New York State Department of Parole essay

Download this essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from essay:

New York State Department of Parole or the Department of Corrections is an agency of the state responsible for the supervision and management of criminals convicted of a crime, felony level or higher. The Department of Corrections was put in place to provide protection for the community by operating and managing safe, secure facilities that keep offenders under control as well as allow them fair treatment during time served. The main objective of the agency is to minimize the risk of criminal behavior through a partnership consisting of communities, a continuum of community supervision, incarceration, sanctions and services to deal with criminal or unlawful behavior. The core values existing within the sequence of probation, prison, and parole is the foundation that the least antagonistic adjustment be used to monitor offender behavior, all while adhering to public safety rules and regulations.

What does it truly encompass to be paroled in America? The term parole, like other criminal justice terms, is often times misinterpreted to signify different things or in some cases, is just not fully comprehended. The definition of parole as stated by Eisenstadt & Moss is: an offender serves a section of their given sentence while under the supervision of either their community or an officer. (Eisenstadt, & Moss, 2005, p. 120) Another definition, given by the U.S. Parole Commission, states that parole may be granted if:

1. The convicted person has extensively followed the rules of the institution

2. If release would not abate the gravity of the offenses or advocate impudence for the law.

3. Release would not threaten the public welfare. (National Institute of Corrections (U.S.), 2001, p. 45)

This definition implies that parole systems set in different states vary in how they observe the rules and regulations. Parole systems are the same in regards to overall structure, but differ in the details. By applying research to how New York deals with the parole system, many interesting facts and figures will surface that interconnect with the idea of parole for offenders and how successful or unsuccessful the system for the state and to some level, the country, truly is. A quick example would be offenders get 6 months to a year of unsupervised probation if it is their first offense committed in New York. This law applies countrywide, but only to certain crimes.

Looking into the origin of probation allows an insight into the need for probation's existence. The origin of probation can be traced back to England and its criminal laws of the Middle Ages. Punishments were not only given to adults, but children, and not only for major crimes. People were treated in the same, harsh manner for petty crimes as well as major crimes. Sentences included branding, flogging, mutilation, as well as public execution. (Morgan Jr., 2009, p. 2) Public execution was so common that during the time of King Henry VIII, over a hundred crimes (some, minor offenses) were punishable by death.

The severity of these punishments were eventually met with discontent by English society. Consequently, they decided to re-evaluate their justice system. Progressive mentality wanted to generate a justice system that would slowly, but resolutely make an effort to alleviate barbaric and unfair punishments. They went about doing this through a variety of measures that were concocted and adapted to suit the needs of the many. Examples of these were royal pardons which could be purchased by the person accused; leniency could be granted by decision of the judge; stolen property could be diminished in value by the court so offenders could receive a lesser crime charge.

Additional methods such as: benefit of clergy, judicial reprieve, sanctuary, and abjuration, gave offenders a level of protection from receiving bleaker charges.(Parent, & National Institute of Justice (U.S.), Abt Associates, 1994, p. 56) In time, the courts initiated the practice of "binding over for good behavior," a form of ephemeral release during which offenders could take action to assure resources for pardons or lesser sentences. As it progressed in the United States, certain courts began adjourning sentences. Offenders achieved adjournment through a method similar to modern bail: the accused paid a fee as collateral for good behavior.

Filing executed in cases that did not require an instant sentencing, was also permitted and is the norm for minor cases presently. Using this maneuver, indictments were "laid on file" or held in recess. To alleviate arbitrary mandatory penalties, judges often assumed a motion to extirpate based upon minor technicalities or mistakes in the proceedings. These American practices are seen today as precursors to probation. It is also acknowledged as the early use of recognizance and suspended sentence which played a direct role in modern probation.

Modern Probation encompasses a variety of terms and actions. Intensive Supervised Probation or ISP is a form of release into the community that spotlights close supervision of convicted offenders and appoints stringent conditions on that release, such as the following:

Multiple weekly correspondence with officer, mainly verbal (phone) or in person

Random and unannounced drug testing to assure the offender is not under the influence

Strict obligation of conditions, for instance, maintaining a job

Required attendance in treatment, education programs, volunteer work, etc. (Barker, 2009, p. 12)

ISP is only reserved for those who are deemed least likely to exist in society without regressing back to criminal activity in the community. The degree of limitation placed on them is often exorbitant and the level of direct, face-to-face contact required is thought to greatly impede, or at least thwart any ongoing criminal activity. Some say the opposite and feel as though this kind of parole serves to keep criminals from ever becoming upstanding citizens, which will be assessed later on.

Another form of probation is Shock Probation and Split Sentencing. Shock probation/split sentencing is a sentence for a designation of years, but after 1-3 months, the convicted is withdrawn from jail or prison. While both these concepts are used vice versa, they are in reality two different activities. Shock probation has the offender originally sentenced to jail, then taken before the judge after 1-3 months and re-sentenced to probation. Split sentencing, has the offender receive probation as part of the original sentence demanding no supplementary appearance before the judge. Still, the terms refer to jail, some community service or both. (Reichel, 2008, p. 23)

Reichel, P.L. (2008) discusses in Comparative Criminal Justice Systems: A topical approach the concept of revocation. Revocation refers to the removal of probation privileges. Probation is afterall, a conditional release. Because of this, under the right conditions, it can be revoked, or taken away. The conditions include a technical violation or if the person charged is convicted of a new crime within the probationary period. The process of probation revocation is first done by the probation officer's belief that a violation deserving revocation happened. As a result of the 1973 case Gagnon v. Scarpelli, the Supreme Court assured that where "liberty relevance" is involved, probationers are honored to clutch certain due process rights. Such rights include:

1. Written declaration of the supposed violations

2. Preliminary (or PROBABLE CAUSE) HEARING where a judicial authority will decide whether enough probable cause exists to continue the case

3. If warranted, a revocation hearing.

If a revocation hearing is then set up, probationers are given the authority to testify on their own behalf, may present witnesses, and may also have an attorney present. New York allows the offender the right to an attorney. If the person cannot retain a private lawyer, the court will appoint one. The court appointed lawyer option usually leaves the offender with little chance of escaping a harsher plea if a private lawyer is not retained, but does allow the offender time to prepare a defense.

The standard of proof needed at a revocation hearing is a "preponderance of the evidence," which means it needs less than what a criminal trial would. Possible outcomes include return to supervision, discipline with renewal to supervision, or revocation with jail time. Looking into modern parole/probation and how England began using probation and criminal leniency allows for a deeper look into the role of parole and the purpose it serves. As mentioned prior, the system of corrections existed for centuries before modern times.

The corrections history of New York is only a small piece of the picture that makes up parole/probation in the United States. But to begin to look into what this kind of agency is truly about, one must look at the problems it faces in its continual sequence of delivery and action. Are criminals re-offending? Can people put under probation and parole continue a normal and stable life outside of the criminal-justice system? Do actions like revocation and sealing perpetuate/hinder or help reduce criminal activity?

In the United States, Zebulon Brockaway, the superintendent of the Elmira Reformatory during the 1870s instituted the first indeterminate sentencing law in the United States. He also proposed the first good behavior system in order to diminish inmates' sentences and generate better behavior…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"New York State Department Of Parole" (2013, June 14) Retrieved December 11, 2016, from

"New York State Department Of Parole" 14 June 2013. Web.11 December. 2016. <>

"New York State Department Of Parole", 14 June 2013, Accessed.11 December. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Innovation to Prevent Recidivism Within the NYC Department of Parole...

    Strategic Analysis NYC Parole Department STRATEGIC ANALYSIS OF THE NYC DEPARTMENT OF PAROLE External and Internal Environment's Analysis Internal Environment Analysis SWOT Analysis Matrix Strategic issues in NYC department of parole Formulate strategies to manage the issues The strengths and weaknesses of the NYC department of parole are analyzed through external and internal environments. The analysis of the forces, factors, and components that affect the performance of the organizations are elaborated in the sections below. The strategy

  • Innovation for Recidivism Within the NYC Department of Parole

    Recidivism Probation and parole have historically been used to provide someone with a second chance. It is designed to offer alternatives other than keeping them in jail or sending them directly there. At the heart of these ideas, is to allow the individual to demonstrate how they have changed and can serve as a productive member of society. In the event that they have violated these terms, there are number of

  • Parole Introduction Society Experiences Crime

    Surprisingly after a period of 28 months the Florida Department of Corrections found that the recidivism rate for these malefactors was only 13.6% as compared to 25% for those that completed their time in prison. Ronald L. Goldfarb and Linda R. Singer quoted an American Bar Association committee which commented after their observations on this case: If we, today, turned loose all of the inmates of our prisons without regard

  • Pre Sentence Investigation Onondaga County Probation Department Presentence...

    Pre-Sentence Investigation ONONDAGA COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTMENT PRESENTENCE REPORT Court: Onondaga County Case No.: 11-4949 Indictment#: 11-1-20 Judge: Fred Friendly AKA/Maiden: N/A DR#: N/A Prosecutor: James Joyce Age/DOB: 10/01/81 Court Cont.#: N/A Main St. NYSID#: 937532 Legal Counsel: Tim Tom Tully, NY 13159 FBI#: 328-488-94 Phone [HIDDEN] Offense Date: 11/11/11 Arrest Date: 11/12/11 Conviction Date: 12/11/11 Original Charges: Stalking 2nd Final Conviction: Stalking 4th Charge Code: 120.45 NYS Penal Law A Class B Misdemeanor Codefendant/Correspondent: N/A Restitution: N. Relationship to Victim: Acquaint. Victim Impact: Sent:

  • Parole Board Robert the Chair

    While implementing the work-release program may lead to an increased risk to people outside of the prison environment that risk is at least theoretical, while the risks associated with overcrowded prisons are concrete. Moreover, William could attempt to develop and implement risk assessment and screening processes for the work release program. For example, he could ask for input from the correctional officers, who have had experience with the inmates,

  • Parole Agent Interview With Parole

    They get out and go back to doing whatever got them into prison. 8. What kind of work might you have done instead? I don't really know. I guess that I still want to try to fix the system that keeps men just recycling in and out of prison. This isn't that job. I really think that I do my job well, but the system isn't designed to keep people from

  • Merging Probabtion and Parole in

    There are, for example, great differences among states regarding the way in which these systems are managed and the rights and responsibilities of officers for both sectors of the legal system. In New Jersey, the goal of probation is to promote the reintegration of offenders into the community, while encouraging a responsible, law-abiding lifestyle for such a person (New Jersey Courts, 2013). In total, probation officers are responsible for more

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved