Object Relations Theory Development of Term Paper

Download this Term Paper in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Term Paper:

Interpretation itself has several phases, corresponding to the beginning phase of therapy. During interpretation, patient and therapist work to understand the nature of the patient's disturbed object relationships by the "unconscious meanings of their behavior in their transferential relationship with the therapist" (McGinn, 1998, p. 192) the first phase of interpretation is a time for exploration and free association; at this point, the patient is expressing and the therapist is formulating the meanings of those expressions in terms of object relations. This is followed by an "empathic confrontation," in which the therapist gently guides the patient's maladaptive unconscious object relations into consciousness. Once the patient is conscious of his behaviors, the final phase of interpretation can take place, which is sometimes called a "genetic interpretation" (McGinn, 1998, p. 192). This is when the therapist "uses his interpretations of the current relationship between himself and the patient and links it to unconscious meanings from the patient's past" (McGinn, 1998, p. 192). The purpose of interpretation is to provide the background information and understanding necessary for successful transference work.

The present relationship between therapist and patient is the basis for a second technique common to or therapy -- transference analysis -- corresponding roughly to the middle stage of therapy. It is assumed that all patients will begin to "transfer" pathological relationship patterns (object relations) from their past onto the therapist, allowing the therapist to analyze what is going wrong outside of therapy based on what occurs in-session (McGinn, 1998). This is somewhat overlapping with interpretation, but at this point the therapist needs to gradually take on a stable role as a "good-object" for the patient. Then, using his prior interpretation, the therapist can tie the patient's symptoms and treatment goals to one or more overriding themes of abnormal relating (McGinn, 1998). The trustworthy, good-object stance of the therapist will then allow patient and therapist to bring these abnormal behavior patterns into consciousness, where they can hopefully be redefined and reworked into healthier object relations during the final phases of therapy.

The role of the therapist

The role of the or therapist is different from traditional psychoanalysts in that he is expected to show a degree of empathy for the patient's traumatic past and dysfunctional patterns of relating. The patient is likely very frightened, on a primitive level, of bringing his "split-off" object relations into consciousness where they can be confronted and transformed; the therapist needs to be gentle and understanding in order to facilitate successful transference and conscious integration of the self. In addition, the or therapist must work to keep his own countertransference emotions (the reactions and emotions he experiences as a result of being the target of the patient's transference), conscious and in check (McGinn, 1998). If the therapist doesn't successfully maintain his stance as an objective, neutral transference object, he may become just another "all-bad" object relation to the patient, and therapeutic efforts will be thwarted.

Finally, as mentioned earlier, the therapist must be schooled in recognizing the responding appropriately to the various primitive defense mechanisms a patient will exhibit, such as projection, introjection, splitting, dissociation, etc. The therapist must act as a guide, steering carefully around complex and counterproductive defense mechanisms, in order to bring the patient to a point where he can see the truth behind his disorder as a result of personal insight (Murdock, 2009).

Personal reflection

I believe this model of therapeutic treatment, based on or theory, will be an excellent fit for my plans to work with adults with axis-two personality disorders. I personally find the object relations paradigm of the development of the self to be highly understandable and applicable to any form of personality disorder. In particular, I agree with Otto Kernberg's take on the very difficult to treat borderline patient, in terms of those patients' severe splitting between good people and bad people, and in terms of the borderline patient being "stuck" in an immature, black and white, paranoid-schizoid point-of-view.

The challenges I face will apply to all patients with personality disorders. In very general terms, I will be dealing with patients who not only initially see me and treat me as "all-bad" or "all-good," but who are very skilled at manipulating others to behave and react in ways they find familiar. I will have to be very aware at all times of these defense mechanisms, to ensure that I react appropriately and helpfully. For example, a patient who has internalized abusive tendencies from a parent may in turn "attribute those abusing tendencies to the therapist and unconsciously provoke in the therapist such abusive feelings toward them (McGinn, 1998, p. 192). This can happen in very subtle and sneaky ways, particularly with certain personality disordered individuals, so I will have to remain vigilant. Neutrality and empathy will not always be easy, but they are critical to my success as a therapist.


Buckley, P. (1996). An Object Relations Perspective on the Nature of Resistance and Therapeutic Change. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 50 (1), 45+.

Buckley, P. (1994). Self-Psychology, Object Relations Theory and Supportive Psychotherapy. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 48 (4), 519+.

Knight, Z. (2006). Some Thoughts on the Psychological Roots of the Behavior of Serial Killers as Narcissists: an Object Relations Perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 34 (10), 1189+.

McGinn, L. (1998). Interview: Otto F. Kernberg, M.D., F.A.P.A., Developer of Object Relations Psychoanalytic Therapy for Borderline Personality…[continue]

Cite This Term Paper:

"Object Relations Theory Development Of" (2011, February 20) Retrieved October 21, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/object-relations-theory-development-of-4671

"Object Relations Theory Development Of" 20 February 2011. Web.21 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/object-relations-theory-development-of-4671>

"Object Relations Theory Development Of", 20 February 2011, Accessed.21 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/object-relations-theory-development-of-4671

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Object Relations Theory

    Object Relations Theory What exactly is 'Object Relations Theory'? What does it deal with? What is it about? The Theory as such is based on the belief and conviction that every single person has within themselves a completely world of relations and relationships that may well be quite different and at times even infinitely more compelling and forceful and convincing than what actually is happening in their real world filled with

  • Therapy the Object Relations Theory of the

    Therapy The object relations theory of the personality developed from the study of the patient-therapist relationship as it relates to the earlier mother-infant dyad. Object relations theory emphasizes the infant's early experiences with its primary caregiver (typically the mother) as the fundamental determinant of the formation of adult personality. The infant's need for attachment is the primary motivating factor in the development of the self. Two schools of Object Relations theorists

  • Object Relation Attachment Theories and

    During the next chapter of this clinical case study dissertation, the Literature Review section, this researcher relates accessed information that contributes a sampling of previous research to begin to enhance the understanding needed to help a patient "grow" not only in therapy, but also in life. CHAPTER II LITERATURE REVIEW The theories and techniques used in psychoanalysis are very diverse; Freudian analysis is only one approach." Thomas and McGinnis, 1991, ¶ 1) Diverse Contentions One

  • Personality in Psychology the Object Relations

    As the individual grows, the extended family becomes an increasing part of his or her life. At a certain age, the individual goes to preschool or primary school, and thus becomes part of society as a whole. This is where the primary relationship with the first family unit plays its most important role. I believe that object-relations theory has much to offer in terms of ensuring the healthy development of

  • Jasmine Dell Object Relations Case

    A precursor behavior denotes to actions that happen before the difficulty. For instance, in the circumstance above there are some actions that happen before the setback. First, Jasmine parents are very strict basically forcing her to accept strict religious rules thus becoming very uncomfortable (Murdock, 2008). Also, Jasmine seems to go along with her father strict rules and seems to see everything in black and white thus making her

  • Freud s Psycho Analysis and Psychoanalytic Object

    For a person working through a shadowy part of him- or herself, the goal can be as generic as better self-knowledge and self-management. Working through must be recognized as a process, but also as a process with a certain goal in mind. To successfully work through any part of the self, it must also be recognized that certain unpleasant elements may be uncovered before the goal is reached. The therapist

  • Freud and His Complete Theory of Grief Bereavement

    Grief Freud's theory of Grief and bereavement Grade Course Id, Ego and the Superego or the conscious and the unconscious mind are some of the terms which are well-known by almost every individual. These words not only point out to the field of Psychology but also to the man who coined them and proposed a new realm of theories behind each of it; Sigmund Freud. He is famous for being the father

Read Full Term Paper
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved