and innovation in it. Other literature also stress the role of
Product Management Issues Quality of Design, Performance, and TQM -- As manufacturing design and implementation became even more complex, an integrative approach to the end product became necessary. There are many theoretical rubrics for this, but one of the more stable and robust is that of TQM, or Total Quality Management. TQM, like other theories such as Six Sigma, is based on the idea that the quality of the end product
Granted it is argued that not all new employment opportunities are managerial in nature, but even if the 20% figure frequently quoted regarding the percentage of managerial occupations open today, competent lower-level employees who can deal with problems and the public in a creative fashion and perform the secondary and tertiary activities in a manner to make customers want to return cannot be undervalued. Reduced job security also makes it
Leaders Can Effectively Manage Change in an Organization It has often been said that a manager is what one does and a leader is who one is. The differences between management and leadership transcend difference sin perception of how an organization and emanate from how a management professional chooses to gain support and cooperation in the attainment of objectives. Managers often are given the task of maintaining the status quo
Ayers (2000, p. 4) describes a supply chain as "Life cycle processes supporting physical, information, financial, and knowledge flows for moving products and services from suppliers to end-users." A supply chain can be short, as in the case of a cottage industry, or quite long and complex as in the manufacture, distribution, and sales of automobiles. In fact, the automobile supply chain has its origin in the mining of the
Cultural Analysis of Sony Defining Organizational Culture: Organizational culture can be defined in several ways. The definitions that apply to this essay are discussed below. Morgan (1986) defined organizational culture as the development patterns as mirrored by the society's ideology, laws, knowledge system, daily rituals and laws. Schein (1985) says that organizational culture has relations with observed norms, behavioral regularities, policies, philosophies or values, the acceptable behavior and the sense of belonging
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now