Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … forum #4: Civil liberties/Civil rights
One recent famous 't-shirt' case involving the civil liberties of a defendant was Guiles v. Marineau, in which a middle-schooler who wore a t-shirt openly critical of President George Bush was suspended from school for being disruptive. Zachary Guiles "was later allowed back in school, but he was told that he couldn't wear the T-shirt unless he taped over certain pictures on the T-shirt -- pictures of a martini glass, lines of cocaine, straws, and razor blades. The pictures were references to substance abuse problems President Bush is said to have had as a younger man. These problems were also described in words on the T-shirt" ("Student Free Speech Rights: Guiles v. Marineau: Issues). Although the Supreme Court ultimately declined to hear the case, the Second Circuit judges where the case was decided "determined that for speech that isn't vulgar…Schools may not regulate such student speech unless it would materially and substantially disrupt classwork and discipline in the schools" ("Student Free Speech...
Marineau: The Appeal"). Given that Guiles had worn the t-shirt for a month before the school complained, clearly wearing the shirt was not disruptive. The shirt also had clear political content and was not designed to promote drug use but rather was intended to critique the contradiction between Bush's war on drugs and the President's own past drug use.
Allowing students' political messages to be censored is open to abuse by administrators, given that students who wear shirts advocating positions that the administration dislikes could be labeled 'disruptive' versus those who are ignored because they support more popular, conventional viewpoints. The school has a role to support education and encouraging young people to take an interest in current events is clearly a component of that mission.
The U.S. Patriot Act, however, has been criticized for limiting the ability of all Americans to have their civil liberties protected while they enjoy that most basic of rights: the right to read and to check books out of their local…
Works Cited
Elliott, Justin. "Remember when the Patriot Act was all about library records." Pro-Publica.
17 Jun 2013. 27 Apr 2014. http://www.propublica.org/article/remember-when-the-patriot-act-debate-was-about-library-records
"Student Free Speech Rights: Guiles v. Marineau: Issues." ACLU. 27 Apr 2014.
https://acluvt.org/issues/guiles_v_marineau_issues.php
https://acluvt.org/issues/guiles_v_marineau_appeal.php
Patriot Act Debate: Pros and Cons Pros Cons Arguments in favor of the Patriot Act The Patriot Act was passed soon after the terrorists attacks of 2001 on America. The aim of the act was to improve the counter terrorism efforts the country to help prevent future such attacks. The act allows the government and the government security agencies to use the tools that were already available in order to investigate organized crime and drug
It is, in one sense, a give and take relationship, but underlying it are the philosophies of Rousseau and Smith, in spite of the fact that both are full of contradictions. Rousseau, for example, states that man's "first law is to provide for his own preservation, his first cares are those which he owes to himself; and, as soon as he reaches years of discretion, he is the sole
" According to the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). A "national security letter" (NSL) is basically a written demand by the FBI or other federal law enforcement agencies for a group or organization to turn over records or data or documents, with no warrant attached to the demand. They are given out without probably cause or any justice-related back-up, and have been used extensively since the Patriot Act; they are
Patriot Act in Regards to Its Authorization of Surveillance and Search and Seizure The Patriot Act: The Patriot Act was enacted into law in 2001 to unite and strengthen America through the provision of suitable tools that are necessary to interrupt and barricade terrorism acts. This legislation was established with the dignified intention of identifying and indicting international terrorists operating on the United States' soil ("USA Patriot Act," n.d.). The Act, which amended
However, cases about terrorism where police investigate individuals who are fundamentalist Muslims, the religious group known to have produced the September 11 terrorists, are an almost immediate cry of "racial and religious profiling." Claims of racial profiling are complaints against what is an established police investigation method and are a last resort by accused individuals to divert attention away from their crimes and toward a more favorable outcome. Situations of
Patriot Act and Constitutional Freedom Thomas Jefferson said: 'The price of freedom is constant vigilance.' Unfortunately in a large nation dedicated to the individual freedom and liberty of all its citizens, the only time when the nation learns that is has not been vigilant enough is when a person, or group of persons take advantage of that freedom, and abuse the liberty of others in order to further their own